Electrical & Electronics Engineering

High Voltage Engineering

A Comprehensive Lecture Series

Author: Dr. Mithun Mondal BITS Pilani – Hyderabad Campus EEE | GATE Preparation | University Examinations
Overview

Course Outline

High Voltage Engineering is a core subject for power-systems engineers covering the generation, measurement, and withstand of voltages far beyond normal operating levels. It is indispensable for designing insulation in transformers, cables, switchgear, transmission lines, and modern HVDC links. The subject is organised into six thematic parts.

Part I – Fundamentals

  • Electric stress estimation & control
  • Breakdown in gases, liquids, solids, vacuum

Part II – Generation

  • HV DC and AC generation
  • Impulse voltage and current generation

Part III – Measurement

  • Sphere gaps, ESV, generating voltmeter
  • Voltage dividers, Chubb–Fortescue method

Part IV – Testing & Diagnostics

  • HV testing of cables, transformers, breakers
  • Schering bridge, partial discharge, NDT

Part V – System Aspects

  • Transients, travelling waves, lightning
  • Insulation coordination & protection

Part VI – Modern Applications

  • Pulsed power, PEF, electroporation
  • HVDC, GIS, smart-grid monitoring
Why High Voltage Engineering?

Power transmission economics demand higher voltages: \(P\propto V^2/Z\) while line losses scale as \(1/V^2\) for fixed power. Modern UHV-AC systems operate at 765 kV and 1100 kV; HVDC links reach \(\pm 800\) kV and \(\pm 1100\) kV. Insulation, not the conductors, sets the design ceiling. HV phenomena are governed by stochastic ionisation processes, making statistical design margins essential.

Section 1

Electric Stress Estimation and Control

Insulation breakdown is governed by the local electric field \(\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})\), not the applied voltage alone. Designers must determine \(E_\text{max}\) at every electrode triple junction, sharp edge, and void. Closed-form solutions exist only for a handful of geometries (parallel plate, coaxial, sphere–sphere). Real apparatus such as bushings, GIS spacers, and cable terminations requires numerical field computation.

Field-Computation Methods
  1. Finite Difference Method (FDM) – regular mesh, simple implementation
  2. Finite Element Method (FEM) – general geometry, multi-dielectric
  3. Charge Simulation Method (CSM) – efficient for smooth electrodes
  4. Surface Charge Simulation / BEM (SCSM)
  5. Experimental analogues – electrolytic tank, conducting-paper

Governing Field Equations

For a linear, isotropic, source-free dielectric region:

\[\nabla\cdot\mathbf{D}=\rho_v,\qquad \mathbf{D}=\varepsilon\mathbf{E},\qquad \mathbf{E}=-\nabla\varphi\]

Combining these gives the Poisson equation and, for the source-free case, the Laplace equation:

\[\nabla^{2}\varphi=-\frac{\rho_v}{\varepsilon}\qquad\xrightarrow{\rho_v=0}\qquad\boxed{\nabla^{2}\varphi=0}\]
Boundary Conditions
  • Dirichlet: \(\varphi=V_0\) on conductor surfaces.
  • Neumann: \(\partial\varphi/\partial n=0\) on planes of symmetry.
  • Interface: \(\varepsilon_1 E_{1n}=\varepsilon_2 E_{2n}\) and \(E_{1t}=E_{2t}\).

Finite Difference Method

Derivatives are replaced by finite differences on a regular mesh of step \(h\). The five-point Liebmann formula for a 2-D Laplace problem reads:

\[\varphi_{i,j}=\tfrac{1}{4}\!\left(\varphi_{i+1,j}+\varphi_{i-1,j}+\varphi_{i,j+1}+\varphi_{i,j-1}\right)\]

Iteration proceeds with successive over-relaxation (SOR) until \(\max|\Delta\varphi|<\varepsilon\); then \(\mathbf{E}=-\nabla\varphi\) is evaluated by central differences. FDM works best on rectangular domains but struggles with curved boundaries.

Charge Simulation Method

Fictitious line, point, or ring charges inside the electrodes replace the actual surface charge distribution. The potential at any field point is the superposition:

\[\varphi(\mathbf{r})=\sum_{j=1}^{n}q_j\,p_{ij}\]

where \(p_{ij}\) is the analytically known potential coefficient. Charge magnitudes are found by satisfying boundary conditions at \(n\) contour points. CSM is highly accurate for smooth electrodes with no mesh discretisation error.

Stress Control Techniques

Stress concentration is managed by: toroidal or hemispherical stress shields at conductor ends; grading electrodes in capacitor bushings and cable terminations; elimination of voids and delaminations in solid insulation; and application of field-grading materials (resistive or non-linear) at compound interfaces. The utilisation factor \(\eta=E_\text{avg}/E_\text{max}\) characterises how uniformly the insulation is stressed. For a coaxial geometry the optimal inner-conductor radius \(r_i=r_o/e\) maximises \(\eta\).

Section 2

Breakdown in Gaseous Dielectrics

Townsend Primary Ionisation Coefficient

Townsend's first ionisation coefficient \(\alpha\) (ions produced per electron per unit length) governs avalanche growth. The current after a path \(d\) is:

\[I=I_0\,e^{\alpha d}\]

The coefficient is expressed as \(\alpha/p=A\,e^{-Bp/E}\). For air: \(A\approx15\;\text{cm}^{-1}\text{Torr}^{-1}\), \(B\approx365\;\text{V/(cm\cdot Torr)}\).

Secondary Processes and Townsend's \(\gamma\)

Electrons are liberated from the cathode by positive-ion impact (\(\gamma_i\)), photons (\(\gamma_p\)), and metastables (\(\gamma_m\)), with \(\gamma=\gamma_i+\gamma_p+\gamma_m\). Including secondary emission:

\[\boxed{I=\frac{I_0\,e^{\alpha d}}{1-\gamma\!\left(e^{\alpha d}-1\right)}}\]

The Townsend breakdown criterion (denominator to zero) is:

\[\gamma\!\left(e^{\alpha d}-1\right)=1\qquad\Longleftrightarrow\qquad\boxed{\alpha d=\ln\!\left(1+\frac{1}{\gamma}\right)}\]

Streamer (Kanal) Mechanism

For atmospheric pressure with \(pd>200\;\text{Torr\cdot cm}\), breakdown occurs in \(\sim10^{-8}\;\text{s}\) – too fast for ion feedback. Raether–Meek streamer theory: a single avalanche of \(\sim10^8\) electrons generates a space-charge field \(E_r\) comparable to the applied field \(E_0\). Photons from the avalanche head trigger secondary avalanches that are sucked into the positive-ion trail, forming a cathode-directed streamer. The weakly conducting plasma channel (kanal) bridges the gap. The Meek criterion (air, 1 atm) is:

\[\alpha\,x_c=17.7+\ln x_c+\ln(E_r/E_0)\approx 20\]

Paschen's Law

Setting \(E=V/d\) in the Townsend criterion and using \(\alpha/p=A\,e^{-Bp/E}\) gives \(V_s=f(pd)\):

\[\boxed{V_s=\frac{B\,(pd)}{\ln\!\left[\dfrac{A\,(pd)}{\ln(1+1/\gamma)}\right]}}\]

The Paschen curve has a minimum at \((pd)_\text{min}\). For air (\(\gamma=0.01\)): \(V_{s,\text{min}}\approx305\;\text{V}\) at \((pd)_\text{min}\approx0.84\;\text{Torr\cdot cm}\). Below the minimum: too few collisions; above: too many collisions for adequate energy gain.

Paschen curve for air on log-log axes showing sparking voltage versus pd product with minimum near 305 V at pd 0.84 Torr cm
Paschen curve for air (\(\gamma=0.01\), \(A=15\), \(B=365\)). The minimum breakdown voltage of approximately 305 V occurs at \(pd\approx0.84\;\text{Torr\cdot cm}\). Both axes are logarithmic. Below the minimum, too few collisions occur for ionisation; above it, electrons lose energy to collisions before gaining sufficient kinetic energy.

Penning Effect, Corona, and Time-Lag

Penning effect: Small admixtures of a low-ionisation-potential gas (e.g., Ar in Ne) drastically reduce breakdown voltage via collisional ionisation of the impurity by host metastables. This effect is exploited in gas-filled surge protectors.

Corona discharges occur where the local field exceeds the critical ionisation field in non-uniform geometries. Peek's formula for the disruptive critical field on a cylindrical conductor is:

\[E_v=30\,m\,\delta\!\left(1+\frac{0.301}{\sqrt{\delta r}}\right)\;\text{kV/cm (peak)}\]

where \(\delta\) is the relative air density, \(m\) is a surface roughness factor, and \(r\) is the conductor radius in cm. Power loss follows the Peterson formula: \(P_c\propto(f+25)\,(V-V_c)^2\).

Time-lag: \(t_l=t_s+t_f\), where \(t_s\) is the statistical time-lag (waiting for an initiatory electron) and \(t_f\) is the formative time-lag (\(\sim10\;\mu\text{s}\) for a streamer).

Breakdown in SF₆ and Vacuum

SF₆ is strongly electronegative: \(e^-+\text{SF}_6\to\text{SF}_6^-\). Effective ionisation coefficient \(\bar\alpha=\alpha-\eta\). Critical field: \((E/p)_\text{cr}\approx89\;\text{kV/(cm\cdot bar)}\). Dielectric strength \(\approx2.5\times\) air at 1 bar and \(\approx5\times\) at 3 bar. GWP \(\approx23{,}500\); toxic decomposition products (SOF₂, SO₂F₂). Modern alternatives: g³, C5/C4 fluoronitriles.

Vacuum breakdown (<\(10^{-4}\;\text{Pa}\)) is governed by Cranberg's clump hypothesis and field emission from microprotrusions (Fowler–Nordheim: \(J=AE^2\exp(-B/E)\)). Empirically \(V_b=K\,d^n\), \(n\approx0.5\text{–}0.7\).

Section 3

Breakdown in Liquid and Solid Dielectrics

Liquid Dielectrics

Pure liquids can withstand \(E_b\approx1\;\text{MV/cm}\) in highly purified, degassed form. Commercial transformer oil is dominated by impurities through two principal mechanisms:

Suspended-Particle Mechanism

A particle of permittivity \(\varepsilon_2\) in a liquid of \(\varepsilon_1\) experiences a dielectrophoretic force toward the high-field region: \[F=\tfrac{1}{2}V_p(\varepsilon_2-\varepsilon_1)\nabla|\mathbf{E}|^2\] Particles chain into a low-impedance bridge, triggering breakdown.

Cavity Breakdown

Dissolved gas comes out of solution under stress. The cavity field is amplified by \(\varepsilon_l/\varepsilon_g\). The cavity ionises first and initiates a streamer into the liquid.

Treatment and Testing of Transformer Oil

Treatment steps: filtration through fuller's earth or molecular sieves (removes particles and polar compounds); centrifuging (removes free water and sludge); vacuum dehydration and degassing (target <10 ppm H₂O). Standard tests include the BDV test (two brass spheres, 2.5 mm gap, 2 kV/s ramp; minimum 30 kV new, 40 kV treated), tan-δ at 50 Hz and 90°C, Karl Fischer moisture titration, dissolved-gas analysis (DGA), and interfacial tension.

Solid Dielectric Breakdown – Five Mechanisms

1. Intrinsic Breakdown

Pure solids, \(\sim10^{-8}\;\text{s}\). Electrons gain enough energy to ionise the lattice: \(E_{b,\text{intr}}=10^6\text{–}10^7\;\text{V/cm}\).

2. Electromechanical Breakdown

Compressive Maxwell stress \(\sigma=\tfrac{1}{2}\varepsilon E^2\) thins the dielectric until the local field reaches \(E_b\). The Stark–Garton criterion for the critical applied field is:

\[E_a=0.6\,\sqrt{\frac{Y}{\varepsilon}}\;\;\text{[V/m]}\]

where \(Y\) is the elastic modulus. This mechanism is relevant for soft polymer insulators.

3. Electrical and Water Treeing

Surface contamination combined with moisture creates conductive paths. Partial discharges erode the polymer, producing branching tree structures that propagate through XLPE cable insulation and ultimately cause breakdown.

4. Thermal Breakdown

When dielectric loss power \(\sigma E^2\) exceeds heat removed, a thermal runaway occurs. The energy balance is \(C\,dT/dt+\nabla\cdot\mathbf{q}=\sigma E^2\), yielding a critical voltage \(V_\text{th}\) above which temperature rises without bound.

5. Electrochemical Breakdown

Long-term ionic migration and electrolysis under DC stress cause progressive chemical degradation. Most relevant for paper-insulated cables under prolonged DC service.

Key Insight

Solid-dielectric breakdown in service is rarely an instantaneous intrinsic event. Ageing, void formation, and treeing dominate field life. Design life is determined by accumulated degradation, not a single-shot withstand value.

Solid Dielectrics in Power Apparatus

MaterialApparatusKey Properties
PorcelainOverhead/post insulatorsHigh mechanical strength; susceptible to surface leakage
Toughened glassDisc insulatorsVisible failure mode (shatters on puncture)
Mica / mica-paperRotating-machine slot insulationVery high \(E_b\); stable at elevated temperature
Kraft paper, pressboardOil-impregnated transformers, cablesCellulose base; low tan-δ when dry
PVC, PELow-voltage cablesInexpensive; thermal limit 70°C
XLPEMV/HV cables up to 500 kVCross-linked; \(T_\text{max}=90\)°C; PD-sensitive
EPDM, silicone rubberComposite insulators, terminationsHydrophobic; UV-stable; flexible
Epoxy resinBushings, GIS spacers, CT/PTCastable; mechanically strong; low tan-δ
PTFE, polyimideSpacecraft, high-temperature apparatusExtreme thermal stability; low dielectric loss
Section 4

Generation of High DC, AC, and Impulse Voltages

High DC Voltage Generation

Half-Wave Rectifier and Ripple Analysis

The basic arrangement (HV diode + HV transformer + smoothing capacitor) delivers ripple and voltage drop for a load \(R\) with capacitor \(C\) at frequency \(f\):

\[\Delta V\approx\frac{I}{fC}=\frac{V}{fRC},\qquad\delta V=\frac{\Delta V}{2}\]

Voltage regulation \(\eta_v=(V_\text{nl}-V_\text{fl})/V_\text{nl}\). Diode PIV must be \(\ge2V_\text{max}\). The output is limited by the transformer rating, which motivates voltage multipliers.

Half-wave HVDC rectifier showing AC source connected to step-up transformer whose secondary feeds an HV diode D then smoothing capacitor C in parallel with load resistor RL delivering positive DC output Vo
Half-wave HVDC rectifier circuit. The HV step-up transformer, series diode, and smoothing capacitor \(C\) deliver a DC output with ripple \(\Delta V\approx I/(fC)\) to the resistive load \(R_L\).

Cockcroft–Walton Voltage Multiplier

An \(n\)-stage CW multiplier cascades diode–capacitor stages to multiply the transformer peak. Ideal no-load output: \(V_0=2n\,V_\text{ac,peak}\). With load current \(I\):

\[\Delta V_{nl}=\frac{I}{fC}\!\left(\frac{2n^3}{3}+\frac{n^2}{2}-\frac{n}{6}\right),\qquad n_\text{opt}\approx\sqrt{\frac{V_\text{max}\,fC}{I}}\]
Cockcroft-Walton n-stage voltage multiplier ladder circuit showing diodes and capacitors arranged to produce output 2nVpeak from an input AC peak voltage Vpeak
Cockcroft–Walton voltage-multiplier ladder. Each stage adds \(2V_\text{peak}\) to the output in the no-load condition. The optimum number of stages \(n_\text{opt}\) minimises the combined voltage drop for a specified load current and supply frequency.

High AC Voltage Generation

Cascaded (series-stacked) transformers allow individual units to have moderate ratings while the series stack delivers the full test voltage. Series-resonant test sets (variable-frequency or variable-inductance) tune the test object capacitance into resonance, dramatically reducing the required source apparent power since the reactive energy is supplied by the resonant circuit.

Impulse Voltage Generation

Standard Impulse Waveforms

The standard full lightning impulse is \(1.2/50\;\mu\text{s}\) (\(T_1=1.2\;\mu\text{s}\) front, \(T_2=50\;\mu\text{s}\) tail, tolerances \(\pm30\%/\pm20\%\)). The switching impulse is \(250/2500\;\mu\text{s}\). A chopped impulse is truncated at 2–5 µs by a rod gap. The double-exponential form is:

\[v(t)=K\!\left(e^{-\alpha t}-e^{-\beta t}\right)\]
Standard 1.2/50 microsecond lightning impulse waveform showing rapid rise to peak Vp at front time T1 1.2 microseconds and slower decay to half value at tail time T2 50 microseconds with dashed marker lines
Standard \(1.2/50\;\mu\text{s}\) lightning impulse waveform. The front time \(T_1=1.2\;\mu\text{s}\) is defined between the 30% and 90% rise points (via a virtual origin); the tail time \(T_2=50\;\mu\text{s}\) is the time from the virtual origin to the half-value point on the tail.

Single-Stage Impulse Generator

Circuit (a): tail resistor \(R_2\) across load capacitance \(C_2\); front resistor \(R_1\) between \(C_1\) and \(C_2\). S-domain analysis gives a double-exponential output. Efficiency \(\approx95\%\) for practical \(1.2/50\;\mu\text{s}\) generators.

Circuit (b): \(R_1\) in series, \(R_2\) across \(C_1\). Approximate decoupled design (\(C_1\gg C_2\)): \(\tau_\text{tail}\approx R_2 C_1\), \(\tau_\text{front}\approx R_1 C_2\). For a 1.2/50 generator with a 1 nF load and \(C_1=1\;\mu\text{F}\):

\[R_1\approx\frac{T_1}{3C_2}\approx400\;\Omega,\qquad R_2\approx\frac{T_2}{0.7\,C_1}\approx70\;\Omega\]

Circuit (a) gives higher efficiency; Circuit (b) is preferred for multistage Marx generators due to smoother fronts on capacitive loads.

Multistage Marx Generator

\(n\) stage capacitors \(C_g\) are charged in parallel via \(R_c\), then discharged in series via spark gaps:

\[C_\text{eq}=\frac{C_g}{n},\qquad V_\text{out}\approx n\,V_0\,\eta,\qquad W=\tfrac{1}{2}\,n\,C_g\,V_0^2\]

The first gap is triggered (trigatron or laser-triggered gap); the cascade completes in \(\sim100\;\text{ns}\). Practical ratings: 200 kV/stage, 4–12 stages, 200 kJ to several MJ.

Three-stage Marx impulse generator schematic showing three stage capacitors C1 C2 C3 connected in parallel via charging resistors Rc to DC supply rails then discharged in series through spark gaps G1 G2 through front resistor R1 to produce output voltage approximately 3V0 across load capacitor C2
Three-stage Marx generator schematic. Stage capacitors are charged in parallel to \(V_0\) via high-resistance charging resistors. After triggering of all \(n\) spark gaps the capacitors appear in series, producing \(V_\text{out}\approx nV_0\) on open circuit. The front resistor \(R_1\) shapes the rise time.

Impulse Current Generation

Standard waveforms: \(8/20\;\mu\text{s}\) (lightning arrester testing) and \(4/10\;\mu\text{s}\). An RLC circuit produces:

\[i(t)=\frac{V_0}{\omega L}\,e^{-\alpha t}\sin(\omega t),\quad\alpha=\frac{R}{2L},\quad\omega=\sqrt{\frac{1}{LC}-\alpha^2}\]

For \(8/20\;\mu\text{s}\): \(L\sim\text{few}\;\mu\text{H}\), \(C\sim100\;\mu\text{F}\) at 100 kV, giving \(\sim100\;\text{kA}\) peak. A crowbar switch suppresses the oscillating tail. Long rectangular pulses use a pulse-forming network (PFN) matched to the load: \(Z_0=\sqrt{L/C}\).

Section 5

Measurement of High Voltages and Currents

MethodQuantity MeasuredRange / Typical Use
Sphere gapPeak (DC, AC, impulse)Up to 2.5 MV; reference standard
Uniform-field gap (Bruce)PeakLaboratory standard, ±1–2%
Rod gapPeakUp to 1 MV; ±8%; less accurate
Electrostatic voltmeter (ESV)RMS / DCUp to 1 MV; <10 mA loading
Generating voltmeterDC only0–±500 kV; no source loading
Chubb–FortescueAC peak50 Hz, accurate and simple
Resistive dividerDC, AC, low-freq. impulseLoading \(V^2/R\) sets limit
Capacitive dividerAC, impulseLow loss; frequency-dependent
Damped capacitive (mixed) dividerImpulse frontBest impulse-front fidelity

Sphere Gap

Two equal-diameter metallic spheres separated by gap \(S\). The breakdown voltage \(V_b(D,S)\) is tabulated at standard conditions (\(p_0=101.3\;\text{kPa}\), \(T_0=20°\text{C}\), \(h_0=11\;\text{g/m}^3\)). Air-density correction:

\[V_b=V_{b,0}\,\delta,\qquad\delta=\frac{p}{p_0}\cdot\frac{273+T_0}{273+T}\]

Humidity correction \(k_h\) applies for AC/DC; not for impulse. Rules: use \(S/D\le0.5\) for accuracy \(\pm3\%\); keep surrounding objects \(\ge5D\) away; apply UV illumination for AC below 50 kV.

Sphere gap measurement configuration showing two equal metal spheres of diameter D separated by gap S with HV applied to the upper sphere and lower sphere grounded and a spark discharge in the gap
Sphere-gap configuration for peak voltage measurement. Breakdown voltage is tabulated versus sphere diameter \(D\) and gap spacing \(S\) at standard atmospheric conditions; correction factors \(\delta\) and \(k_h\) are applied for actual temperature, pressure, and humidity.

Electrostatic Voltmeter (ESV)

Two parallel discs, area \(A\), separation \(d\). Attractive force:

\[F=\frac{\varepsilon_0 A\,V^2}{2d^2}\]

An attracted-disc ESV measures \(V\) (DC or RMS AC) via suspension torque against a counter-spring. Advantages: negligible loading, reads true RMS of any waveform, range up to ~1 MV. Limitations: dust sensitivity, mechanical damping requirement, calibration drift.

Generating Voltmeter

A grounded rotor disc periodically exposes and screens an electrode at HV potential, creating \(C(t)=C_0+C_m\cos\omega t\). The induced current is:

\[i(t)=V_\text{dc}\,\frac{dC}{dt}=-V_\text{dc}\,C_m\,\omega\,\sin\omega t\]

Peak current is proportional to \(V_\text{dc}\). The generating voltmeter reads only DC or very slowly changing voltages – it does not respond to AC peak, unlike the Chubb–Fortescue method.

Chubb–Fortescue Method

A series capacitor \(C\) is connected to the HV; the AC current through it is half-wave rectified. The average rectified current equals \(2fCV_\text{pk}\), giving:

\[V_\text{pk}=\frac{I_\text{avg}}{2fC}\]

This is the standard method for measuring AC peak voltage at power frequency. Sphere-gap calibration depends on the peak value, not the RMS.

Voltage Dividers

Resistive dividers serve DC and slow impulse fronts. Capacitive dividers suit AC and switching impulses. Mixed (damped capacitive) dividers optimally capture both the front and tail of lightning impulses. The step-response settling time of the divider–cable system must be well within the impulse front time.

Section 6

HV Testing of Power Apparatus

Insulators

Routine tests: power-frequency dry and wet withstand (1 min) and visible-discharge tests. Type tests: impulse withstand and 50% flashover (positive and negative polarity), pollution tests (salt-fog and solid-layer methods), corona extinction voltage, and radio-influence voltage (RIV). Composite silicone-rubber insulators are increasingly preferred over porcelain and glass for superior hydrophobicity and pollution performance.

Cables

PILC cables: DC pressure test at \(V_\text{dc}=2.4\,V_0\) for 15 min. Modern XLPE cables: AC at 0.1 Hz (VLF) – capacitive kVA is dramatically reduced at this frequency. Type tests add bending, thermal cycling with PD monitoring, lightning impulse (\(\pm10\) shots), and long-duration AC. Site tests use TDR-based PD mapping for defect location.

Caution

DC testing of aged XLPE cables generates space charges that can cause failure under subsequent AC service voltage. DC testing of XLPE is therefore avoided in modern practice; VLF AC is the standard alternative.

Bushings, Capacitors, and Transformers

Bushing tests: power-frequency withstand (dry/wet), lightning impulse (full and chopped), switching impulse (≥300 kV), PD (\(\le10\;\text{pC}\) at \(1.5U_m/\sqrt3\)), and tan-δ. Power transformer type tests: separate-source AC withstand; induced overvoltage withstand with simultaneous PD; lightning impulse (full and chopped) on each line terminal; switching impulse for \(U_m\ge245\;\text{kV}\).

Circuit Breakers

Asymmetrical fault tests apply short-circuit currents including a DC offset; the breaker is rated for making, breaking, short-time, and short-circuit duty. Synthetic test circuits (current-injection and voltage-injection methods, Weil–Dobke circuit) are used when laboratory short-circuit power is insufficient. The transient recovery voltage (TRV) is specified by its rate of rise (RRRV) and peak factor; the breaker must withstand the TRV without re-strike.

Section 7

Non-Destructive Insulation Testing

Dielectric Loss and tan-δ

For a sinusoidal field, complex permittivity is \(\varepsilon^*=\varepsilon'-j\varepsilon''\) and:

\[\boxed{\tan\delta=\frac{\varepsilon''}{\varepsilon'}=\frac{1}{\omega R_p C_p}}\]

Power dissipated per unit volume: \(p=\omega\varepsilon_0\varepsilon'' E^2\). Loss mechanisms: conduction (low frequency), dipolar Debye relaxation (peak at \(\omega\tau=1\)), interfacial Maxwell–Wagner (composites), and resonance (IR, UV). Tan-δ is the most sensitive bulk indicator of insulation health – it rises with moisture, contamination, and void formation long before breakdown. Routinely measured on cables, bushings, transformers, and capacitors.

Schering Bridge

The unknown specimen \(C_x\) (with loss \(R_x\)) is compared against a loss-free standard \(C_N\). Balance condition \(\mathbf{Z}_1\mathbf{Z}_4=\mathbf{Z}_2\mathbf{Z}_3\) gives:

\[\boxed{C_x=\frac{R_4}{R_3}\,C_N,\qquad\tan\delta=\omega R_4 C_4}\]
Schering bridge circuit with four arms: arm AB containing test specimen Cx in series with Rx, arm BC containing standard capacitor CN, arm CD containing R4 parallel C4, arm DA containing R3, with HV AC source on diagonal DB and null detector on diagonal AC
Schering bridge for measurement of insulation capacitance \(C_x\) and loss factor \(\tan\delta\). At balance, \(C_x=(R_4/R_3)C_N\) and \(\tan\delta=\omega R_4 C_4\). The HV source is applied across the \(D\)–\(B\) diagonal; the null detector bridges \(A\)–\(C\).

Variants: inverted bridge for grounded specimens; high-loss bridge with \(C_4\) across \(C_N\) for \(\tan\delta>0.1\); Wagner earth to eliminate stray capacitance currents; transformer ratio-arm bridge (TRAB) with inductively coupled ratio arms for superior stability and immunity to strays.

Partial Discharge Measurement

A partial discharge is a localised discharge that only partially bridges the insulation between conductors. Types: internal PD (voids in solid/liquid insulation), surface PD (solid–gas interface), corona (HV conductors in gas).

The Gemant–Philippoff a-b-c circuit models a void of capacitance \(C_c\) in series with \(C_b\) and in parallel with sound dielectric \(C_a\). The apparent charge transferred at the terminals when a void discharge \(\Delta V_c\) occurs is:

\[q=\Delta V_c\cdot\frac{C_b C_c}{C_b+C_c}\approx C_b\,\Delta V_c\]

Inception voltage \(V_i\) is the lowest voltage at which PD just starts; extinction voltage \(V_e<V_i\) due to space-charge remnants. Detection: coupling capacitor \(C_k\) in parallel with the test object and detection impedance \(Z_d\); calibrator injects known charge \(q_0\). Phase-resolved PD (PRPD) pattern recognition identifies discharge type. On-line detection uses UHF sensors (300–3000 MHz) in GIS, HFCT/TEV on cables, and acoustic emission in transformers.

Other Diagnostic Techniques

Frequency-response analysis (FRA) detects winding deformations in transformers by comparing transfer-function fingerprints over time. Dissolved-gas analysis (DGA) identifies thermal and electrical faults via oil chromatography, interpreted through Rogers/Doernenburg ratios or the Duval triangle. Polarisation/depolarisation current (PDC) and recovery voltage measurement (RVM) infer moisture in cellulose insulation via low-frequency dielectric response. Thermography, on-line UHF PD, and distributed temperature sensing (DTS) via optical fibre are modern asset-management staples.

Section 8

Transients and Insulation Coordination

Even in a 50 Hz network the insulation is sized by transient overvoltages: lightning (µs scale, peaks several MV); switching (100 µs–ms, 2–3 p.u.); temporary overvoltages (TOV) (s–min, from load rejection or ferroresonance). Per-unit base: \(V_\text{base}=U_m\sqrt2/\sqrt3\) (peak phase voltage).

RLC Transients

For a series RLC step input \(V_0\):

\[\zeta=\frac{R}{2}\sqrt{\frac{C}{L}},\qquad\omega_n=\frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}\]

Underdamped (\(\zeta<1\)): oscillatory overshoot peaking at \(V_{C,\text{max}}=V_0(1+e^{-\pi\zeta/\sqrt{1-\zeta^2}})\). Critically damped and overdamped cases have exponential decays without oscillation.

Travelling Waves on Transmission Lines

Wave propagation velocity and surge impedance of a lossless line:

\[v=\frac{1}{\sqrt{LC}}=c\;\text{(air)},\qquad Z_0=\sqrt{\frac{L}{C}}\]

At a junction between lines of surge impedances \(Z_1\) and \(Z_2\):

\[\Gamma=\frac{Z_2-Z_1}{Z_2+Z_1},\qquad\tau=\frac{2Z_2}{Z_2+Z_1}\]

Open circuit (\(Z_2\to\infty\)): \(\Gamma=+1\), voltage doubles. Short circuit (\(Z_2=0\)): \(\Gamma=-1\), voltage collapses. Matched (\(Z_2=Z_1\)): \(\Gamma=0\), no reflection.

Switching Surge and Gallet Equation

The 50% flashover voltage of an air gap under switching impulse (Gallet equation):

\[V_{50,\text{SI}}=\frac{3400}{1+8/d}\;\text{kV (peak)},\quad d\text{ in m}\]

Statistical spread: \(\sigma_p\approx6\%\) (LI), 8% (SI). Withstand voltage:

\[V_w=V_{50}(1-Z_\alpha\,\sigma_p),\qquad Z_\alpha=1.282\;\text{(10% risk)}\]

Insulation Coordination – Conventional Method

The design goal:

\[V_\text{withstand}(\text{equipment})>V_\text{protective}(\text{arrester})\times\text{margin}\]

Deterministic procedure: determine maximum surge \(V_s\); choose \(\text{BIL}\ge V_s\times1.2\text{–}1.4\); verify V–t coordination (arrester V–t curve must lie below equipment's V–t curve over the full time-to-flashover range). For Range I (\(U_m\le245\;\text{kV}\)): primary criterion is BIL. For Range II (\(U_m\ge300\;\text{kV}\)): SIWL takes precedence.

Insulation Coordination – Statistical Method

Both stress and strength are random variables. Risk of failure:

\[R=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f_s(V)\,P(V)\,dV\]

Statistical safety factor \(\gamma_s=V_{w,\text{stat}}/V_{s,\text{stat}}\) uses the 10% withstand voltage and 2% stress voltage. Field/EMTP simulations establish the overvoltage distribution. If \(R\) exceeds the acceptable level (\(10^{-3}\)/yr typical), insulation is strengthened or protection improved.

Surge Arresters

Modern metal-oxide (ZnO) gapless arresters have a highly non-linear V–I characteristic \(I=kV^\alpha\), \(\alpha\approx25\text{–}60\). Negligible leakage (\(\sim\)mA) at operating voltage; clamping to protective level \(U_p\) at nominal discharge current \(I_n\) (5, 10, or 20 kA). Coordination: \(\text{BIL}\ge U_p\times1.2\) (LI); \(\text{SIWL}\ge U_{p,\text{SI}}\times1.15\).

Log-log plot comparing V-I characteristics of ZnO metal oxide arrester alpha 40 and older SiC arrester alpha 5 showing ZnO knee point near 1 mA reference voltage and protective level Up at nominal discharge current In 10 kA
Comparative V–I characteristics of ZnO (gapless, \(\alpha\approx40\)) and SiC (\(\alpha\approx5\)) surge arresters. The flat ZnO characteristic from µA to A defines the leakage regime; the knee at ~1 mA is the reference voltage \(U_\text{ref}\). Above the knee, even tens of kA produce only ~1.4–2 p.u. clamping voltage, providing excellent overvoltage protection.

Ground Wires and Rotating Machine Protection

Shield wires intercept lightning before it reaches phase conductors. Effective shielding angle: ≤30° for ≤230 kV; ≤15° for ≥400 kV. Tower-footing resistance target <10 Ω. Rotating machines have low inter-turn BIL; steep-front surges produce uneven winding voltage distribution. Protection: surge arrester (limits magnitude) plus surge capacitor (~0.25 µF at motor terminals) reduces front time from µs to ~10 µs, equalising winding voltage distribution.

Section 9

Modern Applications of High Voltage Engineering

Pulsed Power Systems

Pulsed power converts long-timescale electrical energy into short, intense bursts (kV–MV at ns–µs). The energy compression chain: prime power (seconds) → capacitor charging (milliseconds) → pulse forming (microseconds) → switching/output (nanoseconds). Key components include capacitor banks, PFNs, Blumlein lines (SMES), triggered spark gaps, thyratrons, and IGBTs. Topologies include the Marx generator, transformer-based modulator, solid-state Marx, and linear transformer driver (LTD).

Applications: Pulsed Electric Field (PEF) food pasteurisation and electroporation for drug/gene delivery; X-ray flash radiography; ozone generation and pollution control; EUV light sources for semiconductor lithography; medical defibrillators, lithotripsy, and irreversible electroporation for tumour ablation.

Pulsed Electric Field (PEF)

Microsecond pulses of \(E\sim10\text{–}80\;\text{kV/cm}\) induce a transmembrane potential of ~1 V across cell membranes. Above the electroporation threshold, the lipid bilayer becomes permeable – reversibly (drug delivery) or irreversibly (sterilisation) depending on pulse energy. Pulse parameters: 10–60 kV, 1–100 µs width, 1 Hz to kHz repetition, 10–300 kJ/L specific energy. Mushroom-shaped electrodes provide uniform field with low erosion.

HVDC Transmission

Line-Commutated Converter (LCC)

Thyristor-based 12-pulse bridge; needs strong AC system; consumes 50–60% reactive power. Current direction fixed; power reversal by voltage polarity reversal. Voltages up to ±1100 kV (Changji–Guquan UHVDC).

Voltage-Source Converter (VSC)

IGBT-based modular multilevel converter (MMC); independent P and Q control; black-start capable; suited for offshore wind, weak grids, multi-terminal HVDC. Voltages up to ±525 kV with extruded XLPE cable.

Key HV challenges: DC field stress is conductivity-dominated (not permittivity-dominated), with steep dependence on temperature and contamination; polarity reversal in LCC causes severe transient stress; converter valve insulation must be redesigned for PWM-induced high-frequency overvoltages; DC circuit breakers remain an active research frontier.

Gas Insulated Switchgear (GIS) and Substations

GIS integrates circuit breakers, disconnectors, earthing switches, busbars, and instrument transformers in a metal-enclosed SF₆-pressurised assembly (66 kV to 1100 kV). Footprint is 10–25% of equivalent AIS; maintenance intervals reach 20–25 years. Specific HV phenomena include very fast transient overvoltages (VFTO) – nanosecond steep fronts (>kV/ns) from disconnector pre-strikes – and particle-induced flashover from metallic debris. The sustainability shift away from SF₆ (GWP ≈ 23 500) is driving adoption of g³ (Novec 4710 + CO₂), clean-air mixtures, and CO₂ blends.

Smart-Grid HV Monitoring and Digital Substations

Condition-based maintenance is enabled by on-line diagnostics: UHF PD sensors in GIS (300–3000 MHz); HFCT/TEV on cables and rotating machines; on-line DGA sensors with IoT telemetry interpreted via Duval triangle/pentagon; bushing tan-δ monitoring via leakage-current analysis; distributed temperature sensing (DTS) along cables; acoustic emission localisation in transformers. The digital substation (IEC 61850) uses a process bus carrying Sampled Values from optical CT/VT to merging units, with PTP time synchronisation (IEEE 1588, µs accuracy) and GOOSE messaging replacing hard-wired protection. AI/ML is increasingly applied to PD pattern recognition, DGA trending, and digital-twin calibration.

Section 10

Key Formulas and Comparison Tables

Formula Quick Reference

Phenomenon / DeviceFormula
Townsend avalanche (1st coeff.)\(I=I_0\,e^{\alpha d}\)
Townsend with secondary emission\(I=\dfrac{I_0\,e^{\alpha d}}{1-\gamma(e^{\alpha d}-1)}\)
Townsend breakdown criterion\(\gamma(e^{\alpha d}-1)=1\)
Streamer criterion\(\alpha d\approx18\text{–}20\)
Paschen's law\(V_b=f(pd)\), minimum at \((pd)_\text{min}\)
Peek's corona onset field\(E_v=m\delta E_0\!\left(1+\frac{0.301}{\sqrt{\delta r}}\right)\) kV/cm
HVDC ripple (half-wave)\(\delta V\approx I/(fC)\)
Cockcroft–Walton voltage drop\(\Delta V=\frac{I}{fC}\!\left(\frac{2n^3}{3}+\frac{n^2}{2}-\frac{n}{6}\right)\)
CW optimum stages\(n_\text{opt}\approx\sqrt{V_\text{max}fC/I}\)
Generating voltmeter current\(i(t)=V_\text{dc}\,dC/dt\)
Chubb–Fortescue (AC peak)\(V_\text{pk}=I_\text{avg}/(2fC)\)
ESV plate force\(F=\varepsilon A V^2/(2d^2)\)
Standard lightning impulse\(1.2/50\;\mu\text{s}\)
Marx output (no-load)\(V_\text{out}=nV_\text{ch}\); with stray \(C_s\): \(\eta=C_g/(C_g+C_s)\)
Schering bridge balance\(C_x=(R_4/R_3)C_N\), \(\tan\delta=\omega R_4 C_4\)
PD apparent charge\(q=C_b\Delta V\) [pC scale]
Travelling wave velocity\(v=1/\sqrt{LC}=c\) in air
Surge impedance\(Z_0=\sqrt{L/C}\)
Reflection / refraction coefficients\(\Gamma=(Z_2-Z_1)/(Z_2+Z_1)\), \(\tau=2Z_2/(Z_2+Z_1)\)
Striking distance (lightning)\(r_s=10\,I^{0.65}\) m (\(I\) in kA)
Risk of failure\(R=\int f(V)\,P(V)\,dV\)
ZnO arrester V–I\(I=kV^\alpha\), \(\alpha\approx25\text{–}60\)

Comparison of HV Measurement Methods

MethodQuantityRange & AccuracyBest Use
Sphere gapPeak (DC, AC, LI)Up to 2.5 MV; ±3%Lab calibration of any HV
Uniform-field gapPeakUp to 600 kV; ±1–2%Reference for AC peak
Rod gapPeakUp to MV; ±8%Field overvoltage estimate
ESV / absolute voltmeterRMS / DC10 kV–MV; ±0.5%DC reference standard
Generating voltmeterDCMV class; ±1%Continuous DC HV monitoring
Chubb–FortescueAC peakMV class; ±0.5%AC calibration
Resistive dividerDC & impulseMV; ±1%DC and impulse fronts
Capacitive dividerAC & impulseMV; ±1%AC and switching impulse
Mixed / damped dividerImpulseMV; ±1%LI + SI accurately
PT/CT (instrument transformer)AC RMSUp to 800 kVSwitchyard metering
Optical (Pockels / Faraday)AC, DC, impulseUp to MVGIS, HVDC, UHV

Comparison of Breakdown Mechanisms

MediumMechanismGoverning RelationTypical \(E_b\)
Gas (low \(pd\))Townsend\(\gamma(e^{\alpha d}-1)=1\)30 kV/cm (air, STP)
Gas (high \(pd\))Streamer (Meek)\(\alpha d\approx18\text{–}20\)30 kV/cm (air, STP)
Gas (uniform field)Paschen\(V_b=f(pd)\)
SF₆Streamer + attachment\((E/p)_\text{cr}\approx89\;\text{kV/(cm·bar)}\)89 kV/cm (STP)
VacuumField emission / clumpFowler–Nordheim; micro-particle100–500 kV/cm
Liquid (pure)Electronic, bubbleAvalanche, cavitation1 MV/cm
Liquid (commercial)Suspended particleBridging by contamination chain50–200 kV/cm
Solid (intrinsic)Electronic avalancheHigh-field, FN-like≥5 MV/cm
Solid (thermal)Joule heat balance\(\sigma(T)E^2=\) cooling losses1–3 MV/cm
Solid (electromechanical)Maxwell stress\(\varepsilon E^2/2>Y\)Polymer, rubber
Solid (treeing / PD)Tree growth from voidsPD inception, ageingLong-term failure
Solid (surface)Tracking, contaminationDry-band arcing5–30 kV/cm

HV Apparatus Design – Quick-Reference Flow

Iterative HV apparatus design flowchart starting from service voltage application and BIL SIWL specification then environment analysis electrode insulation geometry Emax computation decision whether Emax is within allowable limit if no apply stress control shields grading void removal and return to geometry step if yes proceed to thermal loss design then routine and type tests PD BIL SI AC DC then field installation and on-line monitoring
Iterative HV apparatus design flowchart. Starting from the service voltage, application, and BIL/SIWL specification, the designer progresses through environmental analysis, electrode/insulation geometry selection, and numerical field computation. If \(E_\text{max}\) exceeds the allowable limit, stress-control measures (shields, grading, void removal) are applied and the geometry is revised. Thermal and loss design, type testing, and on-site commissioning follow before the design is finalised.
Section 11

HV Laboratory Safety and Exam Essentials

HV Laboratory Best Practices

Layout and Earthing

  • Single-point grounding; low-impedance mat (<0.5 Ω).
  • Faraday cage / shielded lab to suppress EMI for PD measurement.
  • Clearances: ≥1 m/100 kV (peak AC); ≥3 m/MV (impulse).

Procedural Safety

  • Discharge stick and earth rod after every test; never rely on bleeders alone.
  • Interlocked perimeter; key-issue and dead-man systems.
  • Two-person rule for live operations; HV PPE (gloves, mat, face shield).
  • Capacitor bank dump resistors sized for stored energy in kJ.

Measurement Hygiene

  • Calibrate dividers periodically; verify against a sphere gap.
  • Use coaxial damping and matched terminations (50 Ω) to prevent travelling-wave reflections.
  • Shield instrumentation cabinets; use common-mode chokes on signal cables.
  • Document atmospheric correction factors for every test: \(V_\text{std}=K_d\,V_\text{meas}/K_h\).
Exam-Oriented Essentials – Must-Know Derivations

Always reproduce, with derivation if asked:

  • Townsend criterion \(\gamma(e^{\alpha d}-1)=1\) and how Paschen's law follows from \(\alpha=f(E/p)\).
  • Streamer (Raether–Meek) condition and contrast with Townsend (low-\(pd\) versus high-\(pd\) regimes).
  • Cockcroft–Walton ripple and voltage-drop expression; derivation of optimum \(n\).
  • Standard impulse \(1.2/50\;\mu\text{s}\) and Marx voltage-multiplication principle (charge in parallel, discharge in series).
  • Schering bridge balance and tan-δ derivation.
  • Travelling-wave reflection and refraction coefficients at open, short, and matched terminations.
  • Insulation coordination: conventional vs. statistical; meaning of \(V_{50}\), \(\sigma\), BIL, and \(V_{p,\text{SA}}\).
Common Conceptual Traps
  • DC stress in cables is conductivity-graded, not permittivity-graded. Temperature inversion can reverse the field distribution in HVDC cables, potentially over-stressing inner insulation.
  • In SF₆, breakdown is dominated by electron attachment. A small metallic protrusion dramatically lowers \(V_b\) by locally exceeding the critical \(E/p\).
  • The generating voltmeter reads only DC (or very slow change), not AC peak – contrast with Chubb–Fortescue.
  • Sphere-gap calibration depends on peak voltage, not RMS. Never substitute RMS into sphere-gap tables.
  • Tan-δ alone is a bulk diagnostic. Partial discharge measurement localises individual defects that are invisible to tan-δ.

References and Further Reading

Standard Textbooks

  • E. Kuffel, W. S. Zaengl, J. Kuffel, High Voltage Engineering: Fundamentals, 2nd ed., Newnes, 2000.
  • M. S. Naidu, V. Kamaraju, High Voltage Engineering, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2022.
  • C. L. Wadhwa, High Voltage Engineering, 3rd ed., New Age International, 2012.
  • D. Kind, K. Feser, High-Voltage Test Techniques, 2nd ed., Newnes, 2001.
  • L. L. Alston (ed.), High-Voltage Technology, Oxford University Press, 1968.

Pulsed Power and Modern Applications

  • H. Bluhm, Pulsed Power Systems: Principles and Applications, Springer, 2006.
  • P. W. Smith, Transient Electronics: Pulsed Circuit Technology, Wiley, 2002.

Standards

  • IEC 60060-1/-2/-3: HV test techniques – general, measuring systems, on-site tests.
  • IEC 60071-1/-2: Insulation coordination – definitions, principles, and application guide.
  • IEC 60270: Partial discharge measurement.
  • IEEE Std 4: Standard for HV testing techniques.
  • IEC 61850: Communication networks and systems for power utility automation.