Electrical Machines · Chapter 19

MMF of Distributed Windings and Winding Factors

Part 1 · Principles of Energy Conversion — a real winding is spread over many slots and its coils fall short of a full pole pitch. Both choices cost a few percent of EMF and buy a far better waveform. The winding factor is the price.

Prof. Mithun Mondal Engineering Devotion Digital Textbook
i Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter you should be able to:

  • Explain why armature windings are distributed over many slots rather than concentrated in one.

  • Compute pole pitch, slot angle \(\beta\), slots per pole per phase \(m\) and phase spread for a given machine.

  • Distinguish single-layer, concentric and double-layer windings and state the advantages of each.

  • Derive the pitch factor \(k_c = \cos(\alpha/2)\) and use it to suppress a chosen harmonic.

  • Derive the distribution factor \(K_d = \sin(m\beta/2)/\left[m\sin(\beta/2)\right]\) by both the arithmetic and the phasor route.

  • Form the winding factor \(k_w = k_cK_d\) and insert it into the EMF equation.

  • Sketch the stepped mmf wave of a distributed winding and compute the amplitude of its fundamental.

  • Explain why a few percent of EMF is willingly given up for harmonic suppression.

Section 19-1

Why Windings Are Distributed

Chapter 17 analysed a single coil rotating in a field and obtained \(T = 2BIlr\sin\theta\). Chapter 18 replaced that by the general energy result. Both treated the winding as a single concentrated coil, and no real machine is built that way.

Winding all the turns of a phase into one pair of slots would be a poor design for three reasons. The copper would be impossible to cool, being all in one place. The EMF waveform would be a rough square wave, rich in harmonics. And the iron between the slots would carry an enormous local flux while the rest sat idle.

So the turns are distributed — spread over several slots per pole per phase — and the coils are usually short-pitched, spanning slightly less than a full pole pitch. Both choices reduce the fundamental EMF slightly, and both improve the waveform enormously. This chapter quantifies the trade.

Two preliminary facts about the windings themselves, which distinguish AC machines from the DC machines of Part 2:

  • DC machines have closed-circuit windings — the winding forms a continuous closed path round the armature.

  • Alternator windings are open: there is no closed path for the currents in the winding itself. One end is joined to neutral and the other brought out, giving a star connection.

Video · Armature Windings and Winding Factors
Section 19-2

Winding Terminology

Five quantities describe the geometry of any distributed winding, and every formula in this chapter is built from them.

Table 19.1 — Winding quantities. \(S\) = slots, \(P\) = poles, \(q\) = phases.
QuantitySymbolFormulaMeaning
Slots per pole\(n\)\(S/P\)The pole pitch, in slots
Slot angle\(\beta\)\(180^{\circ}/n\)Electrical angle between adjacent slots
Slots per pole per phase\(m\)\(S/(P q) = n/q\)Coils in one phase belt
Phase spread\(m\beta\)Angle occupied by one phase belt
Coil spanslotsFull pitch when equal to \(n\)
📐
The Slot Angle
One pole pitch is 180 electrical degrees
\[\beta = \frac{180^{\circ}}{\text{no. of slots/pole}} = \frac{180^{\circ}}{n}\]

Note carefully that this is an electrical angle. One pole pitch always spans 180° electrical however many poles the machine has, so mechanical and electrical angles are related by \(\theta_{\text{elec}} = (P/2)\,\theta_{\text{mech}}\).

Two sides of any coil should be under two adjacent poles, that is, the coil span should equal one pole pitch. For maximum EMF the two sides of a coil should be one pole pitch — 180° electrical — apart, so that their EMFs add directly rather than partially cancelling.

The winding must be arranged in the armature slots so that it produces a sinusoidal EMF. That requirement, not merely the maximum EMF, is what drives the design decisions of the rest of this chapter.

1 Worked Example 19.1 — Winding Geometry

Problem. A three-phase, four-pole alternator has 36 slots. Find the slots per pole, the slot angle, the slots per pole per phase, the pole pitch, the phase spread, and the number of coils per phase in a double-layer winding.

Slots per pole.

\[n = \frac{S}{P} = \frac{36}{4} = 9 \text{ slots/pole}\]

Slot angle.

\[\beta = \frac{180^{\circ}}{n} = \frac{180^{\circ}}{9} = 20^{\circ} \text{ electrical}\]

Slots per pole per phase.

\[m = \frac{n}{q} = \frac{9}{3} = 3\]

Pole pitch. Nine slots, equivalent to 180° electrical. A full-pitch coil therefore lies in slots 1 and 10.

Phase spread.

\[m\beta = (3)(20^{\circ}) = 60^{\circ}\]

Coils per phase. A double-layer winding has one coil per slot, so \(36/3 = 12\) coils per phase.

Comment. The 60° phase spread is standard for a three-phase machine, and it is no accident: three belts of 60° fill the 180° of one pole pitch exactly. A machine with \(m = 1\) would be a concentrated winding — one slot per pole per phase, no distribution at all, and the crude waveform Section 19-1 warned against.

Section 19-3

Types of Armature Winding

A winding may be arranged in one layer or two, and this is the first choice a designer makes.

General arrangement of an alternator armature winding in slots around the stator bore
The general arrangement of an alternator armature winding.
Single-Layer Winding

The complete slot contains only one coil side of a coil.

Comparison of single-layer and double-layer slot arrangements
Single-layer and double-layer slot arrangements compared.

Example — single-layer, one-turn, full-pitch, 4-pole, 12-slot machine. Here there are 3 slots per pole, so 1 slot per pole per phase, and the pole pitch is 3 slots. For maximum EMF the two sides of a coil should be one pole pitch (180° electrical) apart, which gives:

  • \(R\)-phase: slot 1 \(\Rightarrow\) 4, 7 \(\Rightarrow\) 10

  • \(Y\)-phase: slot 3, that is 120° afterwards — since 3 slots = 180°, 2 slots = 120°

  • \(B\)-phase: slot 5 \(\Rightarrow\) 8, 11 \(\Rightarrow\) 2

The ends of the windings are joined to form a \(Y\)-connection.

Single-layer winding layout for a four-pole twelve-slot three-phase machine
Single-layer winding: 4 poles, 12 slots, one slot per pole per phase.
Star connection of the three phase windings at the neutral point
The three phases joined to form a star connection.
Concentric or Chain Winding
Concentric or chain winding, in which coils of different span are nested within one another
Concentric or chain winding.
  • Number of slots \(= 2 \times\) number of coils \(=\) number of coil sides.

  • The polar group of each phase is 360° electrical apart.

  • It is necessary to use two different shapes of coil to avoid fouling of the end connections.

  • Since polar groups of each phase are 360° apart, all such groups are connected in the same direction.

  • Disadvantage: short-pitched coils cannot be used.

Double-Layer Winding
Double-layer winding, with two coil sides per slot, one at the top and one at the bottom
Double-layer winding — two coil sides per slot.
  • Either wave-wound or lap-wound. This is the simplest and most commonly used arrangement.

  • The number of slots is a multiple of the number of poles and phases. For a 4-pole, 3-phase machine this permits 12, 24, 36, 48 and so on — multiples of \(4\times3 = 12\).

  • Number of slots = number of coils, all of the same shape. Each slot therefore contains two coil sides, one at the bottom and one at the top, and the coils overlap each other.

Example — 4-pole, 24-slot machine. The pole pitch is \(24/4 = 6\) slots. For maximum EMF the coils should be full-pitched, meaning one side of a coil sits in slot 1 and the other in slot 7, the two slots being one pole pitch — 180° — apart. Each phase then has \(24/3 = 8\) coils.

Double-layer winding diagram for one phase of a four-pole twenty-four-slot machine
Winding for one phase.
Complete three-phase wiring diagram for a four-pole twenty-four-slot double-layer winding
The complete wiring diagram for all three phases.
Why double-layer windings dominate. Every coil is identical, which makes them cheap to form and to insert. And because each slot holds two coil sides belonging to coils that start one pole pitch apart, the designer is free to choose any coil span — including a short one. Short-pitching is impossible in a concentric winding but trivial in a double-layer one, and as Section 19-4 shows, short-pitching is what makes the waveform good.
Section 19-4

Short-Pitch Windings

So far full-pitched coils have been assumed, in which one pole pitch equals 180°. In a 24-slot, 4-pole machine a full-pitched coil has its sides in slots 1 and 7.

A short-pitched or fractional-pitched coil is instead placed in slots 1 and 6, so that the coil span is \(5/6\) of a pole pitch. It falls short by \(1/6\) of a pole pitch, that is

\[\alpha = \frac{180^{\circ}}{6} = 30^{\circ}\]
A short-pitched coil, spanning five slots instead of the full six of a pole pitch
A short-pitched coil spanning 5/6 of a pole pitch.
Advantages
  • Saves copper in the end connections, since the coils are physically shorter.

  • Improves the waveform of the generated EMF, making it more nearly sinusoidal, and distorting harmonics are eliminated.

  • Due to the elimination of high-frequency harmonics, eddy-current and hysteresis losses are reduced, thereby increasing efficiency.

Disadvantage
  • The total voltage is somewhat reduced.

  • The induced voltages in the two sides of a short-pitched coil are slightly out of phase, so their resultant vector sum is less than their arithmetic sum.

As Section 19-5 shows, the loss is only about 3 % for the standard 5/6 pitch — a small price for the harmonic suppression it buys.

Section 19-5

The Pitch Factor

The pitch factor — also called the coil-span factor or chording factor — is defined as

\[k_c = \frac{\text{vector sum of the induced emf per coil}}{\text{arithmetic sum of the induced emf per coil}} \; \lt \; 1\]

Let \(E_s\) be the induced EMF in each side of the coil. For a full-pitched coil the two sides are exactly in phase, so the total induced EMF is simply \(2E_s\).

Phasor diagram showing the two coil-side EMFs of a short-pitched coil displaced by the chording angle, and their resultant
The two coil-side EMFs of a short-pitched coil, and their vector resultant.

If the coil is short-pitched by 30°, the two coil-side EMFs are 30° apart and their resultant is

\[\begin{aligned} E &= 2E_s\cos\frac{30^{\circ}}{2} = 2E_s\cos 15^{\circ} \\[4pt] k_c &= \frac{\text{vector sum}}{\text{arithmetic sum}} = \frac{E}{2E_s} = \frac{2E_s\cos 15^{\circ}}{2E_s} = \cos 15^{\circ} = 0.966 \end{aligned}\]
📏
The Pitch Factor
Half the chording angle, cosine of it
\[k_c = \cos\frac{\alpha}{2}\]

In general, if the coil span falls short by an angle \(\alpha\) electrical, then \(k_c = \cos(\alpha/2)\). Here \(\alpha\) is known as the chording angle, and a winding employing short-pitched coils is called a chorded winding.

Note: the value of \(\alpha\) will usually be given in a question; if it is not, assume \(k_c = 1\).

The harmonic pay-off. The \(n\)th space harmonic sees \(n\) times the electrical angle, so its pitch factor is

\[k_{cn} = \cos\frac{n\alpha}{2}\]

and this is where short-pitching earns its keep. A harmonic can be eliminated entirely by choosing \(\alpha\) so that \(n\alpha/2 = 90^{\circ}\).

Table 19.2 — Pitch factor by harmonic, for the standard 5/6 pitch (\(\alpha = 30^{\circ}\)).
Harmonic \(n\)\(n\alpha/2\)\(k_{cn}\)Effect
1 (fundamental)15°0.966Only 3.4 % lost
345°0.707Reduced 29 %
575°0.259Reduced 73 %
7105°−0.259Reduced 73 %
An exceptionally good bargain. Giving up 3.4 % of the fundamental removes nearly three-quarters of the fifth and seventh harmonics — the two that matter most, since the third and its multiples are already absent from the line voltage of a star-connected machine. Choosing \(\alpha = 36^{\circ}\) would kill the fifth exactly, since \(\cos(5\times18^{\circ}) = \cos 90^{\circ} = 0\), at a fundamental cost of 5 %. The 5/6 pitch is the usual compromise because it attacks both the fifth and the seventh at once.
2 Worked Example 19.2 — Pitch Factor and Harmonics

Problem. A 4-pole, 24-slot machine has its coils in slots 1 and 6. Find the coil span as a fraction of the pole pitch, the chording angle, and the pitch factor for the fundamental, third, fifth and seventh harmonics. What chording angle would eliminate the fifth harmonic entirely?

Coil span. The pole pitch is \(24/4 = 6\) slots. A coil in slots 1 and 6 spans 5 slots:

\[\text{span} = \frac{5}{6}\text{ of a pole pitch}\]

Chording angle. It falls short by \(1/6\) of a pole pitch:

\[\alpha = \frac{180^{\circ}}{6} = 30^{\circ}\]

Pitch factors.

\[k_{c1} = \cos 15^{\circ} = 0.9659, \qquad k_{c3} = \cos 45^{\circ} = 0.7071\]
\[k_{c5} = \cos 75^{\circ} = 0.2588, \qquad k_{c7} = \cos 105^{\circ} = -0.2588\]

Eliminating the fifth. Set \(5\alpha/2 = 90^{\circ}\):

\[\alpha = 36^{\circ} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad k_{c5} = \cos 90^{\circ} = 0\]

The fundamental would then be \(k_{c1} = \cos 18^{\circ} = 0.951\) — a 4.9 % loss instead of 3.4 %.

Comment. The negative sign on the seventh is not an error; it means the seventh-harmonic contribution reverses phase. Only the magnitude matters for waveform quality, so a 73 % reduction is achieved on both the fifth and the seventh. Note that with a 36° chording the seventh would give \(\cos 126^{\circ} = -0.588\) — worse than before. Killing one harmonic outright is rarely the best strategy.

Section 19-6

The Distribution Factor

In each phase the coils are not concentrated or bunched in one slot, but are distributed over a number of slots to form polar groups under each pole.

Coils of one phase distributed over several adjacent slots to form a polar group
The coils of one phase distributed over adjacent slots.
  • The coils of a phase are displaced from each other by a certain angle.

  • As a result the EMFs induced in the coil sides constituting a polar group are not in phase, but differ by the angular displacement of the slots.

Take a three-phase, four-pole machine with 36 slots. This gives 9 slots per pole, hence 3 slots per pole per phase, and the angular displacement between any two adjacent slots is

\[\beta = \frac{180^{\circ}}{9} = 20^{\circ}\ \text{electrical}\]

If the three coils were bunched in one slot, the total EMF induced in the three coil sides would be their arithmetic sum, \(3E_s\), where \(E_s\) is the EMF induced in one coil side. Since the coils are distributed, the individual EMFs have a phase difference of 20° with each other, and the resultant is their vector sum:

\[E = E_s\cos 20^{\circ} + E_s + E_s\cos 20^{\circ} = 2.88E_s\]
📊
The Distribution Factor
Also called the breadth factor or spread factor
\[K_d = \frac{\text{e.m.f. with distributed winding}}{\text{e.m.f. with concentrated winding}}\]

In the present case,

\[K_d = \frac{\text{e.m.f. in 3 slots/pole/phase}}{\text{e.m.f. in 1 slot/pole/phase}} = \frac{E}{3E_s} = \frac{2.88E_s}{3E_s} = 0.96\]
The General Case

Let

\[\begin{array}{cl} \beta = & \text{angular displacement between slots} \\ n = & \text{no. of slots/pole} \\ m = & \text{no. of slots/pole/phase} \\ m\beta = & \text{phase spread angle} \end{array}\]
Phasor construction for the general case, in which m coil EMFs each of magnitude E-s are displaced by beta and lie on a circle of radius r
The general phasor construction: \(m\) coil EMFs on a circle of radius \(r\).

The \(m\) coil EMFs, each displaced from the next by \(\beta\), form a regular polygon whose vertices lie on a circle of radius \(r\). Each coil EMF is a chord subtending \(\beta\) at the centre, and the resultant is a chord subtending \(m\beta\):

\[\begin{aligned} K_d &= \frac{\text{vector sum of coil emfs}}{\text{arithmetic sum of coil emfs}} = \frac{E_r}{mE_s} \\[6pt] &= \frac{2r\sin\left(m\beta/2\right)}{m\times 2r\sin\left(\beta/2\right)} \\[6pt] K_d &= \frac{\sin\left(m\beta/2\right)}{m\sin\left(\beta/2\right)} \end{aligned}\]

The radius \(r\) cancels, so the result depends only on how many coils there are and how far apart they sit.

As with the pitch factor, the \(n\)th harmonic sees \(n\) times the slot angle:

\[K_{dn} = \frac{\sin\left(nm\beta/2\right)}{m\sin\left(n\beta/2\right)}\]
3 Worked Example 19.3 — Distribution Factor Two Ways

Problem. For the machine of Example 19.1 (3-phase, 4-pole, 36 slots), find the distribution factor by direct phasor addition and by the general formula. Then find it for the fifth harmonic.

Direct addition. With \(m = 3\) and \(\beta = 20^{\circ}\), take the middle coil as reference:

\[E = E_s\cos 20^{\circ} + E_s + E_s\cos 20^{\circ} = E_s\left[2(0.9397) + 1\right] = 2.8794E_s\]
\[K_d = \frac{2.8794E_s}{3E_s} = 0.9598\]

By the general formula.

\[K_d = \frac{\sin\left(m\beta/2\right)}{m\sin\left(\beta/2\right)} = \frac{\sin 30^{\circ}}{3\sin 10^{\circ}} = \frac{0.5000}{3(0.17365)} = \frac{0.5000}{0.52094} = 0.9598 \;\checkmark\]

Fifth harmonic.

\[K_{d5} = \frac{\sin\left(5\times30^{\circ}\right)}{3\sin\left(5\times10^{\circ}\right)} = \frac{\sin 150^{\circ}}{3\sin 50^{\circ}} = \frac{0.5000}{3(0.76604)} = 0.2176\]

Comment. Distribution costs 4 % of the fundamental but removes 78 % of the fifth harmonic — the same kind of bargain as short-pitching, obtained by a completely independent mechanism. Used together, the two reduce the fifth harmonic to \(0.2588 \times 0.2176 = 5.6\,\%\) of what a concentrated full-pitch winding would give, while costing only 7 % of the fundamental.

Section 19-7

The Winding Factor

The two effects are independent and multiply:

🔑
The Winding Factor
The correction that has been missing since Chapter 8
\[k_w = k_c \times K_d\]

and the EMF equation of Chapters 8 and 10 becomes, for a real machine,

\[E_{\text{ph}} = 4.44\,k_w\,f\,N_{\text{ph}}\,\Phi\]

where \(N_{\text{ph}}\) is the number of turns in series per phase and \(\Phi\) the flux per pole.

Typical values of \(k_w\) for the fundamental lie between 0.90 and 0.96 in three-phase machines. The number looks like a small correction and is easy to forget, but omitting it overstates the EMF by 5 to 10 % — enough to make a machine unusable.

The same factor appears in the torque. Section 19-8 shows that \(k_w\) multiplies the mmf of the winding as well as its EMF, so it enters the torque expressions of Chapter 18 identically. A winding factor of 0.93 means the machine produces 93 % of the EMF and 93 % of the mmf of an ideal concentrated winding — which is exactly why the loss is accepted so readily. The harmonics it removes would otherwise cost far more in loss and torque ripple.
4 Worked Example 19.4 — A Complete Alternator EMF

Problem. A three-phase, 4-pole, 50 Hz star-connected alternator has 36 slots with a double-layer winding of 8 turns per coil, short-pitched by one slot. The flux per pole is 25 mWb. Find the winding factor, the phase EMF and the line EMF. Compare with the value obtained by ignoring the winding factor.

Geometry. From Example 19.1: \(n = 9\), \(\beta = 20^{\circ}\), \(m = 3\).

Pitch factor. Short-pitched by one slot means \(\alpha = \beta = 20^{\circ}\)... but here the coil is short by one slot out of nine, so

\[\alpha = 20^{\circ}, \qquad k_c = \cos 10^{\circ} = 0.9848\]

Distribution factor. From Example 19.3, \(K_d = 0.9598\).

Winding factor.

\[k_w = (0.9848)(0.9598) = 0.9452\]

Turns per phase. A double-layer winding has one coil per slot, so 12 coils per phase at 8 turns each:

\[N_{\text{ph}} = (12)(8) = 96 \text{ turns}\]

Phase EMF.

\[E_{\text{ph}} = 4.44\,k_w\,f\,N_{\text{ph}}\,\Phi = (4.44)(0.9452)(50)(96)(0.025) = 503.6~\mathrm{V}\]

Line EMF. Star-connected, so

\[E_L = \sqrt{3}\,E_{\text{ph}} = (1.732)(503.6) = 872.2~\mathrm{V}\]

Ignoring the winding factor.

\[E_{\text{ph}} = (4.44)(50)(96)(0.025) = 532.8~\mathrm{V}\]

The winding factor has reduced the EMF by \(1 - 0.9452 = 5.5\,\%\); put the other way, ignoring it would overstate the terminal voltage by \(532.8/503.6 - 1 = 5.8\,\%\).

Comment. Five to six percent is the difference between a machine that meets its specification and one that does not. The winding factor is not an optional refinement; it is part of the EMF equation for every real AC machine, and Chapter 73 uses exactly this calculation for alternator design.

Section 19-8

The MMF of a Distributed Winding

So far the winding factors have been derived from EMF. The same factors govern the mmf the winding produces, and this is what connects the chapter to the torque results of Chapter 18.

A single full-pitch concentrated coil of \(N\) turns carrying current \(i\) produces a rectangular mmf wave of amplitude \(Ni/2\) around the air gap. Distributing the winding over several slots replaces the rectangle by a staircase, which is a much closer approximation to a sinusoid.

090°180°270°360° electrical angle around the air gap mmf +1.5Ni −1.5Ni stepped mmf — 3 slots/pole/phase fundamental Each slot adds a step. More slots means a closer approach to a sinusoid.
The staircase mmf of a distributed winding and the fundamental it approximates.

Extracting the fundamental of the stepped wave gives the result used throughout machine analysis:

🌊
Fundamental MMF per Pole
The winding factor appears again
\[F_1 = \frac{4}{\pi}\left(\frac{k_w N_{\text{ph}}}{P}\right)i\]

The \(4/\pi\) is the fundamental of a rectangular wave; \(k_w\) accounts for distribution and chording exactly as it did for the EMF. Setting \(k_w = 1\) and \(P = 2\) recovers \(2Ni/\pi\), the fundamental of a single full-pitch coil's rectangle — the check worth doing.

This is the \(F_1\) and \(F_2\) that appeared in the torque expression \(T = -kF_1F_2\sin\delta\) of Section 18-7. The winding factor therefore reduces the torque in exactly the same proportion as the EMF, which is why a single number suffices for both.

5 Worked Example 19.5 — MMF of the Winding

Problem. For the alternator of Example 19.4 (\(k_w = 0.9452\), \(N_{\text{ph}} = 96\), \(P = 4\)), find the peak fundamental mmf per pole when the phase current is 20 A. What would a concentrated full-pitch winding of the same turns give?

Fundamental mmf.

\[F_1 = \frac{4}{\pi}\left(\frac{k_wN_{\text{ph}}}{P}\right)i = (1.2732)\frac{(0.9452)(96)}{4}(20)\]
\[F_1 = (1.2732)(22.68)(20) = 577.6~\mathrm{AT/pole}\]

Concentrated equivalent. With \(k_w = 1\):

\[F_1 = (1.2732)\frac{96}{4}(20) = (1.2732)(24)(20) = 611.1~\mathrm{AT/pole}\]

Comment. The distributed winding produces 5.5 % less fundamental mmf — precisely the same 5.5 % by which it produced less EMF in Example 19.4. That is not a coincidence but a consequence of reciprocity: a winding that links flux poorly also produces mmf poorly, in the same ratio.

What the table of Section 19-5 does not show is the harmonic mmf, which the distributed winding reduces by 70 to 80 %. Those harmonics would otherwise produce parasitic torques, noise and rotor surface losses — costs far exceeding 5.5 % of the fundamental.

Section 19-9

Applications

Alternator Design

The EMF equation with \(k_w\) fixes the turns per phase from the required terminal voltage — the central calculation of Chapter 73.

Harmonic Suppression

Chording and distribution together cut the fifth and seventh harmonics to a few percent, keeping the generated waveform within grid code limits without filters.

Induction Motor Windings

The same factors apply to the stator, and the harmonic mmfs they suppress are what cause the crawling and cogging treated in Chapter 65.

Copper Saving

Short-pitched coils have shorter end windings, reducing both copper mass and the \(I^{2}R\) loss in a part of the winding that contributes no EMF at all.

Noise and Vibration

Space-harmonic mmfs produce radial force waves that flex the stator. Suppressing them at the winding-design stage is far cheaper than damping them later.

Fractional-Slot Machines

Modern PM machines often use non-integer \(m\), giving high winding factors with very short end windings — the same theory applied with a fractional slot count.

Section 19-10

Summary and Key Formulas

  • Windings are distributed over several slots and usually short-pitched, to improve cooling, improve the waveform and even out the iron loading.

  • Key geometry: \(n = S/P\) slots per pole, \(\beta = 180^{\circ}/n\) slot angle, \(m = n/q\) slots per pole per phase, phase spread \(m\beta\).

  • DC machines have closed windings; alternator windings are open, with one end at neutral and the other brought out.

  • Double-layer windings dominate: identical coils, one per slot, two coil sides per slot, and short-pitching is possible. Concentric windings cannot be short-pitched.

  • A coil short-pitched by \(\alpha\) has pitch factor \(k_c = \cos(\alpha/2)\), and for the \(n\)th harmonic \(k_{cn} = \cos(n\alpha/2)\).

  • The distribution factor is \(K_d = \sin(m\beta/2)/\left[m\sin(\beta/2)\right]\), also called the breadth or spread factor.

  • The winding factor \(k_w = k_cK_d\) corrects the EMF equation to \(E_{\text{ph}} = 4.44k_wfN_{\text{ph}}\Phi\). Typical values are 0.90 to 0.96.

  • The same \(k_w\) multiplies the mmf: \(F_1 = (4/\pi)(k_wN_{\text{ph}}/P)i\), so torque is reduced in the same proportion as EMF.

  • The 3 to 7 % of fundamental given up buys a 70 to 80 % reduction in the fifth and seventh harmonics — a bargain by any measure.

Table 19.3 — Formulas introduced in this chapter.
QuantityFormulaNotes
Slots per pole\(n = S/P\)the pole pitch in slots
Slot angle\(\beta = 180^{\circ}/n\)electrical degrees
Slots/pole/phase\(m = n/q = S/(Pq)\)coils per phase belt
Electrical angle\(\theta_{\text{elec}} = (P/2)\theta_{\text{mech}}\)one pole pitch = 180° elec
Pitch factor\(k_c = \cos(\alpha/2)\)\(\alpha\) = chording angle
Pitch factor, harmonic\(k_{cn} = \cos(n\alpha/2)\)zero when \(n\alpha/2 = 90^{\circ}\)
Distribution factor\(K_d = \dfrac{\sin(m\beta/2)}{m\sin(\beta/2)}\)breadth factor
Distribution, harmonic\(K_{dn} = \dfrac{\sin(nm\beta/2)}{m\sin(n\beta/2)}\)strong harmonic reduction
Winding factor\(k_w = k_c K_d\)typically 0.90–0.96
EMF per phase\(E_{\text{ph}} = 4.44\,k_w f N_{\text{ph}}\Phi\)the corrected EMF equation
Line EMF (star)\(E_L = \sqrt{3}\,E_{\text{ph}}\)
Fundamental mmf\(F_1 = \dfrac{4}{\pi}\left(\dfrac{k_wN_{\text{ph}}}{P}\right)i\)AT per pole
Section 19-11

Common Mistakes

  • Confusing electrical and mechanical angles. The slot angle \(\beta = 180^{\circ}/n\) is electrical. In a four-pole machine one mechanical degree is two electrical degrees.

  • Using the full chording angle in the cosine. It is \(\cos(\alpha/2)\), not \(\cos\alpha\) — half the angle, because the resultant bisects the two coil-side phasors.

  • Forgetting the \(m\) in the denominator of \(K_d\). Without it the formula gives a number far greater than one.

  • Using degrees in a calculator set to radians. A perennial source of impossible winding factors.

  • Adding \(k_c\) and \(K_d\) instead of multiplying. The two effects are independent, so their factors multiply.

  • Omitting \(k_w\) from the EMF equation. This overstates the voltage by 5 to 10 %.

  • Confusing turns per coil with turns per phase. \(N_{\text{ph}}\) is turns in series per phase — coils per phase times turns per coil, divided by any parallel paths.

  • Counting coils wrongly in a double-layer winding. There is one coil per slot, not one per pair of slots.

  • Assuming a negative harmonic pitch factor is an error. It merely indicates a phase reversal; the magnitude is what matters.

  • Trying to short-pitch a concentric winding. Its geometry does not allow it — that is the disadvantage of the type.

Section 19-12

Chapter Review

Practice Problems

Always compute \(n\), \(\beta\) and \(m\) first — every other quantity follows from them.

  1. P19.1 A three-phase, 6-pole alternator has 54 slots. Find \(n\), \(\beta\), \(m\) and the phase spread.

    Show answer
    \[n = \frac{54}{6} = 9, \qquad \beta = \frac{180^{\circ}}{9} = 20^{\circ}, \qquad m = \frac{9}{3} = 3\]
    \[\text{phase spread} = m\beta = 60^{\circ}\]
    Identical to the 36-slot, 4-pole machine of Example 19.1 — the winding factors depend on \(n\) and \(m\), not on the absolute slot count.
  2. P19.2 Find the distribution factor for the machine of P19.1.

    Show answer
    \[K_d = \frac{\sin\left(3\times10^{\circ}\right)}{3\sin 10^{\circ}} = \frac{0.5000}{0.52094} = 0.9598\]
  3. P19.3 A coil spans 7 slots in a machine with a pole pitch of 9 slots. Find the chording angle and the pitch factor.

    Show answer
    The coil falls short by 2 slots out of 9, and each slot is \(180^{\circ}/9 = 20^{\circ}\):
    \[\alpha = 2\times20^{\circ} = 40^{\circ}, \qquad k_c = \cos 20^{\circ} = 0.9397\]
  4. P19.4 A three-phase, 4-pole, 24-slot alternator runs at 1500 rev/min with 0.05 Wb per pole and 10 turns per coil, double-layer, full-pitch. Find the frequency, \(k_w\) and the phase EMF.

    Show answer
    \[f = \frac{PN}{120} = \frac{(4)(1500)}{120} = 50~\mathrm{Hz}\]
    \[n = 6, \quad \beta = 30^{\circ}, \quad m = 2, \qquad K_d = \frac{\sin 30^{\circ}}{2\sin 15^{\circ}} = \frac{0.5000}{0.51764} = 0.9659\]
    Full-pitch, so \(k_c = 1\) and \(k_w = 0.9659\). With \(24/3 = 8\) coils per phase at 10 turns, \(N_{\text{ph}} = 80\):
    \[E_{\text{ph}} = (4.44)(0.9659)(50)(80)(0.05) = 857.7~\mathrm{V}\]
  5. P19.5 For the machine of P19.4, the coils are now short-pitched by one slot. Find the new \(k_w\) and phase EMF.

    Show answer
    \[\alpha = \beta = 30^{\circ}, \qquad k_c = \cos 15^{\circ} = 0.9659\]
    \[k_w = (0.9659)(0.9659) = 0.9330\]
    \[E_{\text{ph}} = (4.44)(0.9330)(50)(80)(0.05) = 828.5~\mathrm{V}\]
    A 3.4 % reduction, in exchange for the harmonic suppression of Table 19.2.
  6. P19.6 What chording angle eliminates the seventh harmonic, and what is the resulting fundamental pitch factor?

    Show answer
    \[\frac{7\alpha}{2} = 90^{\circ} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \alpha = \frac{180^{\circ}}{7} = 25.7^{\circ}\]
    \[k_{c1} = \cos 12.86^{\circ} = 0.9750\]
    Only 2.5 % of the fundamental lost. However the fifth would then give \(\cos 64.3^{\circ} = 0.4339\) — considerably worse than the 0.259 of a 5/6 pitch.
  7. P19.7 Find the fifth-harmonic distribution factor for a winding with \(m = 2\) and \(\beta = 30^{\circ}\).

    Show answer
    \[K_{d5} = \frac{\sin\left(5\times30^{\circ}\right)}{2\sin\left(5\times15^{\circ}\right)} = \frac{\sin 150^{\circ}}{2\sin 75^{\circ}} = \frac{0.5000}{1.9319} = 0.2588\]
    The fifth harmonic is reduced to a quarter, against a fundamental \(K_d\) of 0.9659.
  8. P19.8 A three-phase machine has \(k_w = 0.94\), \(N_{\text{ph}} = 120\) and 6 poles. Find the peak fundamental mmf per pole at 15 A.

    Show answer
    \[F_1 = \frac{4}{\pi}\left(\frac{k_wN_{\text{ph}}}{P}\right)i = (1.2732)\frac{(0.94)(120)}{6}(15)\]
    \[F_1 = (1.2732)(18.80)(15) = 359.0~\mathrm{AT/pole}\]
  9. P19.9 Explain why the winding factor reduces the torque by exactly the same proportion as the EMF.

    Show answer
    The winding factor measures how effectively the turns of a phase are aligned with the fundamental flux wave. A winding whose coils are spread out or chorded links less of the fundamental flux, so its EMF is reduced by \(k_w\). By the same geometry it also produces a fundamental mmf reduced by \(k_w\).

    Since torque follows the product of the two mmf waves, \(T \propto F_1F_2\sin\delta\), and \(F\) carries a factor \(k_w\), torque falls in the same ratio. This reciprocity is why one factor suffices for both calculations.

  10. P19.10 Why is a small loss of fundamental EMF accepted in order to suppress harmonics?

    Show answer
    The fundamental loss is 3 to 7 %, and can be recovered simply by adding a few more turns. The harmonics, if left in place, cause:
    • extra iron loss, since hysteresis and eddy-current loss rise steeply with frequency (Chapters 6 and 7);

    • parasitic torques — crawling and cogging in induction motors;

    • noise and vibration from harmonic radial force waves;

    • rotor surface loss, since harmonic fields sweep past the rotor at high relative speed;

    • possible non-compliance with grid distortion limits.

    None of these can be fixed by adding turns. A few percent of a recoverable quantity is traded for a large reduction in an unrecoverable one — which is why every AC machine of any size is both distributed and chorded.

Multiple-Choice Questions
  1. MCQ 1. The slot angle of a winding with 9 slots per pole is:
    (a) 9°   (b) 20°   (c) 40°   (d) 60°

    Show answer
    (b) 20°, from \(\beta = 180^{\circ}/9\). Note this is an electrical angle.
  2. MCQ 2. The pitch factor of a coil short-pitched by 30° is:
    (a) 0.866   (b) 0.966   (c) 0.500   (d) 1.000

    Show answer
    (b) 0.966 \(= \cos 15^{\circ}\) — half the chording angle.
  3. MCQ 3. The distribution factor is also known as the:
    (a) chording factor   (b) breadth factor   (c) form factor   (d) power factor

    Show answer
    (b) breadth factor, or spread factor.
  4. MCQ 4. A concentrated winding has a distribution factor of:
    (a) 0   (b) 0.5   (c) 0.955   (d) 1

    Show answer
    (d) 1. With \(m = 1\) the formula gives \(\sin(\beta/2)/\sin(\beta/2) = 1\) — nothing is lost because nothing is spread.
  5. MCQ 5. The winding factor is:
    (a) \(k_c + K_d\)   (b) \(k_cK_d\)   (c) \(k_c/K_d\)   (d) \(\sqrt{k_cK_d}\)

    Show answer
    (b) \(k_cK_d\) — the two effects are independent and multiply.
  6. MCQ 6. Short-pitching a winding:
    (a) increases the EMF   (b) reduces the EMF slightly and suppresses harmonics   (c) has no effect   (d) increases the harmonics

    Show answer
    (b) reduces the EMF slightly and suppresses harmonics — the central trade of the chapter.
  7. MCQ 7. Short-pitched coils cannot be used in a:
    (a) double-layer winding   (b) lap winding   (c) concentric winding   (d) wave winding

    Show answer
    (c) concentric winding — this is its principal disadvantage.
  8. MCQ 8. In a double-layer winding the number of coils equals the number of:
    (a) poles   (b) phases   (c) slots   (d) half the slots

    Show answer
    (c) slots. Each slot holds two coil sides belonging to two different coils.
  9. MCQ 9. To eliminate the fifth harmonic entirely, the chording angle should be:
    (a) 30°   (b) 36°   (c) 45°   (d) 60°

    Show answer
    (b) 36°, since \(5\alpha/2 = 90^{\circ}\) gives \(\cos 90^{\circ} = 0\).
  10. MCQ 10. Omitting the winding factor from the EMF equation causes the calculated voltage to be:
    (a) too low by 5–10 %   (b) too high by 5–10 %   (c) unchanged   (d) too high by 50 %

    Show answer
    (b) too high by 5–10 %, since \(k_w \lt 1\) always.
Conceptual Questions
  1. Give three reasons why a phase winding is distributed over several slots rather than concentrated in one.

  2. Define pole pitch, slot angle, slots per pole per phase and phase spread, and explain why the slot angle is an electrical rather than a mechanical angle.

  3. Compare single-layer, concentric and double-layer windings, and explain why the double-layer type dominates modern practice.

  4. Derive the pitch factor from the phasor diagram of a short-pitched coil, and explain how a chosen harmonic can be eliminated.

  5. Derive the distribution factor by the circle-and-chord construction, explaining why the radius cancels.

  6. Explain why the winding factor appears in both the EMF equation and the mmf expression, and what this implies for torque.

  7. Justify the trade of a few percent of fundamental EMF for a large reduction in harmonic content, identifying what each side of the trade costs.

Looking Ahead — the End of Part 1

Part 1 is complete. Nineteen chapters have built the subject from the magnetic circuit upward: how flux is established and what governs it (Chapters 2–5), what it costs in heat (6–7), how it behaves under alternating excitation (8) and without any excitation at all (9); then induction in its own right (10–14), and finally the energy methods that turn a magnetic field into force and torque (15–18), with this chapter supplying the winding factors that connect the ideal single coil to a real machine.

Everything from here is application. Part 2 begins at Chapter 20 with the DC machine — historically first, and conceptually the simplest because the commutator holds the torque angle at 90° and removes the complication of a moving field. Chapters 20 to 39 cover its construction, its commutator and armature windings, armature reaction, its generator and motor characteristics, starting, speed control, losses and testing.

The alternative answer to the unidirectional-torque problem — the rotating magnetic field of a polyphase winding — waits until Chapter 59, when the induction motor is taken up. The transformer, which is the same theory with no motion at all, occupies Part 3 from Chapter 40.