Pulsed Power Engineering
Take a modest amount of energy, gather it slowly over seconds, then release the whole store in a single microsecond — and for that instant you command a power of gigawatts, rivalling a national grid, from a machine that sips only kilowatts to charge. This is the central trick of pulsed power: amplifying power not by making more energy, but by compressing the time in which it is delivered. The impulse generators of high-voltage testing were our first taste of it; this chapter develops the full discipline — how energy is stored, switched and shaped into a pulse — and shows how the same art now drives accelerators, lasers, fusion experiments and the pulsed-field treatments of the next chapter.
- The principle of power amplification by time compression — why \(P_{\text{peak}} = W/\tau_{\text{pulse}}\) dwarfs the charging power.
- Capacitive (\(\tfrac12 CV^2\)) versus inductive (\(\tfrac12 LI^2\)) storage and their opposite switching demands.
- The RLC discharge and its underdamped, critically damped and overdamped pulse shapes.
- The Marx generator, which charges \(N\) capacitors in parallel and erects them in series for \(V_{\text{out}}\approx N V\).
- Pulse-forming lines and networks (and the Blumlein) that shape a flat pulse of width \(\tau = 2\ell/v\).
- The closing switches from spark gaps to solid-state, the move to high-repetition-rate systems, and the applications of pulsed power.
The Pulsed-Power Idea
Power is energy per unit time, \(P = W/t\). Pulsed power exploits this ruthlessly: it does not generate vast energy, but takes an ordinary amount and delivers it in an extraordinarily short time. Charge a store over one second and dump it in one microsecond, and the peak power exceeds the charging power by the ratio of those times — a million to one. The energy is humble; the power is colossal. This is power amplification by time compression, and it is the whole philosophy of the field.
The pay-off is a regime of power unreachable any other way. A bench supply delivering a few kilowatts, run for a second into a capacitor, can produce a microsecond pulse of gigawatts — enough to drive a particle beam, flash an X-ray tube, pump a laser, or punch an electric field through living cells. Every pulsed-power system is an answer to one question: how do we store the energy, and how do we let it out fast enough?
Storing the Energy
There are two places to keep electrical energy: the electric field of a capacitor, or the magnetic field of an inductor.
The two differ in a way that decides the whole machine. To release a capacitor's energy you close a switch — connect it to the load — and good closing switches are plentiful. To release an inductor's energy you must open a switch while it carries the full current, forcing the current to commutate into the load; the inductor then develops a huge \(L\,\mathrm{d}i/\mathrm{d}t\) voltage. Inductive storage has a higher energy density (a magnetic field packs more energy per litre than a practical electric field), but the opening switch — a fuse, a plasma-opening switch, a fast semiconductor — is far harder to build than a closing switch. For that reason the great majority of pulsed-power systems store their energy capacitively, in banks of capacitors, and the rest of this chapter follows that mainstream.
The RLC Discharge
The elementary pulse circuit is a charged capacitor discharged through the unavoidable inductance \(L\) and resistance \(R\) of its leads and load. The character of the pulse depends entirely on how the resistance compares with the circuit's natural impedance \(\sqrt{L/C}\), through the damping condition:
An underdamped circuit rings — the current oscillates and reverses, useful when a sinusoidal burst is wanted but hard on capacitors. A critically damped circuit gives the fastest single pulse with no reversal. An overdamped circuit gives a slow rise and long decay — and this is exactly the double-exponential shape of the \(1.2/50\) impulse from the high-voltage-generation chapter, where one time constant sets the front and another the tail. The peak current of a low-loss discharge is \(I_{\text{peak}}\approx V\sqrt{C/L}\), and the time scale is set by \(\sqrt{LC}\) — so low inductance is the key to a fast, high-current pulse, which is why pulsed-power hardware obsesses over short, fat, low-inductance conductors.
The Marx Generator
A single capacitor can only be charged to the voltage of its supply, yet pulsed power often needs hundreds of kilovolts or megavolts. The classic solution is the Marx generator, a voltage multiplier of beautiful simplicity. Its \(N\) capacitors are charged in parallel through high-value resistors, each reaching the modest charging voltage \(V\). Then a trigger fires the switches — traditionally spark gaps — that reconnect the capacitors in series. The voltages add, and the generator "erects" to an output of
The Marx is the workhorse of high-voltage pulsed power: ten stages charged to \(50~\mathrm{kV}\) erect to half a megavolt; large machines reach many megavolts. The charging resistors are large enough to behave as open circuits during the fast erection, so they isolate the stages without bleeding away the pulse. The triggered first gap over-volts the next, which fires the next, and the whole stack erects in nanoseconds. The classical Marx uses gas spark gaps, but the modern evolution — replacing each gap with a stack of semiconductor switches — yields a solid-state Marx that fires precisely, repeats rapidly and lasts for billions of shots, a major theme of present-day pulsed-power research.
Pulse-Forming Lines and Networks
A capacitor discharge gives an exponential pulse, but many applications — radar, accelerators, lasers — need a flat-topped rectangular pulse of precise duration. The elegant way to make one revives the travelling-wave physics of Chapter 23. Charge a length of transmission line (a pulse-forming line, PFL) to voltage \(V_0\); when a switch connects it to a matched load \(R=Z\), a wave travels to the open far end, reflects, and returns, draining the line in exactly one round trip. The result is a clean rectangular pulse whose width is the round-trip time:
Two refinements complete the toolkit. The Blumlein arrangement uses two lines so that the matched load receives the full charge voltage \(V_0\) rather than half, while keeping the rectangular shape and the \(2\ell/v\) width. And when the required pulse is so long that a real line would be impractically long, a pulse-forming network (PFN) — a ladder of lumped inductors and capacitors — mimics the line's behaviour in a compact box, the number of sections trading off against the flatness of the pulse top. Together, PFLs and PFNs let the engineer dial in a pulse of chosen amplitude, duration and shape.
Closing Switches
If the capacitor is the muscle of pulsed power, the switch is its heart — and its hardest organ. A closing switch must hold off the full charge voltage as a near-perfect insulator, then, on command, collapse to a near-perfect conductor in nanoseconds while carrying kiloamperes, repeatably and with low timing scatter (jitter). No single device does all of this perfectly, so the choice is a set of trade-offs:
| Switch | Strengths | Limits |
|---|---|---|
| Gas spark gap (trigatron, rail) | huge voltage & current, simple | erosion, jitter, low rep-rate, finite life |
| Thyratron / ignitron | high power, fast, triggerable | ageing, warm-up, being superseded |
| Thyristor / IGBT / MOSFET | precise, repetitive, long-lived | limited \(V\) and \(I\) per device → must stack |
| GaN HEMT / avalanche transistor | very fast, low jitter, compact | low per-device rating → many in series |
The historical workhorse is the gas spark gap — a triggered breakdown between electrodes that can switch megavolts and megamperes, at the cost of electrode erosion, shot-to-shot jitter and a limited repetition rate. The modern direction is decisively toward solid-state switching: thyristors, IGBTs, MOSFETs, fast GaN HEMTs and avalanche transistors, which fire with sub-nanosecond precision and survive billions of shots. Because each semiconductor holds off only a limited voltage, they are series-stacked — often in a solid-state Marx arrangement — to reach the required level, trading the spark gap's brute simplicity for precision, longevity and high repetition rate. (The dual problem, the opening switch for inductive systems, remains genuinely difficult and is met with exploding-wire fuses, plasma-opening switches and fast semiconductor openers.)
Repetition, Solid-State and Diagnostics
Early pulsed power was single-shot: charge for minutes, fire once, recover. Modern systems increasingly run at high repetition rate, firing thousands of times a second, which transforms the design priorities. The average power is now \(P_{\text{avg}} = W_{\text{pulse}}\times f_{\text{rep}}\), so heat removal, capacitor lifetime and switch longevity dominate — exactly the strengths of solid-state switching and the reason it has displaced spark gaps wherever repetition matters (industrial, environmental and biomedical pulsed power above all). The same fast fronts impose a severe insulation duty of their own: the steep \(\mathrm{d}V/\mathrm{d}t\) stresses the polymeric and oil insulation of the system in the fast-front regime of Chapter 26, demanding careful grading and clean dielectrics.
Diagnostics close the loop, and they are exacting because the signals are large and fast. Voltage is measured with carefully compensated resistive, capacitive or mixed dividers; current with Rogowski coils, Pearson current monitors or low-inductance current-viewing resistors; and all of it captured on wide-bandwidth oscilloscopes, where the instrument's bandwidth must exceed the pulse's spectral content or the measured front will be a fiction. Measuring a pulsed-power shot well is as much an art as making it.
Applications
The reach of pulsed power runs from the laboratory to the food factory. In high-voltage engineering itself, the impulse generators that test insulation are pulsed-power machines. In physics and defence, Marx-driven systems power particle accelerators, flash radiography (single X-ray snapshots of fast events), high-power microwave sources, intense lasers, and the giant Z-pinch and inertial-confinement experiments pursuing fusion. But the fastest-growing branch is the environmental and biomedical one, built on the pulsed electric field (PEF): short, intense field pulses that open the membranes of biological cells (electroporation), enabling non-thermal inactivation of microbes in water, wastewater and food, gentler extraction in processing, and emerging cancer and gene-therapy treatments.
These PEF systems are frequently Marx-generator-based, marrying the voltage-multiplying topology of Section 27-4 with the modern solid-state switching of Section 27-6 to deliver clean, repetitive microsecond pulses at the field strengths cells require. They are the natural bridge to the next chapter, which takes up the science and engineering of pulsed-electric-field applications in their own right — and they show how a discipline born to test transformers and drive fusion has become a tool for treating water and healing patients.
Worked Examples
Problem. A \(C = 10~\mu\mathrm{F}\) capacitor is charged to \(V = 50~\mathrm{kV}\) and discharged in \(\tau = 1~\mu\mathrm{s}\). Find the stored energy and the peak power.
Solution. Use \(W=\tfrac12 CV^2\) and \(P\approx W/\tau\):
From a \(12.5~\mathrm{kJ}\) store comes a 12.5 GW pulse — gigawatts from a capacitor a charging supply could fill in a second at a few kilowatts. That is time compression in numbers.
Problem. A Marx generator has \(N = 10\) stages, each a \(C = 100~\mathrm{nF}\) capacitor charged to \(V = 50~\mathrm{kV}\). Find the output voltage, the erected capacitance and the energy.
Solution. Apply \(V_{\text{out}}=NV\), \(C_{\text{erected}}=C/N\), \(W=N(\tfrac12 CV^2)\):
500 kV from a \(50~\mathrm{kV}\) supply, with an erected \(10~\mathrm{nF}\) holding \(1.25~\mathrm{kJ}\) — the Marx trades capacitance for voltage while conserving energy.
Problem. A \(C = 10~\mu\mathrm{F}\) capacitor at \(V = 50~\mathrm{kV}\) discharges through a low-loss circuit of \(L = 1~\mu\mathrm{H}\). Estimate the peak current.
Solution. For a lightly damped discharge \(I_{\text{peak}}\approx V\sqrt{C/L}\):
About 158 kA — and it would be larger still with lower inductance, which is why low-\(L\) construction is the obsession of pulsed-power hardware.
Problem. A pulse-forming line is \(\ell = 10~\mathrm{m}\) long with wave velocity \(v = 2\times10^{8}~\mathrm{m/s}\), charged to \(V_0 = 200~\mathrm{kV}\). Find the pulse width and the matched-load voltage.
Solution. Use \(\tau = 2\ell/v\) and \(V_{\text{load}}=V_0/2\):
A flat 100 ns pulse at 100 kV into the matched load. Want it twice as long? Double the line. Want full voltage? Use a Blumlein.
Problem. A solid-state system delivers \(W = 2~\mathrm{J}\) per pulse in \(\tau = 200~\mathrm{ns}\) at a repetition rate \(f = 5~\mathrm{kHz}\). Find the peak and average power.
Solution. Peak \(P_{\text{pk}}=W/\tau\); average \(P_{\text{avg}}=Wf\):
10 MW peak but only 10 kW average — a thousand-fold gap. The peak does the work; the average sets the cooling and the choice of solid-state switching to survive it.
Chapter Summary
Pulsed power amplifies power by releasing stored energy fast: \(P_{\text{peak}}=W/\tau_{\text{pulse}}\) far exceeds the charging power.
Capacitive \(\tfrac12 CV^2\) (closing switch) dominates; inductive \(\tfrac12 LI^2\) (opening switch) is denser but harder.
Damping sets the shape — ring, single pulse, or the overdamped double-exponential; \(I_{\text{pk}}\approx V\sqrt{C/L}\).
Charge \(N\) caps in parallel, erect in series: \(V_{\text{out}}\approx NV\), \(C_{\text{erected}}=C/N\); now going solid-state.
A charged line gives a rectangular pulse of width \(2\ell/v\) at \(V_0/2\); Blumlein gives full \(V_0\); PFN mimics a long line.
From spark gaps to solid-state stacks; high rep-rate enables PEF, accelerators, radiography, microwaves and fusion.
Problems
For each item, first identify what it tests — the time-compression idea, the storage choice, the RLC discharge, the Marx generator, the pulse-forming line, the switches, or repetition rate — then apply it. Difficulty rises down the list.
- Explain how pulsed power achieves a peak power far above its charging power without generating more energy.
- Compare capacitive and inductive energy storage and explain why one needs a closing and the other an opening switch.
- State the three damping regimes of an RLC discharge and which one gives the standard impulse waveform.
- A \(20~\mu\mathrm{F}\) capacitor is charged to \(40~\mathrm{kV}\) and discharged in \(2~\mu\mathrm{s}\). Find the energy and peak power.
- A Marx generator has \(8\) stages of \(80~\mathrm{nF}\) charged to \(60~\mathrm{kV}\). Find the output voltage, erected capacitance and energy.
- A \(15~\mu\mathrm{F}\) capacitor at \(30~\mathrm{kV}\) discharges through \(0.5~\mu\mathrm{H}\). Estimate the peak current.
- A pulse-forming line is \(6~\mathrm{m}\) long with \(v = 2\times10^{8}~\mathrm{m/s}\), charged to \(160~\mathrm{kV}\). Find the pulse width and matched-load voltage, and say how to double the width.
- Give two advantages and two limitations of gas spark gaps versus solid-state switches.
- A system delivers \(5~\mathrm{J}\) per pulse in \(500~\mathrm{ns}\) at \(2~\mathrm{kHz}\). Find the peak and average power.
- Explain why pulsed electric field (PEF) systems are often Marx-based and what advantage solid-state switching brings to them.