By the end of this chapter you should be able to:
State the general force and torque results and apply them to systems with any number of windings.
Explain why \(\tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) fails under saturation and what must replace it.
Resolve Maxwell stress into its normal and tangential components and state what each does.
Compute torque as an air-gap shear stress acting on the rotor surface.
Apply the sizing equation \(T = \sigma\pi D^{2}l/2\) and explain the \(D^{2}l\) rule.
Express torque in terms of the two mmf waves and the angle between them.
Separate alignment torque from reluctance torque in a real machine and state the ratio typical of each type.
Explain why torque density has improved so little in a century while power electronics has transformed.
The General Results
Chapters 15 to 17 built the energy method one case at a time. This chapter states the results in their general form and then turns them into something a designer can use.
The two force expressions established in Section 16-2 hold for any magnetic field system whatever — any number of windings, any geometry, linear or saturating:
Nothing in the derivation assumed linearity. These four expressions are exact, and everything else in this chapter is a special case or a reformulation of them.
What did assume linearity was the convenient form \(f = \tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}x\), which followed from writing \(W' = \tfrac{1}{2}Li^{2}\). Section 18-3 examines what happens when that step is not available.
Systems with Many Windings
With \(n\) windings, the coenergy of a linear system generalises the two-winding expression of Chapter 17 in the obvious way:
where \(L_{jj}\) is the self-inductance of winding \(j\) and \(L_{jk} = L_{kj}\) is the mutual inductance between windings \(j\) and \(k\). Differentiating gives the torque:
The double sum splits into \(n\) reluctance terms — one per winding, each carrying a factor \(\tfrac{1}{2}\) — and \(n(n-1)/2\) alignment terms, one for each pair of windings, each carrying no such factor because the pair appears twice in the double sum.
Setting \(n = 1\) recovers Chapter 16 and \(n = 2\) recovers Chapter 17, which is the check worth doing on any general formula. A three-phase machine has \(n = 4\) when the field winding is counted, giving four reluctance terms and six mutual terms — which is why machine analysis moves to the transformed coordinates of Part 5 rather than working with all ten.
Problem. A system has three windings on a cylindrical-rotor machine, so that all self-inductances are constant. At the operating point \(\mathrm{d}L_{12}/\mathrm{d}\theta = -0.090\), \(\mathrm{d}L_{13}/\mathrm{d}\theta = -0.050\) and \(\mathrm{d}L_{23}/\mathrm{d}\theta = -0.020\) H/rad, with currents \(i_1 = 6.0\) A, \(i_2 = 4.0\) A and \(i_3 = 3.0\) A. Find the torque.
Reluctance terms. All self-inductances are constant, so every \(\mathrm{d}L_{jj}/\mathrm{d}\theta = 0\) and these contribute nothing.
Alignment terms. There are three pairs:
Total.
Comment. Every pair of windings whose mutual inductance varies with angle contributes torque, whether or not the two are "supposed" to interact. In a three-phase machine this is why all three phases contribute simultaneously, and why the total torque can be steady even though each individual term pulsates — the subject of Chapter 59's rotating field.
When the Core Saturates
Chapter 15 warned that energy and coenergy diverge once the core saturates. The consequence for torque calculation is severe and is worth stating plainly.
\(T = +\partial W'/\partial\theta|_i\) — still exact. The definition \(W' = \int\lambda\,\mathrm{d}i\) makes no assumption about the shape of the characteristic.
\(T = -\partial W/\partial\theta|_{\lambda}\) — still exact, for the same reason.
\(T = \tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) — fails. It came from \(W' = \tfrac{1}{2}Li^{2}\), which is true only for a straight-line characteristic.
The tempting repair — define an apparent inductance \(L = \lambda/i\) at the operating point and carry on — does not work, for exactly the reason Worked Example 15.3 gave: \(\tfrac{1}{2}Li^{2}\) then equals half the rectangle \(\lambda i\), which is neither the energy nor the coenergy but their average. Differentiating the wrong quantity gives the wrong torque.
The correct procedure is unchanged in principle and only slightly more work in practice:
- Obtain \(\lambda(i,\theta)\) for the system, from a magnetisation curve or a field solution.
- Integrate to find the coenergy at the operating angle: \(W'(i,\theta) = \int_0^{i}\lambda(i',\theta)\,\mathrm{d}i'\).
- Differentiate with respect to \(\theta\), holding \(i\) constant.
Where \(\lambda\) is known only numerically — the usual case in finite-element design work — steps 2 and 3 are done numerically, evaluating the coenergy at two nearby angles and taking the difference.
Problem. A saturating system has the characteristic
Find the torque at \(i = 9.0\) A and \(\theta = 60^{\circ}\). Compare with the result of the (incorrect) apparent-inductance method.
Step 1 — coenergy. Writing \(k(\theta) = 0.60(1 + 0.40\cos\theta)\):
At \(\theta = 60^{\circ}\), \(\cos\theta = 0.500\) so \(k = 0.60(1.20) = 0.720\), and \(i^{3/2} = 27.0\):
Step 2 — differentiate. Only \(k\) depends on angle, with \(\mathrm{d}k/\mathrm{d}\theta = -0.24\sin\theta\):
The incorrect route. The apparent inductance is
The error.
Check. The field energy is \(W = \lambda i - W' = (2.160)(9.0) - 12.96 = 19.44 - 12.96 = 6.48\) J, so \(W' = 2W\) — the signature of a square-root characteristic, just as the square-law core of Example 15.3 gave the same ratio.
Comment. A quarter of the torque is a great deal to lose. Since machines are deliberately worked past the knee for economy (Chapter 6), saturation is the normal condition rather than an exception, and this is why modern machine design is done by finite-element field solution with numerical coenergy differencing rather than by inductance formulas.
Maxwell Stress
The energy method gives a total force but says nothing about where it acts. A complementary picture treats the magnetic field as exerting a stress on the surfaces it touches — which turns out to be the most useful way to think about a rotating machine.
At an iron surface the field exerts two stresses, and they do quite different jobs:
A tension along the flux lines, pulling the surfaces together. This is the magnetic pull of Chapter 16, and it is what closes a relay.
In a rotating machine it acts radially and produces no torque at all — only the bearing loads and the magnetic noise of Chapter 40.
A shear along the surface, arising when the flux crosses the gap at an angle rather than straight across.
This is the stress that produces torque. Every newton-metre a machine delivers is this stress acting on the rotor surface.
Torque as Air-Gap Shear
Once the torque is seen as a shear stress on a cylindrical surface, computing it is elementary mechanics.
Let the rotor have diameter \(D\) and axial length \(l\), so that its curved surface area is \(\pi D l\). If a mean tangential stress \(\sigma\) acts over that surface at a radius \(D/2\), the torque is
Torque is proportional to \(D^{2}l\) — that is, to the rotor volume — multiplied by a stress that the air gap can sustain. Since that stress is bounded by saturation, so is the torque per unit volume.
The quantity \(\sigma\) is called the air-gap shear stress or specific tangential force, and it is the single most useful figure of merit in machine design. Typical values are remarkably consistent across machine types:
| Machine class | \(\sigma\) (kN/m²) | Limited by |
|---|---|---|
| Small totally-enclosed motors | 4–12 | Cooling |
| Medium industrial motors | 12–25 | Cooling |
| Large air-cooled machines | 25–45 | Cooling |
| High-performance servo motors | 25–50 | Thermal, short duty |
| Liquid-cooled traction motors | 50–100 | Saturation and current density |
Compare Table 18.1 with the magnetic pressure of Chapter 16, which reaches 1300 kN/m² at saturation. The shear stress a machine actually achieves is fifty to a hundred times smaller. The reason is that the tangential component \(B_t\) is produced by the winding current, and the current is limited not by magnetics but by heat.
This explains a fact that puzzles students who have grown up with electronics. A motor built in 1930 and one built today have air-gap shear stresses within a factor of about two, because both are limited by how fast heat can be removed from a copper winding — a problem no amount of semiconductor progress touches. The gains of the last century have come from better cooling, better insulation and better control, not from a fundamentally better magnetic circuit.
The Machine Sizing Equation
Rearranging the shear-stress result gives the equation with which every machine design begins:
and since mechanical power is \(P = \omega T\),
Two consequences follow, and both are among the most useful facts in the subject:
Torque is set by rotor volume alone. Doubling the torque means doubling \(D^{2}l\), whatever the voltage, current or number of turns.
Power is set by volume times speed. A machine of given size delivers more power if it runs faster — which is why high-speed machines are smaller for the same rating, and why gearboxes exist.
The second point deserves emphasis. Halving the size of a motor while keeping its power means doubling its speed and fitting a 2:1 reduction gear. Whether that is worth doing is a question of cost, noise and reliability rather than electromagnetics — but the trade is always available, and it is why traction and aerospace drives run at speeds that would have seemed absurd in 1950.
Problem. A 4.0 kW motor runs at 1440 rev/min. Its rotor is 120 mm in diameter and 150 mm long. Find the torque, the air-gap shear stress, and the tangential flux density if \(B_n = 0.85\) T. Then find the rotor dimensions needed to double the torque at the same stress.
Torque.
Shear stress.
Comfortably inside the 4–12 kN/m² band of Table 18.1 for a small enclosed motor.
Tangential flux density. From \(\sigma = B_nB_t/\mu_0\):
Only 1.4 % of the normal component — the flux lines are tilted by less than a degree.
Doubling the torque. At the same stress, \(D^{2}l\) must double. Scaling both dimensions by a factor \(s\) multiplies \(D^{2}l\) by \(s^{3}\), so
Comment. A 26 % increase in every linear dimension for twice the torque. Note that nothing about the winding entered the calculation — not the voltage, not the number of turns, not the current. Those decide how the torque is delivered; the rotor volume decides how much there can be. This is why an experienced designer can estimate a machine's frame size from its torque rating alone, before any electrical design is done.
Torque from the Two MMF Waves
The shear-stress picture is physical but requires knowing the field. A third formulation, equivalent to both, expresses torque in terms of the two mmf distributions that produce it — and this is the form Part 5 uses throughout.
A machine's stator and rotor each set up an mmf wave around the air gap, of peak values \(F_1\) and \(F_2\), separated by an angle \(\delta\). Working the coenergy through the gap geometry gives
where \(P\) is the number of poles and \(g\) the effective air gap. The \(\sin\delta\) is the same alignment law as Chapter 17, now for distributed windings rather than a single coil.
Three features of this expression matter more than its exact constant:
Both mmfs appear as a product. Weakening either one weakens the torque proportionally — which is why field weakening reduces torque in Chapter 37.
The torque depends on the angle between them, not on their positions. Both waves may be rotating rapidly; only their relative displacement matters. This is what makes steady torque possible in an AC machine.
It is inversely proportional to the gap. A smaller gap gives more torque for the same mmf, which is why machine gaps are made as small as mechanical tolerance permits — often under a millimetre.
Problem. A four-pole machine has \(D = 0.25\) m, \(l = 0.20\) m and an effective gap of 1.2 mm. The stator and rotor mmf peaks are 3200 AT and 2800 AT, separated by 40°. Find the constant \(k\) and the torque.
The constant. With \(P = 4\), so \((P/2)^{2} = 4\):
Torque.
Cross-check by shear stress. From Section 18-5, this torque implies
which sits at the top of the liquid-cooled band in Table 18.1 — high but not impossible, and consistent with the large mmfs assumed.
Comment. Two quite different formulations agree, as they must. The mmf form is used when the windings are known and the field is not; the shear-stress form when the field is known and the windings are not. A designer moves between them constantly.
Alignment and Reluctance Torque Separated
Chapter 17 showed that a salient machine develops both kinds of torque. It is worth setting out, for each machine family, which component does the work.
| Machine | Alignment | Reluctance | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| DC machine | All | None | Commutator holds \(\delta\) at 90° |
| Cylindrical-rotor synchronous | All | None | Round rotor, no saliency |
| Salient-pole synchronous | 75–90 % | 10–25 % | Both terms present (Chapter 76) |
| Induction motor | All | None | Rotor mmf induced, not supplied |
| Interior-magnet PM motor | 60–80 % | 20–40 % | Saliency deliberately exploited |
| Synchronous reluctance | None | All | No rotor excitation at all |
| Switched reluctance | None | All | Current switched by position |
Problem. An interior-magnet motor develops \(T = 180\sin\delta + 70\sin2\delta\) N·m. Find the total torque and the percentage from each component at the angle of maximum torque. What fraction of the magnet would be needed if the same peak torque were obtained from alignment alone?
Angle of maximum torque. Setting \(\mathrm{d}T/\mathrm{d}\delta = 180\cos\delta + 140\cos2\delta = 0\) and using \(\cos2\delta = 2\cos^{2}\delta - 1\):
The two components there.
Percentages.
Magnet required without saliency. Alignment torque is proportional to magnet flux, so a purely alignment machine giving 217.0 N·m would need
Comment. A fifth of the magnet material saved, purely by shaping the rotor iron. Note also that the peak occurs at 62.9°, not 90° — the reluctance term is already past its own peak by then and falling, but it still contributes usefully. Designing the two to cooperate over the working range, rather than merely at one point, is what separates a good rotor lamination from a mediocre one.
Applications
The \(D^{2}l\) rule lets a designer pick a frame from the torque rating before any electrical design begins — the first calculation in every machine project.
Modern software computes torque by evaluating coenergy at two nearby rotor angles and differencing — the numerical form of Section 18-3, valid under full saturation.
Where volume is precious, designers raise \(\sigma\) with liquid cooling and raise speed to cut \(D^{2}l\) — both direct consequences of the sizing equation.
Flux barriers are shaped so that alignment and reluctance torque add over the working range, saving magnet material as Example 18.5 showed.
The normal stress \(B_n^{2}/2\mu_0\) produces no torque but does deform the stator at twice supply frequency — the origin of the hum treated in Chapter 40.
Torque varies as \(1/g\), so gap uniformity is a first-order design concern; eccentricity produces both torque ripple and an unbalanced magnetic pull on the bearings.
Summary and Key Formulas
The general results \(f = -\partial W/\partial x|_{\lambda}\) and \(f = +\partial W'/\partial x|_{i}\), with their rotational counterparts, are exact for any magnetic field system.
For \(n\) windings, \(T = \tfrac{1}{2}\sum_j i_j^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L_{jj}/\mathrm{d}\theta + \sum_{j\lt k}i_ji_k\,\mathrm{d}L_{jk}/\mathrm{d}\theta\) — self terms halved, mutual terms not.
Under saturation the coenergy derivative still holds but \(\tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) does not. Using an apparent \(L = \lambda/i\) gives a materially wrong answer.
Maxwell stress has a normal component \(B_n^{2}/2\mu_0\) which pulls radially and produces no torque, and a tangential component \(B_nB_t/\mu_0\) which produces all of it.
Torque as shear: \(T = \sigma\pi D^{2}l/2\), so torque is proportional to rotor volume.
The sizing equation \(D^{2}l = 2T/\sigma\pi = 2P/\sigma\pi\omega\) means torque needs volume and power needs volume times speed.
Achievable \(\sigma\) is 4 to 100 kN/m², fifty to a hundred times below the magnetic pressure, because it is limited by cooling rather than by saturation.
In terms of mmf waves, \(T = -kF_1F_2\sin\delta\) with \(k \propto Dl/g\) — proportional to both mmfs, dependent only on their relative angle, and inversely proportional to the gap.
Machine families differ in which component they use: DC, induction and round-rotor synchronous are pure alignment; reluctance machines are pure reluctance; salient and interior-magnet machines use both.
| Quantity | Formula | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| General force | \(f = +\left.\dfrac{\partial W'}{\partial x}\right|_{i} = -\left.\dfrac{\partial W}{\partial x}\right|_{\lambda}\) | exact, always |
| General torque | \(T = +\left.\dfrac{\partial W'}{\partial\theta}\right|_{i} = -\left.\dfrac{\partial W}{\partial\theta}\right|_{\lambda}\) | exact, always |
| Coenergy, \(n\) windings | \(W' = \tfrac{1}{2}\sum_j\sum_k L_{jk}i_ji_k\) | linear systems |
| Torque, \(n\) windings | \(T = \tfrac{1}{2}\sum_j i_j^{2}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}L_{jj}}{\mathrm{d}\theta} + \sum_{j\lt k}i_ji_k\dfrac{\mathrm{d}L_{jk}}{\mathrm{d}\theta}\) | linear systems |
| Normal stress | \(\sigma_n = \dfrac{B_n^{2}}{2\mu_0}\) | radial pull; no torque |
| Tangential stress | \(\sigma_t = \dfrac{B_nB_t}{\mu_0}\) | produces the torque |
| Torque as shear | \(T = \dfrac{\sigma\pi D^{2}l}{2}\) | rotor surface × radius |
| Sizing equation | \(D^{2}l = \dfrac{2T}{\sigma\pi} = \dfrac{2P}{\sigma\pi\omega}\) | first design step |
| Scaling | \(T \propto s^{3}\) for linear scale factor \(s\) | at constant \(\sigma\) |
| MMF-wave torque | \(T = -kF_1F_2\sin\delta\) | \(k = \dfrac{\pi}{2}\left(\dfrac{P}{2}\right)^{2}\dfrac{\mu_0Dl}{g}\) |
| Saturated systems | \(W' = \displaystyle\int_0^{i}\lambda(i',\theta)\,\mathrm{d}i'\), then differentiate | \(\tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) invalid |
Common Mistakes
Using \(\tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) on a saturated machine. It is a linear result. Example 18.2 showed a 25 % error.
Putting a factor of one half on the mutual terms. Self terms carry \(\tfrac{1}{2}\); mutual terms do not, because each pair appears twice in the double sum.
Thinking the normal stress produces torque. It acts radially and contributes nothing but bearing load and noise.
Confusing magnetic pressure with air-gap shear stress. The first reaches 1300 kN/m²; the second rarely exceeds 100. They differ by the ratio \(B_t/B_n\), which is a few percent.
Expecting torque to depend on the winding details. At the sizing stage it depends only on rotor volume and shear stress.
Confusing the torque and power sizing rules. \(D^{2}l\) is set by torque; power brings speed into it.
Scaling a machine by \(D\) alone. Torque goes as \(D^{2}l\), so uniform scaling gives \(s^{3}\) — a 26 % size increase for double torque, not 41 %.
Believing a larger air gap is safer. Torque varies as \(1/g\), so gaps are made as small as mechanical tolerance allows.
Assuming all machines use alignment torque. Reluctance and switched-reluctance machines use none at all.
Adding alignment and reluctance peaks directly. They peak at different angles, so the total peak is less than the sum and occurs somewhere between.
Chapter Review
Where a machine is described by its dimensions, check the implied shear stress against Table 18.1 — an answer far outside that range signals an error.
P18.1 A machine develops 150 N·m from a rotor 180 mm in diameter and 220 mm long. Find the air-gap shear stress and comment.
Show answer
Squarely in the medium-industrial band of Table 18.1, so the design is plausible.\[\sigma = \frac{2T}{\pi D^{2}l} = \frac{2(150)}{\pi(0.180)^{2}(0.220)} = \frac{300}{0.02240} = 13\,400~\mathrm{N/m^{2}} = 13.4~\mathrm{kN/m^{2}}\]P18.2 A 22 kW motor runs at 2900 rev/min with \(\sigma = 20\) kN/m². Find the required \(D^{2}l\), and the dimensions if \(l = 1.2D\).
Show answer
\[\omega = \frac{2\pi(2900)}{60} = 303.7~\mathrm{rad/s}, \qquad T = \frac{22\,000}{303.7} = 72.44~\mathrm{N\,m}\]With \(l = 1.2D\), \(1.2D^{3} = 2.306\times10^{-3}\), so\[D^{2}l = \frac{2T}{\sigma\pi} = \frac{2(72.44)}{\left(20\,000\right)\pi} = 2.306\times10^{-3}~\mathrm{m^{3}}\]\[D = \left(1.922\times10^{-3}\right)^{1/3} = 0.1244~\mathrm{m} \approx 124~\mathrm{mm}, \qquad l = 149~\mathrm{mm}\]P18.3 In a machine gap \(B_n = 0.90\) T and \(B_t = 0.025\) T. Find the normal and tangential stresses and their ratio.
Show answer
\[\sigma_n = \frac{(0.90)^{2}}{2\left(4\pi\times10^{-7}\right)} = 3.223\times10^{5}~\mathrm{N/m^{2}} = 322~\mathrm{kN/m^{2}}\]\[\sigma_t = \frac{(0.90)(0.025)}{4\pi\times10^{-7}} = 1.790\times10^{4}~\mathrm{N/m^{2}} = 17.9~\mathrm{kN/m^{2}}\]The radial pull is eighteen times the useful shear — and does no work at all.\[\frac{\sigma_n}{\sigma_t} = \frac{322}{17.9} = 18.0\]P18.4 A four-winding system has all self-inductances constant. How many torque terms are there, and of what kind?
Show answer
With constant self-inductances, all four reluctance terms vanish. The mutual terms numberso there are six alignment terms — one for each pair of windings — and no reluctance terms.\[\frac{n(n-1)}{2} = \frac{(4)(3)}{2} = 6\]P18.5 A saturating system has \(\lambda = k(\theta)\sqrt{i}\). Show that the coenergy is twice the field energy, whatever \(k\) and \(i\).
Show answer
\[W' = \int_0^{i}k\sqrt{i'}\,\mathrm{d}i' = \tfrac{2}{3}k\,i^{3/2}\]\[W = \lambda i - W' = k\sqrt{i}\cdot i - \tfrac{2}{3}k i^{3/2} = k i^{3/2}\left(1 - \tfrac{2}{3}\right) = \tfrac{1}{3}k i^{3/2}\]The ratio depends only on the exponent of the characteristic, not on the operating point.\[\frac{W'}{W} = \frac{2/3}{1/3} = 2\]P18.6 A motor is redesigned with every linear dimension increased by 15 %. By what factor does its torque rise, at constant shear stress?
Show answer
A 52 % increase in torque for a 15 % increase in size — the strong reward for volume that makes machines scale so favourably.\[\frac{T'}{T} = s^{3} = (1.15)^{3} = 1.521\]P18.7 A salient machine has \(T = 200\sin\delta + 50\sin2\delta\) N·m. Find the maximum torque and the share from each component.
Show answer
Setting \(200\cos\delta + 100\cos2\delta = 0\):\[200\cos^{2}\delta + 200\cos\delta - 100 = 0 \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \cos\delta = 0.3660\]\[\delta_{\max} = 68.5^{\circ}, \qquad T_{\text{align}} = 200(0.9306) = 186.1, \qquad T_{\text{rel}} = 50(0.6812) = 34.1\]\[T_{\max} = 220.2~\mathrm{N\,m} \quad (84.5\,\% \text{ alignment}, \ 15.5\,\% \text{ reluctance})\]P18.8 Two machines have the same rotor volume, but one runs at 1500 rev/min and the other at 3000. Compare their power ratings.
Show answer
Equal volume at equal shear stress means equal torque. Since \(P = \omega T\) and the speed is doubled, the faster machine delivers twice the power from the same amount of active material.This is why high-speed machines are attractive wherever a gearbox is acceptable, and why direct-drive low-speed machines — wind turbines, ship propulsion — are so large.
P18.9 Explain why an air-gap shear stress of 20 kN/m² is respectable, when Chapter 16 showed the gap can support 1300 kN/m² of magnetic pressure.
Show answer
The two are different components of the same stress. Magnetic pressure uses \(B_n\), which saturation limits to about 2 T; shear uses the product \(B_nB_t\), and \(B_t\) is produced by the winding current.That current is limited by heat removal, not by magnetics, so \(B_t\) stays at a few percent of \(B_n\) and the shear stress at a few percent of the pressure. Machine torque density is a thermal problem wearing a magnetic disguise, which is why liquid cooling buys so much.
P18.10 A designer proposes doubling a motor's air gap to ease manufacturing tolerances. What happens to the torque at constant mmf, and what would have to change to restore it?
Show answer
Since \(k \propto 1/g\), doubling the gap halves the torque at the same mmfs.To restore it, the product \(F_1F_2\) must double — for example by increasing both mmfs by \(\sqrt{2} = 1.41\), which raises the copper loss by a factor of two and worsens the thermal problem that already limits \(\sigma\). This is why machine air gaps are made as small as the bearings and shaft stiffness permit, often well under a millimetre in small machines.
MCQ 1. The expression \(T = \tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) is valid:
(a) always (b) only for linear magnetic circuits (c) only under saturation (d) only for two windingsShow answer
(b) only for linear magnetic circuits. The coenergy derivative remains valid always.MCQ 2. In the \(n\)-winding torque expression, the mutual terms carry a factor of:
(a) \(\tfrac{1}{2}\) (b) 1 (c) 2 (d) \(n\)Show answer
(b) 1. Each pair appears twice in the double sum, cancelling the half.MCQ 3. The torque of a rotating machine is produced by the:
(a) normal component of Maxwell stress (b) tangential component (c) both equally (d) neitherShow answer
(b) the tangential component \(B_nB_t/\mu_0\). The normal component acts radially.MCQ 4. Torque in a rotating machine is proportional to:
(a) \(Dl\) (b) \(D^{2}l\) (c) \(Dl^{2}\) (d) \(D^{3}\)Show answer
(b) \(D^{2}l\) — the rotor volume, from \(T = \sigma\pi D^{2}l/2\).MCQ 5. A typical air-gap shear stress for a medium industrial motor is about:
(a) 200 N/m² (b) 20 kN/m² (c) 200 kN/m² (d) 2 MN/m²Show answer
(b) 20 kN/m², from Table 18.1.MCQ 6. Air-gap shear stress is limited principally by:
(a) saturation of the iron (b) heat removal from the winding (c) the supply voltage (d) bearing frictionShow answer
(b) heat removal from the winding, which caps the current and hence \(B_t\).MCQ 7. Doubling the machine's speed at constant rotor volume:
(a) doubles the torque (b) doubles the power (c) halves the power (d) changes neitherShow answer
(b) doubles the power. Torque depends on volume, and \(P = \omega T\).MCQ 8. The torque from two mmf waves varies with the air gap as:
(a) \(g\) (b) \(1/g\) (c) \(1/g^{2}\) (d) independent of \(g\)Show answer
(b) \(1/g\), which is why gaps are kept as small as tolerance allows.MCQ 9. A synchronous reluctance motor produces its torque from:
(a) alignment only (b) reluctance only (c) both (d) induced rotor currentsShow answer
(b) reluctance only. The rotor has no excitation of its own.MCQ 10. Scaling every linear dimension of a machine by 1.26 multiplies its torque by:
(a) 1.26 (b) 1.59 (c) 2.0 (d) 2.52Show answer
(c) 2.0, since \(T \propto s^{3}\) and \((1.26)^{3} = 2.0\).
State the general force and torque results and explain what, if anything, they assume about the magnetic material.
Explain why \(\tfrac{1}{2}i^{2}\,\mathrm{d}L/\mathrm{d}\theta\) fails under saturation, and describe the correct procedure when \(\lambda(i,\theta)\) is known only numerically.
Resolve Maxwell stress into its two components and explain what each does in a rotating machine.
Derive \(T = \sigma\pi D^{2}l/2\) and explain why torque depends on rotor volume rather than on winding details.
Explain why the achievable shear stress is so much smaller than the magnetic pressure, and what this implies about improving torque density.
Explain why the mmf-wave form of torque depends only on the angle between the two waves, and why this matters for AC machines.
An interior-magnet motor obtains a quarter of its torque from reluctance. Explain the commercial significance and how the rotor is designed to achieve it.
The theory of force and torque is complete. Everything from here is a matter of arranging conductors, iron and excitation so that the results of this chapter can be realised in a machine that can actually be built and cooled.
Chapter 19 takes the first step by replacing the single coil of Chapter 17 with a winding distributed over many slots. Spreading a winding reduces its effective mmf slightly — by the distribution factor — and short-pitching the coils reduces it again by the pitch factor, but both improve the waveform enormously by suppressing harmonics. Their product, the winding factor \(k_w\), appears in every EMF and torque equation from Chapter 23 onward.
Chapter 19 closes Part 1. From Chapter 20 the machines themselves begin, starting with the DC machine — which solves the unidirectional-torque problem of Section 17-9 by the second method, switching the armature current with a commutator. The other answer, the rotating magnetic field produced by a three-phase winding, is reached in Chapter 59 when the induction motor is taken up.