Electrical Sciences · Lecture

Transformer Losses & Equivalent Circuits

Transformers

Prof. Mithun Mondal BITS Pilani, Hyderabad Campus
SECTION 01

Demonstrative Video

SECTION 02

Losses in a Transformer

  • Types of losses in a transformer:

    • Iron or core loss

    • Copper loss

  • Iron loss:

    • Due to the reversal of flux in the core

    • Practically constant at all loads (no load to full load)

    • Subdivided into two losses:

      • Hysteresis loss

      • Eddy-current loss

  • Hysteresis loss:

    • Occurs due to the alternating flux in the core

    • Depends on factors such as hysteresis loop area, core volume, and frequency of flux reversal

  • Eddy-current loss:

    • Occurs due to the flow of eddy currents in the core

    • Depends on factors such as lamination thickness, frequency of flux reversal, maximum flux density, core volume, and quality of magnetic material

    • Eddy-current losses can be reduced by decreasing lamination thickness and adding silicon to steel.

  • Copper loss:

    • due to the resistances of primary and secondary windings

    • depends upon the load on the transformer

    • proportional to square of load current of kVA rating

  • \[\boxed{W_{C u}=I_{1}^{2}R_{1}+I_{2}^{2}R_{2}}\]
SECTION 03

Ideal and Practical Transformers

  • For an ideal transformer:

    1. No core loss and copper loss.

    2. Winding resistance and leakage flux are zero.

  • In a practical transformer:

    1. The windings have some resistance.

    2. There is always some leakage flux.

  • In an ideal transformer, it is assumed that all the flux produced by the primary winding links both the primary and secondary windings. However, in practice, this condition cannot be realized.

  • The flux \(\phi_{L1}\) represents the primary leakage flux, which links only to the primary winding and does not link to the secondary winding.

  • Similarly, \(\phi_{L2}\) is secondary leakage flux, which links only to the secondary winding and does not link to the primary winding.

  • The mutual flux, \(\phi\) , links both the primary and secondary windings.

  • \(\phi_{L1}\) is in phase with \(I_1\) and produces a self-induced emf \(E_{L1}\) in the primary winding.

  • \(\phi_{L2}\) is in phase with \(I_2\) and produces \(E_{L2}\) in the secondary winding.

  • The induced voltages \(E_{L1}\) and \(E_{L2}\) caused by \(\phi_{L1}\) and \(\phi_{L2}\) differ from the induced voltages \(E_1\) and \(E_2\) caused by the main or mutual flux \(\phi\) .

  • Leakage fluxes generate self-induced emfs in their respective windings.

  • Consequently, the leakage fluxes are equivalent to inductive coils connected in series with their respective windings.

  • \[E_{L_1}=I_1X_1~~\text{and}~~E_{L_2}=I_2X_2\]
    The voltage drop in each series coil is equal to the voltage produced by the leakage flux.
image
SECTION 04

Phasor Diagram at No Load

  • No Load \(\Rightarrow\) core loss and Cu loss in primary winding

  • \(I_0\) supply core loss and very small Cu loss in primary

  • \(I_0\) has two components:

    • \(I_\mu~\Rightarrow\) magnetising or reactive component

    • \(I_w~\Rightarrow\) power or active component

  • \(I_\mu\) sets flux ( \(\phi\) ) in the core and is in phase with \(\phi\)

  • \(I_w\) responsible for power loss and phase with \(V_1\)

\[\begin{aligned} I_\mu & = I_0\sin\phi_0 \\ I_w & = I_0\cos\phi_0\\ \bar{I}_0 & = \bar{I}_\mu + \bar{I}_w\\ I_0 & = \sqrt{I^2_\mu+I^2_w} \end{aligned}\]
image
  • \(I_0\) is very small as compared to \(I_1\)

  • \[\boxed{W_0=W_i = V_1I_0\cos\phi_0}\]
    copper loss negligible and
SECTION 05

Phasor Diagram on Load

image
  • Load \(\Rightarrow~I_2~\Rightarrow~\phi_2~\Rightarrow~\phi \downarrow~\Rightarrow~I_1 \uparrow ~\Rightarrow~\phi \uparrow ~\Rightarrow\) constant \(\phi\)

  • \(I^{\prime}_2\) ( additional \(I_1\) is anti-phase with \(I_2\) ) sets \(\phi^{\prime}_2\) cancel \(\phi_2\) due to \(I_2\)

\[\begin{gathered} {\frac{N_{2}}{N_{1}}}={\frac{I_{1}}{I_{2}}}={\frac{I_{0}+I_{2}^{\prime}}{I_{2}}}={\frac{I_{2}^{\prime}}{I_{2}}}=K \\ \boxed{I_1 = I_0+I^{\prime}_2 }\\ \boxed{I_2'=KI_2 } \end{gathered}\]
\[\begin{aligned} &\overline{{V_{1}}} =\overline{I_1R_1}+\overline{I_1X_1}+(-\overline{E_1}) \\ &\overline{E_2} =\overline{I_2R_2}+\overline{I_2X_2}+\overline{V_2} \\ &\overline{{I_1}} =\overline{I_0}+\overline{I_2'} \end{aligned}\]

Resistive load

image
Inductive load
image

Capacitive load

image