UGC NET · Electronic Science · Code 88 · Unit-Wise Notes

Unit 3 — Network Analysis, Transforms & Signal Processing: Complete Exam Notes

Network elements & graphs · nodal/mesh analysis · superposition, Thevenin, Norton & maximum power transfer · AC analysis & resonance · transients · Laplace, Fourier & Z-transforms · transfer functions, poles & zeros · Bode plots · passive filters · Z, Y, ABCD, h parameters · state variables · sampling theorem · DFT & FFT · IIR/FIR digital filters.

SYLLABUS: NTA UGC NET (88) LEVEL: Asst. Professor / JRF FORMAT: Theory + Formulas + Revision

§ 3.1Network Elements

Classification axes (each pair is exam material):

  • Linear / nonlinear: linear elements obey superposition and homogeneity (R, L, C with constant values); diode/transistor are nonlinear.
  • Active / passive: passive elements cannot deliver net energy \( \big(\int_{-\infty}^{t} v\,i\,dt \ge 0\big) \) — R dissipates, L and C only store; active elements (sources, transistors) can supply energy.
  • Bilateral / unilateral: bilateral elements behave identically for either current direction (R, L, C); diode is unilateral.
  • Lumped / distributed: lumped if physical size ≪ λ; otherwise distributed (transmission lines, Unit-VII).
  • Time-invariant / time-varying.
The three passive elements — v–i relations, energy, switching behaviour
Resistor RInductor LCapacitor C
v–i law\( v = Ri \)\( v = L\,di/dt \)\( i = C\,dv/dt \)
Energydissipates \(i^2R\)\( W = \tfrac12 Li^2 \)\( W = \tfrac12 Cv^2 \)
Cannot change abruptlycurrent \(i_L\)voltage \(v_C\)
DC steady stateshort circuitopen circuit
At t = 0⁺ (de-energized)open circuitshort circuit
Series / paralleladd / reciprocaladd / reciprocalreciprocal / add

Sources

  • Independent: ideal voltage source (R_int = 0; never short it) and ideal current source (R_int = ∞; never open it).
  • Dependent (controlled): VCVS (gain µ), VCCS (g_m), CCVS (r_m), CCCS (β) — essential for transistor models; they are not deactivated in superposition/Thevenin source-killing.
  • Source transformation: \( V_s \) in series with R ⇌ \( I_s = V_s/R \) in parallel with R.
UGC NET focus "Which quantity cannot change instantaneously?" (i_L, v_C); inductor as SC / capacitor as OC in DC steady state and the t = 0⁺ duals; identifying the four dependent-source types from transistor models; passivity definition via energy integral.

§ 3.2Network Graphs & Topology

Replace every element by a line (branch) between nodes → the graph captures interconnection only. For a connected graph with n nodes and b branches:

Fundamental counts (memorize) $$ \text{Tree branches (twigs)} = n - 1, \qquad \text{Links (chords)} = b - n + 1 $$
  • Tree: connected subgraph containing all n nodes with no loop; the remaining branches are the co-tree (links). Number of possible trees = det(A·Aᵀ) where A is the reduced incidence matrix.
  • Fundamental loops (tie-sets): each link + the unique tree path closing it → b − n + 1 independent KVL equations (= number of independent mesh/loop currents).
  • Fundamental cut-sets: each twig + the links it separates → n − 1 independent KCL equations (= number of independent node voltages).
  • Incidence matrix A (n−1 × b): a_ij = +1 (branch j leaves node i), −1 (enters), 0 (not incident). KCL: \( A\,i_b = 0 \). Tie-set matrix B: KVL \( B\,v_b = 0 \); branch currents from loop currents \( i_b = B^{T}i_{loop} \). Cut-set matrix Q: \( Q\,i_b = 0 \), \( v_b = Q^{T}v_{tree} \). Orthogonality: \( B A^{T} = 0 \).
  • Planar graph: drawable without branch crossings — mesh analysis applies only to planar networks.
  • Duality: R↔G, L↔C, V↔I, series↔parallel, mesh↔node, SC↔OC — dual networks have interchanged equations.
UGC NET focus Counting questions (given n, b → twigs, links, KCL/KVL equation counts); tree contains no loop; properties of A (column sums zero for full matrix); duality pair matching.

§ 3.3Nodal & Mesh Analysis

Nodal analysis (KCL-based)

  • Choose a reference (ground); assign n − 1 node voltages; write KCL at each in conductance form: \( \mathbf{G}\,\mathbf{V} = \mathbf{I} \). For purely independent current sources, G is symmetric: G_kk = Σ conductances at node k; G_kj = −(conductance between k and j).
  • Supernode: a voltage source (with no series R) between two non-reference nodes — enclose both nodes, write one KCL for the pair plus the constraint \( V_a - V_b = V_{source} \).
  • Preferred when nodes ≪ meshes, with current sources, and for non-planar circuits; this is the method inside SPICE (modified nodal analysis).

Mesh analysis (KVL-based, planar only)

  • Assign clockwise mesh currents to the b − n + 1 meshes; \( \mathbf{R}\,\mathbf{I} = \mathbf{V} \): R_kk = Σ resistances around mesh k; R_kj = −(shared resistance).
  • Supermesh: a current source shared by two meshes — write KVL around the combined periphery plus the constraint \( I_a - I_b = I_{source} \).
UGC NET focus Set up (not necessarily solve) the matrix by inspection — diagonal = self, off-diagonal = negative mutual; recognize when a supernode/supermesh is required; equation-count questions tie back to §3.2.

§ 3.4Network Theorems

Superposition

In a linear network with several independent sources, any response = algebraic sum of responses to each source acting alone, others deactivated (voltage source → short, current source → open; dependent sources stay active). Not applicable to power (P ∝ x², nonlinear in sources).

Thevenin's theorem

Any linear two-terminal network ≡ \( V_{Th} \) in series with \( Z_{Th} \): \(V_{Th}\) = open-circuit voltage; \( Z_{Th} \) = impedance looking in with independent sources killed. With dependent sources: \( Z_{Th} = V_{Th}/I_{SC} \) or apply a test source. Fails for nonlinear/unilateral elements and (for the impedance step) networks with controlled sources only handled by the test-source method.

Norton's theorem

Dual form: \( I_N = I_{SC} \) in parallel with \( Z_N = Z_{Th} \); conversion \( V_{Th} = I_N Z_{Th} \).

Maximum Power Transfer (MPT)

MPT conditions & maximum power (RMS quantities) $$ \text{DC / resistive: } R_L = R_{Th} \Rightarrow P_{max} = \frac{V_{Th}^{2}}{4R_{Th}} \qquad \text{AC: } Z_L = Z_{Th}^{*} \Rightarrow P_{max} = \frac{|V_{Th}|^{2}}{4R_{Th}} $$
  • Efficiency at MPT = 50% (half dissipates in R_Th) — acceptable in communication (signal level matters), not in power systems.
  • Restricted cases: if only |Z_L| adjustable (fixed angle): \( |Z_L| = |Z_{Th}| \); if R_L only (X_L fixed): \( R_L = \sqrt{R_{Th}^2 + (X_{Th}+X_L)^2} \).

Other theorems (one-liners that appear as MCQs)

  • Reciprocity: in a single-source linear bilateral network, interchanging an ideal source and the response point leaves the response unchanged (Z_12 = Z_21 networks; no dependent sources).
  • Millman: parallel voltage-source branches combine to \( V = \dfrac{\sum V_iG_i}{\sum G_i} \).
  • Substitution: any branch may be replaced by a source equal to its existing v or i without disturbing the network.
  • Tellegen: \( \sum_b v_b i_b = 0 \) — conservation of power, requires only KCL+KVL (any elements, even different networks with the same graph).
  • Compensation: ΔZ in a branch carrying I ≡ adding source V = I·ΔZ opposing the current.
UGC NET focus MPT numericals (find R_L and P_max — watch RMS vs peak: peak form gives V_m²/8R_Th); 50% efficiency statement; superposition not valid for power; Thevenin with dependent sources via I_SC; Tellegen needs no element information.

§ 3.5AC Circuit Analysis & Resonance

Phasors and impedance

For sinusoidal steady state at ω, replace \( v(t) = V_m\cos(\omega t + \phi) \) by phasor \( V = V_m\angle\phi \); differentiation → ×jω. Impedances: \( Z_R = R,\ Z_L = j\omega L,\ Z_C = 1/j\omega C = -j/\omega C \). Current lags by 90° in L, leads by 90° in C (CIVIL mnemonic).

AC power (RMS phasors) $$ S = VI^{*} = P + jQ, \quad P = V_{rms}I_{rms}\cos\theta\ (\text{W}), \quad Q = V_{rms}I_{rms}\sin\theta\ (\text{VAR}), \quad |S| = V_{rms}I_{rms}\ (\text{VA}) $$

Power factor cosθ (lagging = inductive); PF correction adds parallel C supplying Q. \( V_{rms} = V_m/\sqrt2 \) for sinusoids; form factor 1.11, peak factor 1.414.

Series RLC resonance

Series resonance $$ \omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}, \qquad Q = \frac{\omega_0 L}{R} = \frac{1}{\omega_0CR} = \frac{1}{R}\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}, \qquad BW = \frac{\omega_0}{Q} = \frac{R}{L}, \qquad f_{1,2} \approx f_0 \mp \frac{BW}{2} $$
  • At ω₀: Z = R (minimum), current maximum, circuit purely resistive, unity PF; voltage magnification: \( V_L = V_C = QV_s \) (can exceed supply — "acceptor circuit").
  • Below ω₀ capacitive, above inductive; half-power frequencies where |Z| = √2·R; ω₀ = √(ω₁ω₂) (geometric mean).

Parallel RLC (anti)resonance

Parallel resonance $$ \omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\ (\text{ideal}), \qquad Z_{max} = R_{dyn} = \frac{L}{RC}\ (\text{coil-}R\ \text{tank}), \qquad \omega_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\sqrt{1 - \frac{R^{2}C}{L}} $$

Impedance maximum, line current minimum ("rejector circuit"), current magnification Q inside the tank. Q_parallel = R/(ω₀L) for ideal parallel R.

UGC NET focus Q and bandwidth numericals; V_C = QV at series resonance; dynamic resistance L/CR; series = minimum Z / parallel = maximum Z contrast; power-factor/complex-power computations; geometric-mean relation of half-power frequencies.

§ 3.6Transient Analysis

First-order circuits (RL, RC)

Universal single-time-constant solution $$ x(t) = x(\infty) + \big[x(0^{+}) - x(\infty)\big]e^{-t/\tau}, \qquad \tau_{RC} = RC, \quad \tau_{RL} = \frac{L}{R} $$
  • R seen by the storage element (Thevenin R) sets τ. One τ → 63.2% of the change; 5τ ≈ complete; initial slope reaches the final value in exactly τ.
  • Continuity: \( v_C(0^+) = v_C(0^-) \), \( i_L(0^+) = i_L(0^-) \); everything else may jump.
  • Charging capacitor: \( v_C = V(1 - e^{-t/\tau}) \), \( i = \tfrac{V}{R}e^{-t/\tau} \); energy delivered by source = CV², stored = ½CV² → 50% charging efficiency regardless of R.

Second-order circuits (series RLC)

Characteristic equation \( s^2 + 2\alpha s + \omega_0^2 = 0 \), with damping factor \( \alpha = R/2L \) (series) or \( 1/2RC \) (parallel) and \( \omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC} \). Damping ratio \( \zeta = \alpha/\omega_0 \):

Damping cases
ConditionζRootsResponse
\( R > 2\sqrt{L/C} \)>1real, distinctoverdamped (two exponentials)
\( R = 2\sqrt{L/C} \)=1real, repeatedcritically damped (fastest non-oscillatory)
\( R < 2\sqrt{L/C} \)<1complex \( -\alpha \pm j\omega_d \)underdamped, rings at \( \omega_d = \omega_0\sqrt{1-\zeta^2} \)
R = 00±jω₀undamped oscillation

Complete response = natural (transient, source-free) + forced (steady-state, source form). Q-link: \( \zeta = 1/2Q \).

UGC NET focus Evaluate x(0⁺), x(∞), τ by inspection and write the answer directly from the universal formula; critical resistance \(2\sqrt{L/C}\); 63.2%/5τ facts; the 50% capacitor-charging energy result; ω_d vs ω₀ distinction.

§ 3.7Laplace Transform

Definition (unilateral) $$ F(s) = \int_{0^{-}}^{\infty} f(t)\,e^{-st}\,dt, \qquad s = \sigma + j\omega $$

Converts linear constant-coefficient ODEs into algebra and automatically includes initial conditions — the natural tool for transient circuit analysis.

Essential transform pairs
f(t), t ≥ 0F(s)f(t)F(s)
δ(t)1e^{−at}1/(s+a)
u(t)1/st e^{−at}1/(s+a)²
t1/s²sin ωtω/(s²+ω²)
tⁿn!/s^{n+1}cos ωts/(s²+ω²)
e^{−at}sin ωtω/[(s+a)²+ω²]e^{−at}cos ωt(s+a)/[(s+a)²+ω²]
Key properties
PropertyStatement
Linearityaf₁ + bf₂ → aF₁ + bF₂
Time shiftf(t−a)u(t−a) → e^{−as}F(s)
Frequency shifte^{−at}f(t) → F(s+a)
Scalingf(at) → (1/a)F(s/a)
Differentiationf′(t) → sF(s) − f(0⁻); f″ → s²F − sf(0⁻) − f′(0⁻)
Integration∫₀ᵗf dτ → F(s)/s
t-multiplicationt f(t) → −dF/ds
Convolutionf₁ * f₂ → F₁(s)·F₂(s)
Initial & final value theorems $$ f(0^{+}) = \lim_{s\to\infty} sF(s), \qquad f(\infty) = \lim_{s\to 0} sF(s)\ \ (\text{valid only if all poles of } sF(s) \text{ in LHP}) $$

s-domain circuit models

  • R → R; L → sL in series with source \( Li(0^-) \) (or parallel current source i(0⁻)/s); C → 1/sC in series with \( v(0^-)/s \) (or parallel Cv(0⁻)).
  • Solve by nodal/mesh in s, then invert by partial fractions; repeated and complex poles handled by standard expansions.
UGC NET focus Final-value-theorem validity check (e.g., fails for sin ωt — poles on jω axis); pair lookups; the L and C initial-condition equivalent sources; convolution↔multiplication duality.

§ 3.8Fourier Series & Fourier Transform

Fourier series (periodic signals, period T, ω₀ = 2π/T)

Trigonometric & exponential forms $$ f(t) = a_0 + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(a_n\cos n\omega_0 t + b_n\sin n\omega_0 t) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} c_n e^{jn\omega_0 t}, \qquad c_n = \frac{1}{T}\int_T f(t)e^{-jn\omega_0 t}dt $$
  • Dirichlet conditions guarantee convergence; at discontinuities the series converges to the midpoint; truncation causes ~9% Gibbs overshoot.
  • Symmetry shortcuts: even → only a_n (cosines); odd → only b_n; half-wave symmetry f(t±T/2) = −f(t) → only odd harmonics. Square wave: \( \frac{4A}{\pi}\big(\sin\omega_0t + \tfrac13\sin3\omega_0t + \cdots\big) \).
  • Parseval: average power \( = \sum |c_n|^2 = a_0^2 + \tfrac12\sum(a_n^2+b_n^2) \).

Fourier transform (aperiodic, energy signals)

Definition & inverse $$ X(\omega) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}x(t)e^{-j\omega t}dt, \qquad x(t) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}X(\omega)e^{j\omega t}d\omega $$
Pairs & properties to memorize
x(t)X(ω)PropertyStatement
δ(t)1DualityX(t) ↔ 2πx(−ω)
12πδ(ω)Time shiftx(t−t₀) ↔ e^{−jωt₀}X(ω)
e^{−at}u(t)1/(a+jω)Modulationx(t)e^{jω₀t} ↔ X(ω−ω₀)
rect(t/τ)τ·sinc(ωτ/2)Scalingx(at) ↔ (1/|a|)X(ω/a)
e^{−a|t|}2a/(a²+ω²)Convolutionx*h ↔ XH; xh ↔ (1/2π)X*H
cos ω₀tπ[δ(ω−ω₀)+δ(ω+ω₀)]Differentiationx′ ↔ jωX
Gaussian e^{−t²/2σ²}Gaussian (self-FT shape)Parseval∫|x|²dt = (1/2π)∫|X|²dω
  • Rect ↔ sinc pair embodies the time–bandwidth inverse relationship; narrow pulse → wide spectrum.
  • Real x(t) → conjugate-symmetric X(−ω) = X*(ω): |X| even, phase odd.
  • FT = Laplace on the jω axis (when ROC includes it); FS = sampled FT of one period: \( c_n = \tfrac1T X_{1\,period}(n\omega_0) \).
UGC NET focus Symmetry → which coefficients vanish; square-wave harmonic amplitudes (1/n, odd only); Gibbs 9%; rect↔sinc and first-null bandwidth 2π/τ; Parseval power computations.

§ 3.9Z-Transform

Definition (bilateral) $$ X(z) = \sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty} x[n]\,z^{-n} $$

The discrete-time counterpart of Laplace. The ROC (region of convergence) is part of the answer — the same X(z) with different ROCs corresponds to different sequences.

Pairs with ROC
x[n]X(z)ROC
δ[n]1all z
u[n]z/(z−1)|z| > 1
aⁿu[n]z/(z−a)|z| > |a| (right-sided)
−aⁿu[−n−1]z/(z−a)|z| < |a| (left-sided)
n aⁿu[n]az/(z−a)²|z| > |a|
aⁿcos(ω₀n)u[n](z²−az cosω₀)/(z²−2az cosω₀+a²)|z| > |a|
  • ROC rules: right-sided → outside outermost pole; left-sided → inside innermost; two-sided → annulus; finite-length → all z (except possibly 0/∞). ROC never contains poles.
  • Properties: time shift \( x[n-k] \leftrightarrow z^{-k}X(z) \) (the "delay = z⁻¹" identity behind filter structures); scaling aⁿx[n] ↔ X(z/a); convolution ↔ product; time reversal x[−n] ↔ X(1/z); differentiation n·x[n] ↔ −z dX/dz.
  • Initial value: x[0] = lim_{z→∞} X(z) (causal); final value: lim_{z→1}(z−1)X(z) if poles of (z−1)X(z) inside unit circle.
  • Stability/causality: causal LTI stable ⟺ all poles strictly inside the unit circle ⟺ ROC includes |z| = 1. DTFT exists when ROC contains the unit circle: \( X(e^{j\Omega}) = X(z)|_{z=e^{j\Omega}} \).
  • s↔z mapping: \( z = e^{sT} \) — LHP → inside unit circle, jω-axis → unit circle.
  • Inversion: partial fractions (in z⁻¹ or X(z)/z form), power-series, residues.
UGC NET focus Same X(z), different ROC → different x[n]; stability = poles inside unit circle; z = e^{sT} mapping facts; delay property; final-value validity.

§ 3.10Time & Frequency Domain Response

  • Impulse response h(t) fully characterizes an LTI system: \( y = x * h \); step response s(t) = ∫h; frequency response \( H(j\omega) = |H|e^{j\angle H} \) — output sinusoid is scaled by |H(jω₀)| and shifted by ∠H(jω₀).
  • First-order \( H(s) = \tfrac{1}{1+s\tau} \): step response \(1-e^{-t/\tau}\); 10–90% rise time \( t_r = 2.2\tau \); −3 dB bandwidth \( \omega_c = 1/\tau \) →
    Rise-time–bandwidth product $$ t_r \times BW(\text{Hz}) \approx 0.35 $$
  • Second-order \( H(s) = \dfrac{\omega_n^{2}}{s^{2} + 2\zeta\omega_n s + \omega_n^{2}} \): underdamped step response overshoots —
    Second-order step-response metrics $$ M_p = e^{-\pi\zeta/\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}}}, \quad t_p = \frac{\pi}{\omega_d}, \quad t_s \approx \frac{4}{\zeta\omega_n}\ (2\%), \quad \omega_d = \omega_n\sqrt{1-\zeta^{2}} $$
    Frequency domain: resonant peak \( M_r = 1/(2\zeta\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}) \) at \( \omega_r = \omega_n\sqrt{1-2\zeta^2} \) (exists for ζ < 0.707).
  • Distortionless transmission: |H| constant and phase linear in ω (constant group delay \( \tau_g = -d\phi/d\omega \)); deviation → amplitude/phase (delay) distortion.
  • Trade-off intuition: wider bandwidth ↔ faster response; higher Q/lower ζ ↔ peaking and ringing.
UGC NET focus 0.35/BW rise time; overshoot from ζ (ζ = 0.707 → ~4.3%, no resonance peak boundary); settling 4/ζωₙ; linear phase ⇒ pure delay; output of LTI to sinusoid stays a sinusoid at the same frequency.

§ 3.11Transfer Functions, Poles & Zeros

Transfer function (zero initial conditions) $$ H(s) = \frac{Y(s)}{X(s)} = K\,\frac{(s - z_1)(s - z_2)\cdots(s - z_m)}{(s - p_1)(s - p_2)\cdots(s - p_n)}, \qquad n \ge m \ \text{(proper)} $$
  • Poles (denominator roots) = natural frequencies — they fix the form of the transient: real LHP pole → decaying exponential; complex pair −α±jω_d → damped sinusoid; jω-axis pair → sustained oscillation; RHP → growth (instability).
  • Zeros shape the magnitude/phase but not stability; a zero at the excitation frequency blocks transmission (notch).
  • Stability: BIBO-stable ⟺ all poles strictly in the LHP ⟺ ∫|h(t)|dt < ∞. Marginal: simple jω poles. (Routh–Hurwitz testing: Unit-IX.)
  • Minimum-phase systems: all zeros also in LHP — magnitude determines phase uniquely; RHP zeros add excess phase (non-minimum-phase: initial undershoot).
  • For RLC driving-point immittances: poles and zeros are simple, lie in the closed LHP, and (for LC networks) alternate on the jω axis — Foster/Cauer realizability facts.
  • h(t) = ℒ⁻¹{H(s)}; DC gain = H(0); high-frequency behaviour from n − m excess poles (−20(n−m) dB/dec eventual slope).
UGC NET focus Match pole locations ↔ response sketches; stability classification from a given H(s); LC immittance pole–zero alternation; "poles of the transfer function = natural frequencies of the network."

§ 3.12Bode Plots

Asymptotic log–log plots of |H| (dB = 20 log|H|) and phase vs log ω. Decompose H(jω) into standard factors; magnitudes add in dB, phases add directly.

Bode building blocks
FactorMagnitude asymptotePhase
Gain K20 log K (flat)0° (180° if K<0)
s (zero at origin)+20 dB/dec through 0 dB at ω = 1+90° constant
1/s (pole at origin)−20 dB/dec−90° constant
(1 + s/ω_c) zero0 until ω_c, then +20 dB/dec0→+90° (+45° at ω_c), over ω_c/10 … 10ω_c
1/(1 + s/ω_c) pole0 until ω_c, then −20 dB/dec0→−90° (−45° at ω_c)
Quadratic pole pair (ζ, ωₙ)−40 dB/dec past ωₙ; peak \(1/2\zeta\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}\) if ζ<0.7070→−180° (−90° at ωₙ)
  • Corner (break) frequency: asymptotes intersect; true curve deviates −3 dB at ω_c for a simple pole (−1 dB at ω_c/2, exact curve symmetric in log ω).
  • Slope bookkeeping: each pole adds −20 dB/dec, each zero +20 dB/dec; final slope −20(n−m) dB/dec; −20 dB/dec ≡ −6 dB/octave.
  • Reading specs: gain margin = −|H| (dB) at the phase-crossover (∠ = −180°); phase margin = 180° + ∠H at the gain-crossover (|H| = 1). Positive margins → closed-loop stability (control context, Unit-IX).
  • Reverse problems: reconstruct H(s) from a given asymptotic plot — count slope changes (±20: simple, ±40: double or quadratic) and read corner frequencies; identify type (number of origin poles) from the low-frequency slope.
UGC NET focus −3 dB at the corner; slope arithmetic (e.g., two poles + one zero → net −20 dB/dec at HF); −45°/decade phase ramp approximation; reconstructing H(s) from a sketched plot is a recurring full numericals.

§ 3.13Passive Filters

First-order RC/RL prototypes

  • Low-pass RC (output across C): \( H = \frac{1}{1+j\omega RC} \), \( f_c = \frac{1}{2\pi RC} \), −20 dB/dec, phase 0→−90°. Acts as an integrator well above f_c.
  • High-pass RC (output across R): \( H = \frac{j\omega RC}{1+j\omega RC} \), same f_c, +20 dB/dec below; differentiator well below f_c.
  • Band-pass: series RLC output across R — center ω₀ = 1/√(LC), BW = R/L, Q = ω₀L/R. Band-stop (notch): output across the LC pair; twin-T RC notch is the classic RC-only realization.

Image-parameter (classical) filters

  • Constant-k prototype: series Z₁ and shunt Z₂ with \( Z_1Z_2 = k^2 = R_0^2 \) (frequency-independent product).
    Constant-k low-pass (T or π section) $$ f_c = \frac{1}{\pi\sqrt{LC}}, \qquad R_0 = \sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}; \qquad \text{HP: } f_c = \frac{1}{4\pi\sqrt{LC}} $$
    Pass-band when Z₁/4Z₂ lies between −1 and 0. Drawbacks: slow cutoff, image impedance varies over the pass band (mismatch).
  • m-derived sections: modify with parameter m (0 < m < 1) to place a pole of attenuation \( f_\infty \) just beyond cutoff → sharp transition: \( m = \sqrt{1 - (f_c/f_\infty)^2} \) (LP). Attenuation falls again past f_∞, so practice cascades constant-k (high far-out attenuation) + m-derived (sharp edge) + m = 0.6 half-sections for near-constant terminating impedance.
  • Modern polynomial responses (named, frequently asked): Butterworth — maximally flat, \( |H|^2 = 1/(1+(\omega/\omega_c)^{2n}) \); Chebyshev — equiripple pass band, steeper; elliptic — ripple both bands, steepest; Bessel — maximally flat delay (best pulse fidelity). Active versions: Unit-IV.
UGC NET focus f_c formulas: RC 1/2πRC, constant-k LP 1/π√LC (note the missing 2!), HP 1/4π√LC; R₀ = √(L/C); m-derived purpose and m-formula; Butterworth/Chebyshev/Bessel property matching; LP↔integrator, HP↔differentiator regimes.

§ 3.14Two-Port Network Parameters

Port convention: I₁, I₂ both flow into the network; V₁ input, V₂ output.

The four parameter sets
SetEquationsFound withNatural use
Z (open-circuit)V₁ = z₁₁I₁ + z₁₂I₂
V₂ = z₂₁I₁ + z₂₂I₂
open ports (I = 0)series connection (Z's add)
Y (short-circuit)I₁ = y₁₁V₁ + y₁₂V₂
I₂ = y₂₁V₁ + y₂₂V₂
short ports (V = 0)parallel connection (Y's add); Y = Z⁻¹
ABCD (transmission)V₁ = AV₂ − BI₂
I₁ = CV₂ − DI₂
output open/shortcascade: matrices multiply; lines (Unit-VII)
h (hybrid)V₁ = h₁₁I₁ + h₁₂V₂
I₂ = h₂₁I₁ + h₂₂V₂
input short / output open mixtransistor models: h_ie, h_re, h_fe, h_oe
Reciprocity & symmetry tests (memorize the whole row) $$ \textbf{Reciprocal: } z_{12}=z_{21};\ \ y_{12}=y_{21};\ \ AD-BC=1;\ \ h_{12}=-h_{21} $$ $$ \textbf{Symmetric: } z_{11}=z_{22};\ \ y_{11}=y_{22};\ \ A=D;\ \ \Delta h = h_{11}h_{22}-h_{12}h_{21} = 1 $$
  • Networks of R, L, C, M only are reciprocal; dependent sources break reciprocity (transistors: h₂₁ = h_fe ≫ −h₁₂).
  • Standard results worth caching: series impedance Z alone → ABCD = [1, Z; 0, 1]; shunt admittance Y → [1, 0; Y, 1]; ideal transformer n:1 → [n, 0; 0, 1/n].
  • T-network ↔ Z parameters (z₁₁ = Z_a + Z_c etc.); π-network ↔ Y parameters; Δ↔Y (star–delta) conversion as the underlying identity.
  • Interconnections: series → add Z; parallel → add Y; series–parallel → add h; cascade → multiply ABCD (validity requires port-current condition — Brune test).
  • Conversions exist among all sets, e.g. \( z_{11} = \Delta h/h_{22} \), \( y_{21} = -h_{21}/h_{11} \), \( A = z_{11}/z_{21} \), \( B = \Delta z/z_{21} \).
  • Image impedance / characteristic impedance of symmetric sections: \( Z_0 = \sqrt{Z_{OC}Z_{SC}} \) — bridges to filter and line theory.
UGC NET focus Reciprocity/symmetry condition table (AD − BC = 1 is the most-asked single fact); which connection adds which parameters; compute Z or ABCD of simple T/π/L sections; h-parameter ↔ transistor quantity mapping.

§ 3.15State Variable Method

nth-order network → n coupled first-order ODEs. State vector x = the memory of the system; the natural choice in circuits: capacitor voltages and inductor currents (number of states = number of independent storage elements, minus excess C-loops/L-cutsets).

State-space form $$ \dot{\mathbf{x}} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{B}\mathbf{u}, \qquad \mathbf{y} = \mathbf{C}\mathbf{x} + \mathbf{D}\mathbf{u} $$
  • Transfer function from state space: \( H(s) = \mathbf{C}(s\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{A})^{-1}\mathbf{B} + \mathbf{D} \); poles = eigenvalues of A (det(sI − A) = characteristic polynomial).
  • Time solution: \( \mathbf{x}(t) = e^{\mathbf{A}t}\mathbf{x}(0) + \int_0^t e^{\mathbf{A}(t-\tau)}\mathbf{B}\mathbf{u}(\tau)d\tau \); the state-transition matrix \( \Phi(t) = e^{\mathbf{A}t} = \mathcal{L}^{-1}\{(s\mathbf{I}-\mathbf{A})^{-1}\} \) with Φ(0) = I, Φ⁻¹(t) = Φ(−t), Φ(t₁+t₂) = Φ(t₁)Φ(t₂).
  • Advantages over transfer functions: handles MIMO, time-varying and nonlinear extensions, initial conditions naturally, internal (not just I/O) description; basis of controllability/observability (Kalman): controllable if rank[B AB … Aⁿ⁻¹B] = n; observable if rank[C; CA; …; CAⁿ⁻¹]ᵀ = n.
  • Canonical forms (controllable/observable/diagonal) and the companion-matrix construction from a differential equation are standard derivation asks.
UGC NET focus Pick state variables (v_C, i_L); eigenvalues of A = poles; Φ(t) properties; write A, B for a simple RC/RLC circuit; rank tests for controllability/observability.

§ 3.16Signal Representation & Continuous-Time Signals

Standard signals

  • Unit impulse δ(t): ∫δ = 1, sifting \( \int x(t)\delta(t-t_0)dt = x(t_0) \), δ(at) = δ(t)/|a|; unit step u(t) = ∫δ; ramp r(t) = t·u(t); exponential, sinusoid, complex exponential \(e^{j\omega t}\) (eigenfunction of LTI systems); sinc, rect, sgn, Gaussian.

Classification (definitions are direct MCQs)

  • Energy vs power: \( E = \int|x|^2dt \), \( P = \lim_{T\to\infty}\tfrac{1}{2T}\int_{-T}^{T}|x|^2dt \). Energy signal: 0 < E < ∞ (P = 0) — pulses; power signal: 0 < P < ∞ (E = ∞) — periodic/random. A signal can be neither (e.g., e^{t}u(t)), never both.
  • Periodic: x(t+T) = x(t); sum of sinusoids periodic iff frequency ratios rational.
  • Even/odd decomposition: \( x_e = \tfrac12[x(t)+x(-t)] \), \( x_o = \tfrac12[x(t)-x(-t)] \).
  • Deterministic vs random; causal/anticausal.
  • Operations: shift, scale, reversal — order matters: x(at − b) = shift by b then compress by a (or compress then shift by b/a).

System properties (test definitions)

  • Linearity (superposition), time-invariance, causality (h(t) = 0 for t < 0), stability (BIBO: ∫|h| < ∞), memory, invertibility. LTI systems: y = x * h, with convolution properties (commutative, associative; width = sum of widths; convolution with δ(t − t₀) = shift).
UGC NET focus Energy/power classification of given signals; periodicity of sums (rational-ratio test); sifting-property evaluations; convolution length/limits; testing a given y = f(x) for linearity/TI/causality.

§ 3.17Sampling Theorem

Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem A signal band-limited to f_m can be completely reconstructed from its samples if the sampling rate \( f_s \ge 2f_m \). Nyquist rate = 2f_m (minimum f_s); Nyquist interval = 1/2f_m (maximum spacing); f_s/2 is the folding frequency.
  • Ideal (impulse) sampling: \( x_s(t) = x(t)\sum\delta(t-nT_s) \) → spectrum becomes periodic replicas: \( X_s(f) = \tfrac{1}{T_s}\sum_k X(f - kf_s) \).
  • Aliasing: if f_s < 2f_m the replicas overlap; a component at f > f_s/2 masquerades as \( |f - kf_s| \) — e.g., 7 kHz sampled at 10 kHz appears at 3 kHz. Prevention: analog anti-aliasing low-pass pre-filter before the sampler (cannot be fixed after).
  • Reconstruction: ideal LP filter of bandwidth f_s/2 ↔ sinc interpolation \( x(t) = \sum x(nT_s)\,\mathrm{sinc}\!\big(\tfrac{t-nT_s}{T_s}\big) \).
  • Practical sampling: natural (chopper) and flat-top (sample-and-hold) — flat-top multiplies the spectrum by a sinc → aperture effect, equalized by an x/sin x post-filter.
  • Bandpass sampling: signals occupying (f_L, f_H) can be sampled as low as ~2·BW (not 2f_H) under integer-band placement conditions.
  • Applications: PCM/digital audio (speech 8 kHz; CD 44.1 kHz for 20 kHz audio), digital scopes, SDR; oversampling relaxes the anti-alias filter and spreads quantization noise.
UGC NET focus Nyquist-rate computations for composite signals (rate set by the highest frequency; for products of sinc/band-limited signals, bandwidths add for multiplication); locate the alias frequency; why anti-alias filtering precedes sampling; CD 44.1 kHz example.

§ 3.18Discrete-Time Signals & the DFT

DT signal essentials

  • x[n] defined on integers; δ[n] (Kronecker, no scaling subtlety), u[n], aⁿ. DT sinusoid periodicity: cos(Ω₀n) periodic iff Ω₀/2π is rational; period N = smallest integer with Ω₀N = 2πk. DT frequencies are unique only modulo 2π; Ω = π is the highest rate of oscillation.
  • DTFT: \( X(e^{j\Omega}) = \sum x[n]e^{-j\Omega n} \) — continuous and 2π-periodic in Ω. Relation to analog frequency after sampling: Ω = ωT_s = 2πf/f_s.

Discrete Fourier Transform

DFT & IDFT (length N, W_N = e^{−j2π/N}) $$ X[k] = \sum_{n=0}^{N-1} x[n]\,W_N^{kn}, \qquad x[n] = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=0}^{N-1} X[k]\,W_N^{-kn} $$
  • The DFT = N samples of the DTFT of one period: \( X[k] = X(e^{j\Omega})|_{\Omega = 2\pi k/N} \); bin spacing (frequency resolution) = f_s/N.
  • Everything is circular (mod N): shifts, symmetry, and especially convolution — multiplying DFTs gives circular convolution. Linear convolution of lengths L and M via DFTs requires zero-padding to N ≥ L + M − 1 (overlap-add / overlap-save for streaming).
  • Properties: linearity; circular shift x[(n−m)_N] ↔ W_N^{km}X[k]; Parseval \( \sum|x|^2 = \tfrac1N\sum|X|^2 \); real x[n] → conjugate symmetry X[N−k] = X*[k]; X[0] = Σx[n] (DC bin).
  • W_N (twiddle) properties: periodicity \(W_N^{k+N}=W_N^k\), symmetry \(W_N^{k+N/2} = -W_N^k\) — the two identities that make the FFT possible.
  • Leakage: a tone not centred on a bin smears across the spectrum (rect-window sinc sidelobes); windows (Hann, Hamming, Blackman) trade main-lobe width vs sidelobe level; zero-padding interpolates the display but adds no true resolution.
UGC NET focus Compute small DFTs (N = 2, 4) directly; resolution f_s/N numericals; circular vs linear convolution and the L+M−1 padding rule; conjugate-symmetry of real-signal DFTs; periodicity condition for DT sinusoids.

§ 3.19Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)

The FFT (Cooley–Tukey, 1965) is an algorithm computing the DFT exactly — same output, fewer operations — by recursively splitting the N-point DFT using twiddle-factor symmetry/periodicity.

Complexity (the headline result) $$ \text{Direct DFT: } N^{2}\ \text{complex multiplications} \quad\longrightarrow\quad \text{Radix-2 FFT: } \frac{N}{2}\log_2 N \ \text{mult},\ \ N\log_2 N\ \text{add} $$

N = 1024: ~10⁶ → ~5×10³ multiplications (factor ≈ 200 saving).

  • Radix-2 DIT (decimation-in-time): split x[n] into even/odd-indexed halves: \( X[k] = E[k] + W_N^k O[k] \), \( X[k+N/2] = E[k] - W_N^k O[k] \) — the butterfly. Requires N = 2^m; log₂N stages × N/2 butterflies.
  • DIT: input in bit-reversed order, output natural; DIF (decimation-in-frequency): input natural, output bit-reversed. Both in-place (memory-efficient).
  • Variants: radix-4, split-radix (fewer mults), mixed-radix/prime-factor for composite N; Goertzel algorithm when only a few bins are needed (DTMF detection); real-input FFTs halve work.
  • Applications: fast spectral analysis, fast convolution/correlation (filtering long sequences), OFDM modems (IFFT/FFT at transmitter/receiver), radar/sonar Doppler processing, image processing.
UGC NET focus Counting questions: stages = log₂N, butterflies/stage = N/2, total mult = (N/2)log₂N (e.g., N = 8 → 12); bit-reversal ordering (for N = 8: 0,4,2,6,1,5,3,7); FFT computes the DFT exactly — it is not an approximation.

§ 3.20DSP Basics & Digital Filters: IIR and FIR

DSP system anatomy

x(t) → anti-alias LPF → S/H + ADC (quantization: SQNR ≈ 6.02b + 1.76 dB for b bits) → processor (MAC-centric DSP/FPGA) → DAC → reconstruction (smoothing) LPF → y(t). Merits over analog: programmability, exact repeatability, no drift/aging, easy storage, adaptive and linear-phase filters possible; costs: bandwidth limited by f_s, quantization/round-off noise, power.

LTI difference equation and transfer function:

General digital filter $$ y[n] = \sum_{k=0}^{M} b_k\,x[n-k] \; - \; \sum_{k=1}^{N} a_k\,y[n-k] \quad\Longleftrightarrow\quad H(z) = \frac{\sum b_kz^{-k}}{1 + \sum a_kz^{-k}} $$

FIR filters

  • All a_k = 0 → output from a finite window of inputs (non-recursive, all-zero, "moving average"); h[n] has length M+1; always stable.
  • Exactly linear phase if coefficients are symmetric or antisymmetric: h[n] = ±h[M−n] (four types); group delay constant = M/2 samples → distortionless filtering (audio, biomedical, data).
  • Design: windowing of the ideal sinc impulse response (rect → −13 dB sidelobes; Hamming −43 dB; Blackman −58 dB; Kaiser adjustable), frequency sampling, optimal equiripple Parks–McClellan (Remez).
  • Cost: high order (often 10× IIR) for sharp cutoffs → more MACs/delay.

IIR filters

  • Feedback (a_k ≠ 0) → infinite impulse response; poles anywhere inside the unit circle; stable iff all poles inside |z| = 1.
  • Designed from analog prototypes (Butterworth/Chebyshev/elliptic) via:
    • Impulse invariance: h[n] = T·h_a(nT); preserves time response; aliases — LP/BP only.
    • Bilinear transform: \( s = \tfrac{2}{T}\tfrac{1-z^{-1}}{1+z^{-1}} \) — one-to-one jω-axis → unit circle, no aliasing, but frequency warping \( \omega_a = \tfrac{2}{T}\tan(\Omega/2) \) (pre-warp the critical frequencies).
  • Efficient (low order, low delay) but nonlinear phase; coefficient quantization can destabilize → implement as cascaded second-order sections (biquads).
IIR vs FIR — the definitive comparison
FIRIIR
FeedbackNone (non-recursive)Recursive
StabilityGuaranteedConditional (poles in unit circle)
Linear phaseExact (symmetric h)Not achievable (approx. only)
Order for sharp cutoffHighLow (efficient)
Analog heritageNone neededButterworth/Chebyshev/elliptic
Quantization sensitivityLowHigher (limit cycles possible)
Typical useLinear-phase, adaptive, multirateSharp selective filtering at low cost
UGC NET focus 6 dB/bit SQNR; FIR linear-phase symmetry condition and delay M/2; bilinear warping formula and pre-warping; impulse-invariance aliasing flaw; stability tests on given H(z); window sidelobe ordering.

§ 3.21Unit-3 Formula Sheet

One-stop formula table — Unit 3
TopicFormulaNotes
Graph countstwigs = n − 1; links = b − n + 1KCL / KVL equation counts
Max power transfer\( Z_L = Z_{Th}^* ;\ P_{max} = V_{Th}^2/4R_{Th} \) (RMS)η = 50%
Millman\( V = \sum V_iG_i / \sum G_i \)parallel branches
Series resonance\( \omega_0 = 1/\sqrt{LC};\ Q = \omega_0L/R;\ BW = \omega_0/Q \)V_L = V_C = QV_s
Parallel tank\( R_{dyn} = L/RC \)Z max, I min
First-order transient\( x(t) = x_\infty + (x_{0^+} - x_\infty)e^{-t/\tau} \)τ = RC or L/R; 63.2% at τ
RLC damping\( \alpha = R/2L;\ \zeta = \alpha/\omega_0 = \tfrac{R}{2}\sqrt{C/L} \)critical R = 2√(L/C)
Laplace IVT/FVT\( f(0^+) = \lim_{s\to\infty}sF;\ f(\infty) = \lim_{s\to0}sF \)FVT: poles of sF in LHP
FS coefficients\( c_n = \tfrac1T\int_T f e^{-jn\omega_0t}dt \)Parseval P = Σ|c_n|²
FT pair (gate)rect(t/τ) ↔ τ sinc(ωτ/2)time–BW inverse
Z-pairaⁿu[n] ↔ z/(z−a), |z|>|a|stability: poles in unit circle
Rise time\( t_r \approx 0.35/BW \) (Hz); \( t_r = 2.2\tau \)first-order
2nd-order metrics\( M_p = e^{-\pi\zeta/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}};\ t_s = 4/\zeta\omega_n \)ω_d = ω_n√(1−ζ²)
Bode slopespole −20 dB/dec; zero +20; quadratic −40−3 dB at corner
RC cutoff\( f_c = 1/2\pi RC \)LP/HP first order
Constant-k LP\( f_c = 1/\pi\sqrt{LC};\ R_0 = \sqrt{L/C} \)HP: 1/4π√LC
m-derived\( m = \sqrt{1-(f_c/f_\infty)^2} \)m = 0.6 for matching
Two-port testsreciprocal: AD−BC = 1; symmetric: A = Dz₁₂ = z₂₁; h₁₂ = −h₂₁
Cascade[ABCD] = [ABCD]₁ × [ABCD]₂series→Z add; parallel→Y add
State space\( H(s) = C(sI−A)^{-1}B + D \)poles = eig(A); Φ = e^{At}
Sampling\( f_s \ge 2f_m \); alias at |f − kf_s|resolution after DFT: f_s/N
DFT\( X[k] = \sum x[n]W_N^{kn} \)circular conv.; pad to L+M−1
FFT cost(N/2)log₂N mult vs N²stages = log₂N
SQNR≈ 6.02b + 1.76 dB~6 dB per bit
Bilinear transform\( s = \tfrac{2}{T}\tfrac{1-z^{-1}}{1+z^{-1}};\ \omega_a = \tfrac{2}{T}\tan\tfrac{\Omega}{2} \)pre-warp; no aliasing
FIR linear phaseh[n] = ±h[M−n]; delay M/2always stable

§ 3.22Quick Revision Notes — Unit 3 in 25 Points

Rapid-fire recap (last-day revision)

  1. i_L and v_C cannot jump; DC steady state: L = short, C = open; at t = 0⁺ (relaxed): L = open, C = short.
  2. Graph: twigs n − 1 (KCL count), links b − n + 1 (KVL count); a tree spans all nodes, no loops.
  3. Supernode = voltage source between non-reference nodes; supermesh = shared current source; dependent sources are never killed.
  4. Superposition: responses add, power does not; valid only for linear networks.
  5. Thevenin/Norton: V_Th = V_OC, Z_Th = V_OC/I_SC with dependent sources; conversion V_Th = I_N Z_Th.
  6. MPT: Z_L = Z_Th* → P_max = V_Th²/4R_Th (RMS), efficiency 50%; magnitude-only case |Z_L| = |Z_Th|.
  7. Tellegen Σv_bi_b = 0 needs only KCL + KVL; reciprocity needs linear bilateral (no controlled sources).
  8. Series resonance: Z min, I max, unity PF, V_L = V_C = QV; parallel: Z max = L/CR, I min.
  9. Q = ω₀L/R = (1/R)√(L/C); BW = ω₀/Q; ω₀ = √(ω₁ω₂).
  10. One-τ rule: 63.2%; 5τ done; capacitor charging wastes exactly half the source energy.
  11. RLC: critical R = 2√(L/C); ζ = R/2 · √(C/L) (series); ringing at ω_d = ω₀√(1−ζ²); ζ = 1/2Q.
  12. Laplace: f′ → sF − f(0⁻); FVT only if poles of sF(s) in LHP (fails for oscillations).
  13. Fourier symmetry: even→cos, odd→sin, half-wave→odd harmonics only; Gibbs ≈ 9% overshoot.
  14. rect ↔ sinc; narrow in time = wide in frequency; real signal → |X| even, ∠X odd.
  15. Z-transform: ROC determines the sequence; causal+stable ⇔ poles inside unit circle ⇔ ROC ⊇ |z| = 1; z = e^{sT}.
  16. t_r·BW ≈ 0.35; overshoot e^{−πζ/√(1−ζ²)}; settling ≈ 4/ζωₙ; resonant peak only for ζ < 0.707.
  17. Poles = natural frequencies; LHP = stable; jω simple = marginal; LC immittances: poles/zeros alternate on jω axis.
  18. Bode: ±20 dB/dec per simple zero/pole, −40 for quadratic; −3 dB and −45° at the corner; −20 dB/dec = −6 dB/octave.
  19. Filter cutoffs: RC → 1/2πRC; constant-k LP → 1/π√LC; HP → 1/4π√LC; R₀ = √(L/C); m-derived adds f_∞ for a sharp edge, m = 0.6 ends for matching.
  20. Two-port: reciprocity z₁₂ = z₂₁ / AD − BC = 1 / h₁₂ = −h₂₁; symmetry z₁₁ = z₂₂ / A = D; cascade multiplies ABCD.
  21. State space: x = (v_C, i_L); poles = eigenvalues of A; Φ(t) = e^{At}, Φ(0) = I.
  22. Sampling: f_s ≥ 2f_m; alias of f appears at |f − kf_s|; anti-alias filter must precede the ADC; CD = 44.1 kHz.
  23. DFT bin spacing = f_s/N; DFT products give circular convolution — zero-pad to L + M − 1 for linear.
  24. FFT: exact DFT in (N/2)log₂N mults (N = 8 → 12), log₂N stages, bit-reversed I/O; basis of OFDM.
  25. FIR: always stable, exact linear phase if h[n] = ±h[M−n], delay M/2. IIR: efficient but conditional stability, nonlinear phase; bilinear transform warps — pre-warp critical frequencies. SQNR ≈ 6 dB/bit.

↑ Back to top of Unit 3