§ 9.1SCR: Characteristics & Two-Transistor Model
The Silicon Controlled Rectifier (thyristor) is a four-layer P-N-P-N, three-terminal (Anode, Cathode, Gate) latching switch — the workhorse of high-power control (kV, kA).
V–I characteristic (three regions)
- Forward blocking (V_AK > 0, gate open): only small leakage until the forward break-over voltage V_BO; J₂ blocks.
- Forward conduction (latched): after triggering, V_AK drops to ~1–1.5 V, large current flows, device acts as a closed switch; negative-resistance transition between the two.
- Reverse blocking (V_AK < 0): like a reverse diode until reverse breakdown V_BR (J₁, J₃ block).
Two-transistor (regenerative) model — the key explainer
Split the PNPN into a PNP (Q₁) + NPN (Q₂) with cross-coupled collector–base:
Latch (turn-on) condition
$$ I_A = \frac{\alpha_2 I_G + I_{CO}}{1 - (\alpha_1 + \alpha_2)} \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \text{turns ON (regenerative) when } \alpha_1 + \alpha_2 \to 1 $$
Gate current raises α₂ (α rises with current) → loop gain reaches 1 → each transistor drives the other into saturation → latch. Once latched, the gate loses control.
Key currents & turn-off
- Latching current I_L: minimum anode current to stay on just after triggering (gate still applied); holding current I_H: minimum to remain on (I_L ≈ 2–3 × I_H).
- Turn-off = commutation (drop I_A below I_H): natural/line commutation (AC reverses each half cycle — phase-controlled rectifiers) or forced commutation (DC circuits: a charged capacitor / LC momentarily reverse-biases or zeros I_A — choppers, inverters). Turn-off time t_q (reverse + gate-recovery) defines slow vs fast (inverter-grade) SCRs.
- Turn-on methods: gate triggering (normal), plus forward over-voltage, dv/dt, light (LASCR), and temperature (all undesired — see §9.5).
- Ratings: V_DRM/V_RRM, I_T(avg)/I_T(rms), I²t surge, di/dt & dv/dt limits.
- GTO (gate turn-off thyristor): a negative gate pulse turns it off — used in traction inverters before IGBTs.
UGC NET focus
α₁ + α₂ = 1 latch condition; gate loses control after firing; I_L vs I_H (latching > holding); SCR off only by commutation; on-state drop ~1.5 V; natural vs forced commutation contexts.
§ 9.2DIAC & TRIAC
DIAC (DIode AC switch)
- Two-terminal, bidirectional three-layer (or 5-layer) device — no gate; conducts in either direction once |V| exceeds the break-over voltage V_BO (~30 V), then exhibits a negative-resistance snap (V drops ~5 V).
- Symmetrical V–I (breaks over both polarities). Chief use: triggering device for the TRIAC gate — provides a sharp current pulse at a controlled phase angle in dimmer/speed circuits.
TRIAC (TRIode AC switch)
UGC NET focus
DIAC = bidirectional, gateless, triggers the TRIAC; TRIAC = two anti-parallel SCRs, both half-cycles; most-sensitive quadrants I/III; DIAC–RC phase control for dimmers; TRIAC weaknesses vs SCR pair.
§ 9.3Power Transistors: BJT, MOSFET, IGBT
Power switching devices — the comparison the exam wants
| Property | Power BJT | Power MOSFET | IGBT |
| Control | current (base) | voltage (gate, ~0 power) | voltage (gate) |
| Switching speed | moderate (storage delay) | fastest (MHz) | fast (tens of kHz) |
| Conduction drop | low V_CE(sat) | R_DS(on)·I — rises with V-rating | low V_CE(sat) (BJT-like) |
| Voltage / current reach | moderate | low-V, high-f | high-V, high-I (up to kV/kA) |
| Temperature coeff. | negative (hot-spot/2nd breakdown risk) | positive (easy paralleling) | positive (newer) |
| Sweet spot | legacy | SMPS, low-V high-f | motor drives, inverters, traction |
- Safe Operating Area (SOA): the V–I–time envelope; BJTs suffer second breakdown (current crowding/thermal runaway) → restricted SOA; MOSFETs are largely free of it (positive TC spreads current) — a recurring MCQ.
- MOSFET = majority-carrier, no storage time, body diode included; gate is capacitive (drive current only to charge C_iss — Miller plateau during switching).
- IGBT = MOS gate + BJT output (voltage-driven input, conductivity-modulated low-drop output) → combines MOSFET ease of drive with BJT low conduction loss at high voltage; tail current limits f_sw. The dominant device in EV/industrial inverters.
- SiC MOSFET / GaN HEMT (Unit-1 §1.17) now extend f_sw, voltage and efficiency beyond Si.
UGC NET focus
MOSFET voltage-driven/fastest/positive-TC/no-second-breakdown; BJT second breakdown; IGBT = MOS input + BJT output (high-power inverters); paralleling ease of MOSFETs; SOA meaning.
§ 9.4Thyristor Protection: Over-Voltage & Over-Current
Over-voltage protection
- Sources: switching/commutation transients, lightning, supply spikes; exceeding V_DRM can falsely fire or destroy the device.
- Remedies: RC snubber across the SCR (limits dv/dt and absorbs transient energy — also §9.5), metal-oxide varistor (MOV) / selenium suppressor / TVS clamping the line, crowbar (an SCR that fires to short the supply into a fuse on over-voltage), and voltage-grading networks for series strings.
Over-current protection
- Sources: load short, commutation failure, overload. SCRs have low thermal mass → act fast.
- Remedies: fast-acting (semiconductor) HRC fuses with I²t coordination — the fuse I²t must be less than the SCR's withstand I²t so the fuse clears first; magnetic circuit breakers for slower overloads; current-limiting reactor (series L) caps di/dt and peak fault current; electronic over-current relays gating the trigger off.
- Series/parallel operation: voltage-equalizing resistors + RC for series strings; current-sharing reactors + matched devices for parallel.
- Thermal: heat sinks, junction-to-case thermal resistance budget \( T_J = T_A + P\theta_{JA} \); forced-air/liquid cooling for high power.
UGC NET focus
RC snubber + MOV + crowbar for over-voltage; semiconductor fuse I²t-coordination (fuse clears before SCR) for over-current; series-L limits di/dt; voltage-grading for series strings; crowbar = SCR shorting into a fuse.
§ 9.5SCR Triggering: dv/dt & di/dt
dv/dt (false turn-on) and its snubber
di/dt (turn-on current rate)
- At turn-on, conduction starts in a small area near the gate and spreads (plasma spreading velocity ~50–100 µm/µs). If anode current rises faster than the conducting region grows → local hot spot → device failure.
- Cure: series inductor (di/dt reactor / saturable reactor) in the anode line limits \( di/dt = V/L \); interdigitated/amplifying gates speed up area spreading. Manufacturer's di/dt rating must not be exceeded.
Memory hook
C for dv/dt, L for di/dt. Snubber capacitor tames voltage rate (false firing); series inductor tames current rate (hot-spot). The snubber R does double duty: damping and limiting the snubber-capacitor discharge.
UGC NET focus
dv/dt → capacitive false turn-on → RC snubber; di/dt → localized heating → series L; i = C·dv/dt mechanism; why R_s is needed (discharge/damping); the C-vs-L memory hook is a classic MCQ.
§ 9.6Gate Triggering: Single Pulse & Train of Pulses
- Gate requirements: the gate pulse must exceed I_GT/V_GT, stay within the safe gate-power locus, and persist until anode current exceeds the latching current I_L — otherwise the SCR fails to stay on. Steep-front pulses reduce turn-on di/dt stress and spread; pulse amplitude ≥ a few × I_GT for reliability.
- Triggering circuits: RC phase-shift (simple, lossy), UJT relaxation oscillator (the classic — intrinsic standoff ratio η ≈ 0.5–0.8; \( f = 1/[RC\ln(1/(1-\eta))] \); fires near V_P = ηV_BB + V_D), PUT, ramp-comparator, and isolated pulse-transformer / optocoupler gate drives.
Single pulse vs train of pulses (the named comparison)
Single-pulse vs pulse-train gating
| Single (continuous) pulse | Train of pulses (carrier/high-frequency) |
| Form | one wide gate pulse per cycle | burst of narrow pulses (1–10 kHz) over the desired conduction window |
| Gate dissipation | higher (long pulse) | lower (short pulses, low average) |
| Pulse-transformer size | large (avoids core saturation on long pulse) | small (short pulses don't saturate the core) |
| Inductive / discontinuous load | may fail to latch if I_A rises slowly past I_L within the pulse | re-fires repeatedly → reliable latching as current builds |
| Use | resistive loads, simple drives | inductive loads, TRIACs, isolated drives — the preferred method |
- Why a train wins for inductive loads: with a lagging current the anode current may not reach I_L during a single short pulse — repeated pulses keep re-attempting the latch until conduction is established; also eases pulse-transformer design and gate heating.
UGC NET focus
Gate pulse must last until I_A > I_L; UJT relaxation oscillator + intrinsic standoff ratio η; pulse-train advantages (low gate dissipation, small pulse transformer, reliable latch on inductive loads); pulse-transformer isolation.
§ 9.7DC Motors: Construction & Speed Control
Construction & basics
- Stator field (poles/permanent magnet) + rotor armature + commutator + brushes (mechanical inverter keeping torque unidirectional). Back-EMF \( E_b = k\phi N \); torque \( T = k\phi I_a \); terminal \( V = E_b + I_aR_a \).
- Types: shunt (≈ constant speed), series (high starting torque, speed ∝ 1/load — traction, starters), compound; separately excited (precise control).
Speed equation — the control map
$$ N = \frac{V - I_aR_a}{k\phi} \;\Rightarrow\; \text{three knobs: } V,\ R_a\ (\text{added}),\ \phi $$
- Armature-voltage control (V): speed ∝ V below base speed, constant torque — the modern method via a controlled rectifier (phase-controlled SCR bridge) for AC supply or a DC chopper (PWM, duty D → V_o = D·V_in) for DC supply. Smooth, efficient.
- Field (flux) control (φ): weaken field → speed above base, constant power region; limited range, simple/cheap.
- Armature-resistance control (R_a added): reduces speed but wastes power in the resistor (poor efficiency) — legacy.
- Four-quadrant operation, regenerative braking (return energy to supply) with reversible converters.
- BLDC (electronic commutation, no brushes — reliability, efficiency) increasingly replaces brushed DC.
UGC NET focus
N = (V − I_aR_a)/kφ and the three control knobs; armature control = below base (constant torque), field weakening = above base (constant power); chopper V_o = D·V_in; series motor high starting torque; why R_a control is inefficient.
§ 9.8AC Motors: Construction & Speed Control
Synchronous speed & slip
$$ N_s = \frac{120f}{P}\ \text{rpm}; \qquad \text{slip } s = \frac{N_s - N}{N_s}; \qquad N = N_s(1 - s) $$
Induction motor (the industrial workhorse)
- Three-phase stator → rotating field; squirrel-cage rotor (rugged, cheap) or wound rotor (slip-ring); rotor runs at slip (2–5% full load) — induction, asynchronous. Single-phase versions need a starting auxiliary (capacitor-start, split-phase, shaded-pole).
- Speed-control methods:
- V/f control (VFD — the dominant method): vary frequency f (changes N_s) while keeping V/f constant to hold flux → wide smooth range, constant torque; realized by a rectifier → DC link → IGBT PWM inverter (power-electronics tie-in).
- Pole-changing (discrete speeds), stator-voltage control (fans), rotor-resistance control (wound rotor — like DC R_a, lossy), slip-recovery (Scherbius) schemes.
Synchronous motor
- Runs exactly at N_s (zero slip); needs DC field + starting means; power-factor correction by over-excitation (synchronous condenser); constant-speed drives.
Universal (series AC/DC) motor: high speed, light tools/appliances — TRIAC phase-controlled (§9.2). Stepper/servo for precise positioning (Unit-6 §6.17).
UGC NET focus
N_s = 120f/P and slip s = (N_s−N)/N_s numericals; V/f (VFD) constant-flux frequency control = the modern AC method; squirrel-cage ruggedness; synchronous motor zero slip + PF correction; rectifier-DClink-PWM inverter chain.
§ 9.9Switched-Mode Power Supply (SMPS)
An SMPS regulates by switching the pass device fully ON/OFF at high frequency (tens of kHz–MHz) and filtering, instead of dissipating the difference in a linear pass transistor. The switch is in saturation or cutoff → low loss → 70–95% efficiency, small high-frequency magnetics, light weight.
Non-isolated DC–DC converters (duty cycle D = t_on/T, CCM)
| Topology | Output | Relation |
| Buck (step-down) | V_o < V_in | \( V_o = D\,V_{in} \) |
| Boost (step-up) | V_o > V_in | \( V_o = \dfrac{V_{in}}{1 - D} \) |
| Buck–Boost (inverting) | either, inverted | \( V_o = -\dfrac{D}{1 - D}V_{in} \) |
| Ćuk | inverting, low ripple | same ratio as buck–boost, capacitor energy transfer |
- Isolated (transformer) topologies: flyback (cheap, < ~150 W — stores energy in the transformer gap, chargers/adapters), forward (single-switch, mid-power), push–pull / half-bridge / full-bridge (high power, better core utilization). Transformer gives isolation + multiple/turns-ratio outputs.
- Regulation loop: output sampled → error amp vs reference → PWM comparator vs sawtooth → adjusts duty cycle (voltage-mode) or peak current (current-mode); optocoupler crosses the isolation barrier.
- Building blocks: switch (MOSFET/IGBT), fast diode (Schottky/synchronous rectifier), inductor (energy storage), output capacitor (ripple), high-f transformer. Higher f_sw → smaller L, C, transformer but more switching loss/EMI; soft-switching (ZVS/ZCS resonant) reduces both.
SMPS vs linear regulator — the certain comparison
| Linear | SMPS |
| Efficiency | low (≈ V_o/V_in, 30–50%) | high (70–95%) |
| Heat / size / weight | large heatsink, heavy (50 Hz transformer) | small, light |
| Noise / ripple | very low, clean | switching noise / EMI (needs filtering) |
| Step-up? | no (only step-down) | yes (boost/buck-boost) |
| Complexity / cost | simple, cheap | complex control |
UGC NET focus
Buck V_o = DV_in, boost V_in/(1−D), buck-boost −D/(1−D) numericals; SMPS efficiency & size advantages; flyback = isolated low-power; PWM duty-cycle regulation; switch in cutoff/saturation = low loss; EMI as the downside.
§ 9.10Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)
A UPS supplies the load through a stored-energy path (battery + inverter) so power is maintained during mains failure, sag, or surge. Core chain: rectifier/charger → battery → inverter → load, with a transfer/static switch and bypass.
UPS topologies — the discriminating table
| Type | Normal-mode path | Transfer time | Traits / use |
| Offline / standby | mains directly to load; inverter idle, battery charging | finite (~2–10 ms) | cheapest; home PCs; no conditioning |
| Line-interactive | mains via an autotransformer/AVR (buck–boost taps); inverter bidirectional | short | voltage regulation without battery use; SOHO/servers |
| Online / double-conversion | always rectifier→battery→inverter (AC→DC→AC) — load never sees raw mains | zero (no break) | best conditioning & isolation; data centres, medical, critical loads; lower efficiency, costlier |
- Online UPS rationale: continuous conversion regenerates a clean sine independent of input quality → zero transfer time, full conditioning; static bypass handles overload/fault.
- Battery: VRLA/Li-ion; backup time = (battery Wh × efficiency)/load W; sized for ride-through to generator start or graceful shutdown.
- Inverter output quality: pure sine (sensitive/PFC loads) vs modified/stepped sine (cheap, basic loads).
- Specs: VA/W rating (power factor!), runtime, efficiency, THD, transfer time; contrast with a standby generator (long outages, slow start) — often paired.
UGC NET focus
Online (double-conversion, zero transfer, best quality) vs offline (standby, finite transfer, cheap) vs line-interactive (AVR); rectifier→battery→inverter chain; backup-time computation; pure vs modified sine; static-switch role.
§ 9.11Open-Loop & Closed-Loop Control Systems
Open-loop vs closed-loop
| Open-loop | Closed-loop (feedback) |
| Feedback | none — output not measured | output sensed & compared to reference |
| Accuracy | depends on calibration; drifts | self-correcting (error-driven) |
| Disturbance rejection | poor | good |
| Stability | inherently stable (if components are) | can become unstable (the price of feedback) |
| Cost / complexity | low | higher (sensors, controller) |
| Example | washing-machine timer, toaster, traffic-light timer | thermostat, cruise control, servo, voltage regulator |
Closed-loop (negative-feedback) transfer function
$$ \frac{C(s)}{R(s)} = \frac{G(s)}{1 + G(s)H(s)} \qquad (\text{unity feedback: } H = 1) $$
- Loop gain GH; characteristic equation 1 + GH = 0 (its roots = closed-loop poles → stability, §9.14–9.15).
- Sensitivity: feedback reduces sensitivity to plant variation by 1/(1+GH); also reshapes bandwidth, disturbance and noise response (the §4.9/§3.x feedback story applied to systems).
- Time-domain specs (second-order, Unit-3 §3.10): rise time, peak overshoot \( M_p = e^{-\pi\zeta/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}} \), settling \( t_s = 4/\zeta\omega_n \), damping ζ, natural frequency ω_n.
- Steady-state error & system type (number of s in the denominator = number of integrators):
Static error constants
$$ K_p = \lim_{s\to0}GH,\ \ K_v = \lim_{s\to0}sGH,\ \ K_a = \lim_{s\to0}s^2GH; \quad e_{ss}(\text{step}) = \frac{1}{1+K_p},\ e_{ss}(\text{ramp}) = \frac{1}{K_v} $$
Type-0 → finite step error; Type-1 → zero step error, finite ramp error; Type-2 → tracks ramps with zero error. Adding an integrator (PI, §9.16) raises the type → kills steady-state error.
UGC NET focus
C/R = G/(1+GH); 1 + GH = 0 = characteristic equation; system-type ↔ steady-state-error table (Type-1 zero step error); e_ss = 1/(1+K_p) and 1/K_v; open vs closed property matching; feedback trades stability for accuracy.
§ 9.12Block-Diagram Reduction
Reduction rules
| Configuration | Equivalent |
| Cascade (series) | G₁·G₂ |
| Parallel (summing) | G₁ ± G₂ |
| Negative feedback loop | G/(1 + GH) |
| Positive feedback loop | G/(1 − GH) |
| Move summing point past a block | insert 1/G on the moved input |
| Move take-off point past a block | insert G on the moved branch |
| Move take-off before a block | insert 1/G |
- Strategy: combine innermost cascades/parallels first, collapse inner feedback loops, then relocate summing/take-off points to untangle interlocking loops, repeat until a single block C/R remains.
- The relocation rules keep the signal mathematically unchanged — the inserted 1/G or G compensates the moved block.
- For multi-input systems (reference + disturbance), use superposition: find C/R with disturbance = 0 and C/D with reference = 0, then add.
UGC NET focus
Series/parallel/feedback collapses; the 1/G–G compensation when moving summing vs take-off points; superposition for reference + disturbance; reduce a given diagram to C/R (a guaranteed full-solve question).
§ 9.13Transfer Function & Signal-Flow Graphs
- Transfer function T(s) = C(s)/R(s) at zero initial conditions = ℒ{output}/ℒ{input}; poles = roots of the characteristic polynomial (denominator), zeros = numerator roots (Unit-3 §3.11). Defined only for LTI systems; impulse response = ℒ⁻¹{T(s)}.
- Signal-flow graph (SFG): nodes = variables, directed branches = gains; an algebraic, no-relocation alternative to block diagrams. Vocabulary: forward path, loop, non-touching loops, path gain, loop gain.
Mason's gain formula — the SFG payoff
$$ T = \frac{\sum_k P_k\Delta_k}{\Delta}, \quad \Delta = 1 - \sum L_i + \sum L_iL_j - \sum L_iL_jL_k + \cdots $$
- Δ (graph determinant) = 1 − (sum of all loop gains) + (sum of products of two non-touching loops) − (products of three non-touching loops) + …
- P_k = gain of the k-th forward path; Δ_k = Δ evaluated with all loops touching P_k removed.
- One formula gives C/R directly — no successive reduction; the reason SFGs are exam favourites for complex multi-loop systems.
UGC NET focus
Apply Mason's formula to a given SFG (compute Δ, identify non-touching loops, forward paths and their Δ_k); convert a block diagram ↔ SFG; T from a single-loop graph = P/(1−L).
§ 9.14Routh–Hurwitz Stability Criterion
Stability definition
A linear system is (BIBO/absolutely) stable ⟺ all roots of the characteristic equation 1 + GH = 0 lie in the left half of the s-plane. Routh–Hurwitz tests this without solving for the roots.
Procedure
- Necessary condition: all coefficients of the characteristic polynomial \( a_ns^n + \cdots + a_0 \) present and of the same sign (a missing or sign-changed coefficient ⇒ unstable immediately).
- Build the Routh array (sⁿ, sⁿ⁻¹ rows from coefficients; lower rows from 2×2 determinants).
- Stability ⟺ no sign change in the first column; the number of first-column sign changes = number of RHP roots.
- Special cases:
- Zero in the first column (rest of row nonzero): replace with ε → 0⁺ and continue.
- Entire row of zeros: symmetric roots (on jω axis / RHP–LHP pairs) — form the auxiliary equation from the row above, differentiate, and use its coefficients; the auxiliary roots reveal jω-axis (marginal) crossings.
- Marginal stability: a row of zeros with auxiliary roots purely on the jω axis → sustained oscillation at \( \omega = \sqrt{\text{auxiliary root}} \).
- Design use: find the range of a gain K for stability (the classic numerical) — express the first-column entries in K and require all > 0; the boundary value gives the critical gain and oscillation frequency.
UGC NET focus
Construct the array and read first-column sign changes = RHP roots; find the K-range for stability and the critical K / oscillation frequency from the auxiliary equation; necessary-coefficient condition; ε-method and row-of-zeros handling.
§ 9.15Nyquist Plot & Stability
A frequency-domain stability test using the open-loop G(jω)H(jω) to judge the closed-loop — and, unlike Routh, it handles transport delay and reads off relative stability (margins).
Nyquist criterion (encirclement)
$$ N = Z - P \quad\Longrightarrow\quad \textbf{stable } (Z = 0) \text{ iff } N = -P $$
UGC NET focus
N = Z − P and "no encirclement of −1 when P = 0"; gain/phase-margin definitions and reading them off the plot/Bode; −1 point significance; margins as relative stability; counting RHP open-loop poles P.
§ 9.16On-Off, P, PI, PD & PID Controllers
PID control law
$$ u(t) = K_p e(t) + K_i\!\int e\,dt + K_d\frac{de}{dt} \;\Longleftrightarrow\; G_c(s) = K_p\left(1 + \frac{1}{T_is} + T_ds\right) = K_p + \frac{K_i}{s} + K_d s $$
Controller modes — effect of each term
| Mode | Action | Effect on performance |
| On-Off (bang-bang) | output full ON/OFF about a setpoint (with hysteresis/deadband) | simplest; continuous oscillation about setpoint (thermostat); no precise hold |
| P | u ∝ error | faster, lower rise time; leaves steady-state offset; large K_p → instability |
| I | u ∝ ∫error | eliminates steady-state error (adds a pole at origin → raises system type); slows response, can add overshoot/instability; integral windup |
| D | u ∝ d(error)/dt | anticipatory → improves damping/stability, reduces overshoot & settling; amplifies noise; never used alone |
| PI | P + I | zero steady-state error, good for slow processes; sacrifices some speed/stability |
| PD | P + D | improves transient/stability & speed; keeps an offset (no I) |
| PID | all three | zero offset + good transient — the universal industrial controller |
- Term summary (memory hook): P = present error, I = accumulated past error, D = predicted future error.
- Tuning — Ziegler–Nichols (the named method): increase K_p until sustained oscillation → record ultimate gain K_u and period T_u → set \( K_p = 0.6K_u,\ T_i = T_u/2,\ T_d = T_u/8 \) (classic PID); or the open-loop reaction-curve (process-reaction) method. Cohen–Coon, IMC as alternatives; modern auto-tuners.
- Practical refinements: derivative on measurement (not error) to avoid setpoint kick; filtered D; integral anti-windup clamping; setpoint weighting.
- Realization: op-amp analog PID (integrator + differentiator + summer, Unit-4 §4.12) or digital (difference-equation PID in a microcontroller, Unit-6 — sampled e[n], velocity form).
UGC NET focus
Match term ↔ effect: I removes steady-state error (raises type), D improves stability/damping but amplifies noise, P leaves offset; PID law and G_c(s); Ziegler–Nichols K_u/T_u settings; on-off = hysteresis oscillation; P-I-D = present-past-future hook.
§ 9.17Unit-9 Formula Sheet
One-stop reference table — Unit 9
| Topic | Result | Notes |
| SCR latch | α₁ + α₂ → 1 | gate loses control after firing |
| SCR currents | I_L > I_H (latching > holding) | off by commutation only |
| TRIAC phase control | V_o(rms) = V_rms√[(1/π)((π−α) + sin2α/2)] | full-wave resistive load |
| dv/dt false turn-on | i = C_{J2}·dv/dt → RC snubber | C tames dv/dt |
| di/dt limit | di/dt = V/L → series inductor | L tames di/dt |
| Over-current | fuse I²t < SCR I²t | crowbar for over-voltage |
| UJT trigger | f = 1/[RC ln(1/(1−η))]; V_P = ηV_BB + V_D | relaxation oscillator |
| DC motor speed | N = (V − I_aR_a)/kφ | V, φ, R_a knobs |
| Chopper | V_o = D·V_in | armature-voltage control |
| Sync speed / slip | N_s = 120f/P; s = (N_s−N)/N_s | V/f (VFD) control |
| Buck | V_o = D·V_in | step-down |
| Boost | V_o = V_in/(1−D) | step-up |
| Buck–boost | V_o = −D·V_in/(1−D) | inverting |
| UPS backup | t = (battery Wh × η)/load W | online = zero transfer |
| Closed loop | C/R = G/(1 + GH) | char. eqn 1 + GH = 0 |
| Steady-state error | e_ss(step) = 1/(1+K_p); e_ss(ramp) = 1/K_v | Type-1 → zero step error |
| Error constants | K_p = limGH; K_v = lim sGH; K_a = lim s²GH | s→0 |
| Block reduction | series G₁G₂; feedback G/(1±GH) | move point → ×G or ×1/G |
| Mason | T = ΣP_kΔ_k/Δ | Δ = 1 − ΣL + ΣL_iL_j − … |
| Routh–Hurwitz | stable ⟺ no first-column sign change | #changes = #RHP roots |
| Nyquist | N = Z − P; stable iff N = −P | P=0: don't encircle −1 |
| Margins | GM at ∠=−180°; PM = 180° + ∠GH at |GH|=1 | both > 0 ⇒ stable |
| PID | u = K_p e + K_i∫e + K_d de/dt | I removes offset, D adds damping |
| Ziegler–Nichols | K_p = 0.6K_u, T_i = T_u/2, T_d = T_u/8 | ultimate-gain method |
| 2nd-order specs | M_p = e^{−πζ/√(1−ζ²)}; t_s = 4/ζω_n | ω_d = ω_n√(1−ζ²) |
§ 9.18Quick Revision Notes — Unit 9 in 25 Points
Rapid-fire recap (last-day revision)
- SCR = 4-layer PNPN latching switch; two-transistor model latches when α₁ + α₂ → 1; gate loses control after firing; on-drop ~1.5 V.
- I_L (latching, to stay on at firing) > I_H (holding, to remain on); turn-off only by commutation — natural (AC) or forced (DC, capacitor/LC).
- DIAC = two-terminal bidirectional gateless trigger (breaks over both ways) → fires the TRIAC gate.
- TRIAC = two anti-parallel SCRs, one gate, controls both AC half-cycles; quadrants I/III most sensitive; DIAC+RC phase control = dimmers/fan speed.
- Power MOSFET: voltage-driven, fastest, positive TC (easy paralleling), no second breakdown. BJT: second-breakdown SOA limit. IGBT: MOS input + BJT output → high-V/high-I inverters.
- dv/dt → capacitive current i = C·dv/dt → false turn-on → cure with RC snubber (C). di/dt → local hot spot → cure with series L. Memory: C for dv/dt, L for di/dt.
- Over-voltage: snubber + MOV + crowbar (SCR shorts into fuse). Over-current: fast semiconductor fuse with I²t < SCR I²t, series reactor limits di/dt.
- Gate pulse must persist until I_A > I_L; UJT relaxation oscillator (η standoff ratio) is the classic trigger.
- Pulse train beats single pulse: lower gate dissipation, smaller pulse transformer, reliable latching on inductive loads (re-fires until current builds).
- DC motor N = (V − I_aR_a)/kφ; armature-V control below base (constant torque, chopper V_o = DV_in), field weakening above base (constant power), R_a control wasteful.
- AC: N_s = 120f/P, slip s = (N_s−N)/N_s; V/f (VFD: rectifier→DC link→PWM inverter) is the modern induction-motor method; synchronous motor runs at N_s, corrects PF.
- SMPS: switch fully ON/OFF at high f → 70–95% efficient, small/light, but EMI; buck DV_in, boost V_in/(1−D), buck-boost −DV_in/(1−D); flyback = isolated low-power; PWM duty regulates.
- SMPS vs linear: efficient/small/step-up-capable/noisy vs simple/clean/heavy/step-down-only.
- UPS: online (double-conversion, zero transfer, best quality, costly) > line-interactive (AVR) > offline/standby (cheap, finite transfer); backup = battery Wh·η/load.
- Open-loop: no feedback, simple, drifts (toaster/timer). Closed-loop: self-correcting, can go unstable; C/R = G/(1+GH); 1 + GH = 0 = characteristic equation.
- System type = # integrators; e_ss(step) = 1/(1+K_p), e_ss(ramp) = 1/K_v; Type-1 → zero step error; adding I raises type → kills offset.
- Block reduction: series multiply, parallel add, feedback G/(1±GH); move summing point → insert 1/G, move take-off → insert G; superpose reference + disturbance.
- Mason: T = ΣP_kΔ_k/Δ, Δ = 1 − ΣL_i + Σ(non-touching pairs) − …; one-shot solution for multi-loop SFGs.
- Routh–Hurwitz: stable ⟺ all characteristic-eqn coefficients same sign AND no first-column sign change; #sign changes = #RHP roots; row of zeros → auxiliary equation (marginal/jω roots).
- Use Routh to find the K-range for stability and the critical gain/oscillation frequency.
- Nyquist: N = Z − P; stable iff Z = 0; with P = 0, plot must not encircle −1+j0.
- Gain margin at ∠GH = −180°, phase margin = 180° + ∠GH at |GH| = 1; both positive ⇒ stable; closer to −1 ⇒ more oscillatory.
- PID: u = K_p e + K_i∫e + K_d de/dt; P = present (offset remains), I = past (removes offset, adds lag/windup), D = future (damping, noise-amplifying).
- On-off = hysteresis oscillation (thermostat); PI = zero offset slow loops; PD = better transient with offset; PID = best of both (industrial standard).
- Ziegler–Nichols ultimate-gain tuning: K_p = 0.6K_u, T_i = T_u/2, T_d = T_u/8; realize PID with op-amps or a microcontroller.
↑ Back to top of Unit 9